Never a good thing. Theres always those games that like to hide the low gameplay count with 9 hours of cutscenes *cough* Metal Gear Solid 4 *cough*Jandau said:True, and that's usually not a good thing...oliveira8 said:To be honest..you can finsih alot of games in under 8 hours(main quest without doing sidequests, hidden objects etc etc)Jandau said:It's enough to get the feel of the game. However, it's not enough to review it, or at least it shouldn't be. Would you trust a movie review where the reviewer only watched the first 30 minutes?oliveira8 said:8 hours is more than enough for a reviewer to learn the gameplay, get the basic feel of the levels and story.Jandau said:8 hours is enough to review Portal, not a game of any actual size. And it's definately not enough to review a serious sandbox game. Specifically, no one should review a game they haven't finished (and played fairly thoroughly) unless there's a damn good reason not to finish it. Unless you support rushed and inaccurate reviews, that is...oliveira8 said:8 hours is more than enough to review a sandbox game.
If you want to comeplete everything and see all the endings/cutscenes/stuff it will probably take more than 8 to 10 hours.
I'm not saying the reviewer should finish every tiny detail of the game, but at least play it from start to finish once. Without that, you're simply not doing your job.![]()