Sir, that is probably the most intelligent question I'm going to hear today, and I think you win instead of that other guy.thedoclc said:No you don't.Faladorian said:actually, if the natives have tissue that you can eat that lets you absorb the nutrients that you need to survive as a human, then they had to get those nutrients through some means, which you could repeat and spare the locals.hittite said:I thought this up a while ago, and I've been trying to decide how it would turn out ever since. For the life of me, I can't decide.
Imagine, if you will, that you're stranded on an alien planet. By some miracle, the atmosphere is breathable and the wildlife isn't trying too hard to kill you. Unfortunately, you're running low on supplies and there is only one single edible thing on the planet: the natives. They're intelligent, friendly, and peaceful. They have done you no wrong. So the question comes down to this: murder an innocent or slowly starve to death.
I want to think that I'd do the noble thing and die, but I simply can't know for sure.
I win.
For those trying to knock down the hypothetical, here's a hard-science version. The alien planet's life does not use an amino acid which is essential for human survival. Without this amino acid, you die. (Since there are eight to ten amino acids which humans beings cannot survive without, depending on which text you consult, it would hardly be surprising.) Now, it turns out that the planet's life forms do not use methionine, threonine, or isoleucine, three amino acids without which we humans cannot live. Eat these amino acids or die. The only beings who use these three amino acids are the alien's sapient species, who modify other amino acids to form them. These amino acids are used to make a protein inside the sapient being's cardiac muscle.
In order to get the amino acids you must have to live, you must eat the cardiac muscle of these beings. In addition, the beings have a feudal culture which forbids any desecration of their dead; under no circumstances will they give you their dead, and they will fight to the death to protect their dead. Neither you nor the alien sapients are able to synthesize these amino acids in the lab, in your case because you do not have any know-how, and in their case because their culture is not technological enough. Nor do you have the time or resources to try this on your own. Maybe a future expedition can study the biochem of these creatures and learn how they work, but you're just a lonely pilot who is -very- hungry and far from home.
There you go, a hard science version to get to the same question.
And rather pointless survival at that, seeing how you won't be able to procreate.Alade said:I formulate a plan to systematically kill a lot of them at once and then ration the food from then on.
No need for excessive evil or moral dilemmas. Survival of the fittest.
I would also do this.TomLikesGuitar said:Generic Gamer said:I'd level with them about what I needed and hope that if they really are that friendly and peaceful they could supply me with the bodies of their dead.Jamboxdotcom said:i'd try to find fresh corpses.CloudKiller said:In a situation like this I'd have to think what my opinion would be if the situation were reversed and I'd say that I would allow them to eat the anyone that died.Wow, I thought I had an original idea for a second.Bobic said:Could I not eat the corpses of already deceased natives?
If the planet's life forms didnt use the amino acid, then the creatures wouldnt have it in their body anyway and eating them would be in vainthedoclc said:No you don't.Faladorian said:actually, if the natives have tissue that you can eat that lets you absorb the nutrients that you need to survive as a human, then they had to get those nutrients through some means, which you could repeat and spare the locals.hittite said:I thought this up a while ago, and I've been trying to decide how it would turn out ever since. For the life of me, I can't decide.
Imagine, if you will, that you're stranded on an alien planet. By some miracle, the atmosphere is breathable and the wildlife isn't trying too hard to kill you. Unfortunately, you're running low on supplies and there is only one single edible thing on the planet: the natives. They're intelligent, friendly, and peaceful. They have done you no wrong. So the question comes down to this: murder an innocent or slowly starve to death.
I want to think that I'd do the noble thing and die, but I simply can't know for sure.
I win.
For those trying to knock down the hypothetical, here's a hard-science version. The alien planet's life does not use an amino acid which is essential for human survival. Without this amino acid, you die. (Since there are eight to ten amino acids which humans beings cannot survive without, depending on which text you consult, it would hardly be surprising.) Now, it turns out that the planet's life forms do not use methionine, threonine, or isoleucine, three amino acids without which we humans cannot live. Eat these amino acids or die. The only beings who use these three amino acids are the alien's sapient species, who modify other amino acids to form them. These amino acids are used to make a protein inside the sapient being's cardiac muscle.
In order to get the amino acids you must have to live, you must eat the cardiac muscle of these beings. In addition, the beings have a feudal culture which forbids any desecration of their dead; under no circumstances will they give you their dead, and they will fight to the death to protect their dead. Neither you nor the alien sapients are able to synthesize these amino acids in the lab, in your case because you do not have any know-how, and in their case because their culture is not technological enough. Nor do you have the time or resources to try this on your own. Maybe a future expedition can study the biochem of these creatures and learn how they work, but you're just a lonely pilot who is -very- hungry and far from home.
There you go, a hard science version to get to the same question.
ahem...Faladorian said:If the planet's life forms didnt use the amino acid, then the creatures wouldnt have it in their body anyway and eating them would be in vainthedoclc said:No you don't.Faladorian said:actually, if the natives have tissue that you can eat that lets you absorb the nutrients that you need to survive as a human, then they had to get those nutrients through some means, which you could repeat and spare the locals.hittite said:I thought this up a while ago, and I've been trying to decide how it would turn out ever since. For the life of me, I can't decide.
