Yeah, the more I think about it.. it's pretty crazy how memes work, isn't it. I probably picked these points up from talking to my friends, who probably had seen the video.erttheking said:Didn?t mean to assume, you just hit so many of the same points I thought you must have.
That said, I don't agree with everything. I think she's too soft on people generally, which is charitable but not necessary.
The central point is still mine, and it's one I've been thinking about actively for a long time now. Bad representation is genuinely better than no representation, and it really bothers me when people whom the representation isn't "for" suddenly care deeply about the quality of representation. Heck, it bothers me a little when people who the representation is "for" do the same, but I can understand it because any form of marginalization tends to make you a bit cynical.
Like, I actually don't even know what "good" trans representation would look like, at this stage. As I said in a post a while back, I think that's something which will emerge as we start to get more of a "trans gaze" in media (i.e. more trans people actually involved in creating media and bringing their own perspective informed by one another). For now though, it isn't going to happen, so if all we're going to get is "special issue" episodes and well meanining but goofy representation, I still think that's something to celebrate compared to.. you know.. nothing.