ZephrC said:
Even the term cold describes a relative temperature,
ZephrC said:
term cold describes a relative
ZephrC said:
ZephrC said:
ZephrC said:
Sure, you want to say the complete lack of heat is pretty cold, be my guest, you'd be right. By that same merit, you want to say 0C is cold, hey, go nuts. But you just said its a term that
describes a
relative temperature, which means that, relative to -273.15C, 0C is pretty hot. Even though its cold. And if we were to find something much colder than -273.15C (sounds silly I know, but the Earth is a very, very small place and the Universe is filled with all sorts stuff we don't know about) it would suddenly be able to bear both
descriptions of cold and warm.
Wait. I thought this was about color. Oh, yes.
ZephrC said:
You should probably look up what color actually means if you think that a lack of reflected light makes something not a color. Besides, I can basically guarantee you've never seen anything in your entire life that didn't reflect some light, so everything you've ever called black is still a color even if you were right, which you aren't.
You have no idea what a lack of reflected light means and you've pretty much based your entire argument around "you're wrong. No, you're wrong. I'm right. Even if you were right, which BY THE WAY you aren't, you'd be wrong. Which you are." If I had told you things you already knew then you would have seen my point and (probably) agreed with me.
So check it: have you ever been in the dark? Complete darkness? Yes? Good. Consider going into a small room with walls painted red. Turn out the lights. What color are the walls now? No, they aren't black, don't make me hit you. They're still red. What you see (nothing) is the absence of light. There is no reflection of light. What, what do you mean I'm wrong? I'm wrong because I'm not right?
I see there's no persuading you. I'm gonna get out of here before we incur moderator wrath.
[PS: Technically both points are correct. You're making the point that things that are black are "colored" black and therefore black is a color - that's the chemist's point of view. My point - one of wavelengths and light, is a physics standpoint. Ironic for me considering I'm a Chemistry major.]
[PPS: Actually there's a third point that I could argue here that's completely different from these two but it's clear there wouldn't be any point.]
[PPPS: bears]