Imagine, if you will, that you're stranded on an alien planet. By some miracle, the atmosphere is breathable and the wildlife isn't trying too hard to kill you. Unfortunately, you're running low on supplies and there is only one single edible thing on the planet: the natives. They're intelligent, friendly, and peaceful. They have done you no wrong. So the question comes down to this: murder an innocent or slowly starve to death.
I want to think that I'd do the noble thing and die, but I simply can't know for sure.
I win.
For those trying to knock down the hypothetical, here's a hard-science version. The alien planet's life does not use an amino acid which is essential for human survival. Without this amino acid, you die. (Since there are eight to ten amino acids which humans beings cannot survive without, depending on which text you consult, it would hardly be surprising.) Now, it turns out that the planet's life forms do not use methionine, threonine, or isoleucine, three amino acids without which we humans cannot live. Eat these amino acids or die. The only beings who use these three amino acids are the alien's sapient species, who modify other amino acids to form them. These amino acids are used to make a protein inside the sapient being's cardiac muscle.
In order to get the amino acids you must have to live, you must eat the cardiac muscle of these beings. In addition, the beings have a feudal culture which forbids any desecration of their dead; under no circumstances will they give you their dead, and they will fight to the death to protect their dead. Neither you nor the alien sapients are able to synthesize these amino acids in the lab, in your case because you do not have any know-how, and in their case because their culture is not technological enough. Nor do you have the time or resources to try this on your own. Maybe a future expedition can study the biochem of these creatures and learn how they work, but you're just a lonely pilot who is -very- hungry and far from home.
There you go, a hard science version to get to the same question.
1: yesHT_Black said:Two questions: Are they primitive? And what element are they composed of?
Give me those answers and I'll give you mine.
Well, if that's the case, then my days are short. Since their mental capacity probably isn't anything to write home about (made of sugar and all that), I'd konk a few over the head, put them into a large sack, and hightail it for wherever the nearest wizard is so I can get him to send me back home (or barring that, so I can beat him over the head and steal his stuff).hittite said:1: yesHT_Black said:Two questions: Are they primitive? And what element are they composed of?
Give me those answers and I'll give you mine.
2: I'm gonna say they're composed entirely of sucrose simply because I feel like it. How? Wizards.
Faladorian said:thedoclc said:I said they modify other amino acids into those amino acids, and are the only ones to do so. This has been observed in nature; we -create- the amino acid ornithine in our bodies. We don't rely on it from our diet.Faladorian said:If the planet's life forms didnt use the amino acid, then the creatures wouldnt have it in their body anyway and eating them would be in vainhittite said:I thought this up a while ago, and I've been trying to decide how it would turn out ever since. *snip*
And ornithine isn't even an amino acid coded for in DNA. The enzymes which make it are, of course.
So, yes, an organism could have an amino acid in its body which is not found in another organism or in the creature's diet.
Problem: arsenic is an element found in minerals. It doesn't spread and for the most part isn't the byproduct of anything. It's either in the rocks or not in the rocks.Talshere said:No, an isolated environment that for the most part remained so for a sufficient length of time could breed an organism capable of developing such an organ. You dont need a large area. Just an area that has remained unaffected, or with limited contamination for sufficient time. Just because the dodo evolved to have no fear response doesn't mean it couldn't have learned one given time.SakSak said:Yes, but note how arsenic-free our environment is. By setting every single most other life-forms as arsenic based, you essentially state "there is a significant percentage of arsenic in the environment".Talshere said:-.- we are carbon based life forms. Every major element we use, inc oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen, 3 of our main building blocks, are bonded to carbon to allow us to use them....SakSak said:I'm sorry, but I just have to point out how stupid this is, biologically speaking.Talshere said:Most of the indigenous life is arsenic in origin, the natives, who are the only "normal" carbon based life, have developed an organ that streams the arsenic from their system. Everyone should know arsenic is highly toxic to us.hittite said:Alien planet. Alien biology is, by definition, alien. They can eat the native plant and animal life just fine, since it's their home planet. It's only incompatible with you because you aint from around there.FargoDog said:So what are the natives eating?
Besides, that's not the point. The point is what you would do.
If their very body chemistry is based on carbon, they never would have survived long enough to actually evolve into anything with a specialised organ to deal with arsenic. The very first proto-lifeform would have starved to death.
And as a specialized organ cannot evolve before the organism it is part of actually lives and survives, but at the same time the organism cannot survive without the organ. This means either there are other sources of nutrient that are arsenic-free (violating the OP condition), or divine intervention of some kind must have happened to allow for that specific organism to live long enough to evolve an arsenic-dealing mechanism while retain inherent non-compatibility with the arsenic-based life.
Ie. There is no logical way for this to have happened - invoking magic is the only solution.
