Alien Jihad's Devs Want To Generate Controversy

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
Hmm...I'm kind of of two minds about this. On one hand, it sounds like it could be a timely, if perhaps immature (Fat Buchanan? Really?) satire. I can approve of that. On the other hand, it kind of sounds like they arn't really shooting for any artistic vision, they are just being as controversial as possible because it looks like it could make a buck. Kind of reminds me of the end of the Bush era, after a number of people were criticizing him over horrible injustices, and it became so popular and easy to trash Bush that there were entire cottage industries based on anti-Bush T Shorts, buttons, etc. It was kind of annoying, because the content was so obviously profit drivel, it undermined the message. Guess we will have to wait and see.
 

mechanixis

New member
Oct 16, 2009
1,136
0
0
Being stupid and childish is still stupid and childish even if you're doing it on purpose.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
Just look at the script... it's so disheveled just for the sake of garnering controversy (I prefer to preserve the term 'satire' for writings with literary merit).

Anyone who's offended by this drivel... just... shouldn't be. Let this go under, unnoticed.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
Ignoring all the controversy etc, and the really childish naming conventions, it just seems really really bad.

Taking into account all the controversy and the really childish naming it seems really really really really stupid, AND really really bad.

It's like that whole thing with Siskel and Ebert in Godzilla, they later commented '"they let us off lightly; I fully expected to be squished like a bug by Godzilla. Now that I've inspired a character in a Godzilla movie, all I really still desire is for several Ingmar Bergman characters to sit in a circle and read my reviews to one another in hushed tones." Gene Siskel also questioned why, having made the effort to lampoon him and Ebert, the movie did not humiliate them further or even kill their characters'

If you're going to put such blatant parodies in your terrible game, why not at least have the balls to use their real names? Nick Puffin? The British Nazi Party? Come on, it would have been a better statement if they used the real names.
 

IndianaJonny

Mysteron Display Team
Jan 6, 2011
813
0
0
ArmorArmadillo said:
There is an entire category of media which are nothing but casual insulting immature slurs and attention grabbing, but then when people act insulted they claim "We were trying to raise attention to these issues."

It is bull. These developers are bull. I hope this game fails and that everyone banding together against it will create some real unity.
I agree with ArmorArmadillo here, the "our immaturity is de facto thought-provoking" argument is a tired, tired excuse for poor material. At least Duke Nukem abandoned that and went to the effort of having their PR spin and game premise consistent with one another.
 

llafnwod

New member
Nov 9, 2007
426
0
0
JackSparrowSucks said:
Socks and Shoes said:
The Random One said:
My eyes are bleeding from the pretentiousness.
>pretentiousness

I don't think you know the meaning of that word, because you sure as hell aren't using it right.
You're saying these guys aren't a bunch of elitist pretentious jerkwads who drink merlot because they heard about it in a movie?
Says the man quoting a years-old Maddox page...
 

Mouse_Crouse

New member
Apr 28, 2010
491
0
0
This is mostly what people have been saying so far. But it really feels like we've gone beyond "trying to make witty social comment" to "we're trying WAY too hard to make a point"
 

rsvp42

New member
Jan 15, 2010
897
0
0
This sounds terrible. The description is just a lame parody and an arcade shooter is hardly the genre for tackling anything meaningful.* There are many ways to make a game that deals with hefty issues, but this sounds all wrong. They can try to hide behind some pretense of making the industry "tackle mature subjects affecting millions of people's lives," but this sounds like a flimsy controversy over an even flimsier game concept.

I mean, why not just sell it as the alien arcade shooter it is and drop the overtones? My only guess is that the gameplay is insidiously bland and their only hope of selling it is to make a half-hearted connection to modern events.

"Fat Buchanan?" Really? This is the hard-hitting satire they're depending on?

edit: *at least in this sense. I'm sure there are cases where an arcade shooter could complement a game's message perfectly, but this is not one of them.
 

icame

New member
Aug 4, 2010
2,649
0
0
First I was like: What?
Then I was like: Why?
Finally I was like: O right, money!
 

bue519

New member
Oct 3, 2007
913
0
0
Dango said:
That just sounds like a 12 year old filled out a Mad Lib.
That seems to be the case, but if so then who cares. I did enjoy the Italian PM's underage girl friend though. Good ole Berlusconi. To be fair, great plots aren't a staple in video games today.
 

Undead Dragon King

Evil Spacefaring Mantis
Apr 25, 2008
1,149
0
0
Advanced "Fatwa" technology?

A mind control device that compels legions of people to carry out the will of a deranged maniac without any thought of compassion or mercy?

Sounds pretty advanced to me.
 

(LK)

New member
Mar 4, 2010
139
0
0
Tackling issues and attempting to create a controversy aren't mutually exclusive.

If you stir up a huge controversy over issues, and then just sit back and wait, the number of people who end up coming together to discuss those issues is uniquely large. In a way you're furthering the discussion simply by stimulating more people to have such a discussion in the first place.

Not that it's the best way to have a dialog on an issue, but the value of simply making people talk about it shouldn't be overlooked.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Well, my thought here is that I hope that this blows up in their face. It seems like an attempt to be as contreversial as possible, for the sake of making money off of the contreversy, especially seeing as they really don't have an issue to address for the game and are just pushing political buttons. I'd imagine the project probably started when someone looked at all the attention "Playable Taliban" were getting, not to mention the whole thing with "Juarez". They also probably figured that if they took a left wing/pro-Muslim track with the whole thing, they could avoid most of the more vocal critics and those who would be liable to you know... actually do something to them. Guys who produce works of fiction that are critical of Muslim culture tend to wind up with death warrents on their heads should they be known, what happened with "Satanic Verses" is a good example of this. The path they are taking is actually a sort of "contreversy along the path of least resistance" track.

I say this because a lot of their central statements might resonate with left wingers, but are untrue. The US is pretty much polarized 50-50 with elections being decided on a razor's edge. Obama came into power with a mere 7% lead, and Bush came in for two terms where they were pretty much counting individual ballots. We have a bit of a backswing in the current victories by the so called "Tea Party" but at the same time they are just as contreversial
as anything. The US has been a deadlocked mess for a while now, and anyone who thinks that this is due to a "sudden rise to power of right wing elements" is fooling themselves.

Likewise as I've demonstrated numerous times with links and such, the problem isn't with a tiny minority of people in "The Muslim World", but with the whole culture in the region, that's why it's such a hard problem to deal with. I've demonstrated this on a number of occasions by posting links to Muslim television shows and the like on numerous occasions which exist to condition children from a very early age to want to kill, enslave, or destroy non-Muslims and propagate their own culture. The problem with perception being that the mainstream media doesn't put much focus on covering these things, leading to the persistant opinion that we're dealing with a small, radical fringe, and thus garnering support for strategies that are ineffective since that's not what we're dealing with.

All of these things can be debated of course, and that isn't the point, the thing is, that this seems like it's not an attempt to address the subject as to basically try and make money off of a piece of intentionally misguided flame bait.

As I've said before, I find situations like this disgusting because they make me question my own belief in free speech. I am very much someone who thinks that freedom of speech does NOT mean only the freedom for people to say what you agree with. I welcome contreversial, and even offensive dialogues, and engage in discussions with people I strongly disagree with all the time. In this case though it's not a dialogue, it's not a constructive or informed analysis of anything, it's simply an attempt to create chaos and profit off of it.

Sadly, I have to say I hope this backfires on them, but at the same time it would probably be a greater evil to actually stop it, or for the app store (or whatever market they use) to refuse to carry it.