When I say "need to exist", I mainly mean what in terms of what it contributes to the overall universe. And in Age of Ultron's case, I'd say it's mostly spinning its wheels until Phase 3 gets here.Baresark said:As a movie I very much liked it. I don't think it was as good as the first one though. I also don't feel that any movie "needs" to exist. That is a bit of a pedantic point to make, in my opinion. It had one major impact which was not done particularly well though. The main thing was to introduce the heroes of Earth to the Infinity Stones. In that respect, the most important scene was the stinger. Clearly vision is meant to play a big part of that (the Mind Gem and all) but it would have been better served if his character arrived sooner rather than in the last 20 minutes and then proceeded to not wow or impress in his abilities at all (no changing density, that would have been incredible, but then we got a stupid version of the Scarlet Witch too).
But does it need to exist? None of them need to exist. It moved the MCU forward, just in more baby steps than the previous films have done. It makes me wonder if you are going to be essentially reprinting this article after Antman comes out. That will also probably not progress the MCU in any meaningful way other than to introduce more characters.
That's fine with a standalone movie (like Ant-Man, for example) but very new for Avengers, which is supposed to be about big defining threats that no one hero can face alone. I mean, Loki is a major villain across three films. Thanos will be a cosmic villain across 3-6 films by the time it's done. But Ultron just gets one - and given that the ending very much seems like it's restoring the status quo, his impact is limited by comparison.