If both sets of life evolved simultaneously, then by the time life had become able to encroach on the environment, the other life would be evolved enough to adapt.
EDIT: By the time the environment became contaminated beyond repair, it is plausible that life could have evolved to cope. Which would also support the reasoning behind there only being one form of carbon life.
Take your remaining supplies, go to the natives, and eat the supplies in front of them. Then try and learn to communicate with them as fast as possible and relay that your hungry. Look around for a cemetery or mortuary that the natives use in there burying rituals, them once you start suffering from starvation, they'll either have figured it out by now that the only thing you can eat is them, or you can show them by trying to eat there dead, and if possibly trying to take a bite out of one of em. I wager this is the most likely scenario for your continued survival that doesn't include hunting and eating live natives.hittite said:Imagine, if you will, that you're stranded on an alien planet. By some miracle, the atmosphere is breathable and the wildlife isn't trying too hard to kill you. Unfortunately, you're running low on supplies and there is only one single edible thing on the planet: the natives. They're intelligent, friendly, and peaceful. They have done you no wrong. So the question comes down to this: murder an innocent or slowly starve to death.page=3#9164533
this is inconsistent with both the notions that these are peaceful and intelligent beings.thedoclc said:In addition, the beings have a feudal culture which forbids any desecration of their dead; under no circumstances will they give you their dead, and they will fight to the death to protect their dead.
Going by THIS version, I'd either try to "prove" myself to be a god through my superior knowledge and hope theey don't kill me for witchcraft, and demand their dead in return for safety(from me or whoever their enemies are) or barring that, kill myself because murder of one of them would not go unpunished.thedoclc said:No you don't.Faladorian said:actually, if the natives have tissue that you can eat that lets you absorb the nutrients that you need to survive as a human, then they had to get those nutrients through some means, which you could repeat and spare the locals.hittite said:I thought this up a while ago, and I've been trying to decide how it would turn out ever since. For the life of me, I can't decide.
Imagine, if you will, that you're stranded on an alien planet. By some miracle, the atmosphere is breathable and the wildlife isn't trying too hard to kill you. Unfortunately, you're running low on supplies and there is only one single edible thing on the planet: the natives. They're intelligent, friendly, and peaceful. They have done you no wrong. So the question comes down to this: murder an innocent or slowly starve to death.
I want to think that I'd do the noble thing and die, but I simply can't know for sure.
I win.
For those trying to knock down the hypothetical, here's a hard-science version. The alien planet's life does not use an amino acid which is essential for human survival. Without this amino acid, you die. (Since there are eight to ten amino acids which humans beings cannot survive without, depending on which text you consult, it would hardly be surprising.) Now, it turns out that the planet's life forms do not use methionine, threonine, or isoleucine, three amino acids without which we humans cannot live. Eat these amino acids or die. The only beings who use these three amino acids are the alien's sapient species, who modify other amino acids to form them. These amino acids are used to make a protein inside the sapient being's cardiac muscle.
In order to get the amino acids you must have to live, you must eat the cardiac muscle of these beings. In addition, the beings have a feudal culture which forbids any desecration of their dead; under no circumstances will they give you their dead, and they will fight to the death to protect their dead. Neither you nor the alien sapients are able to synthesize these amino acids in the lab, in your case because you do not have any know-how, and in their case because their culture is not technological enough. Nor do you have the time or resources to try this on your own. Maybe a future expedition can study the biochem of these creatures and learn how they work, but you're just a lonely pilot who is -very- hungry and far from home.
There you go, a hard science version to get to the same question.
I can eat a koala. I cannot eat eucalyptus.kikon9 said:The problem with this scenario is that any alien that is edible to us, must also have a food source which is edible to us.
If you eat eucalyptus unaltered, you would become extremely ill or in large quantities die. Koalas can eat it. Koalas are edible. An existing exception to a rule proves a flaw in the rule, not the nonexistence of the exception. We can consume eucalyptus extract that's been processed and heavily diluted, but cannot consume it in its plant form, especially if stranded in the wilderness with no way out as per our scenario. This continues: TECHNICALLY if you had an advanced enough lab and weren't starving, you could extract the arsenic from local flora and fauna and eat the result. But you're dying and need it now.JRiseley said:*any Secondary Consumer or greater which is edible to us must also have an edible food source.Nieroshai said:I can eat a koala. I cannot eat eucalyptus.kikon9 said:The problem with this scenario is that any alien that is edible to us, must also have a food source which is edible to us.
JRiseley said:have you ever tried eating a koala?Nieroshai said:I can eat a koala. I cannot eat eucalyptus.[/quotekikon9 said:The problem with this scenario is that any alien that is edible to us, must also have a food source which is edible to us.
*any Secondary Consumer or greater which is edible to us must also have an edible food source.
also assuming i already know their customs on their dead id go with those
despite what my "friends" may say about me i am not an "evil" man
and still too many unanswered questions like. do i find them appealing to look at?
are we compatible?