Are the forums too strict?

Recommended Videos

cryogeist

New member
Apr 16, 2010
7,782
0
0
Judgement101 said:
I think they aren't strict enough, I see a lot of advertising that goes unpunished, I see a lot of troll that goes unnoticed, I see a lot of flaming that goes unextinguished.
all my words are belong to you
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
Not strict enough. I've made at least 5 post with fapping jokes since my last suspension (For fapping jokes), and no punishment for it so far.

I can not let this stand.
If you put effort into them, were on topic and didn't insult someone, then they should be fine.
 

Sightless Wisdom

Resident Cynic
Jul 24, 2009
2,551
0
0
It seems to work in our favour though there are times where I wish they were a little more reserved with the ban hammer.(Or rather the probation hammer)
 

WorldCritic

New member
Apr 13, 2009
3,021
0
0
SHHHH, they're watching us.
Honestly, I think they're pretty fair about the rules here on the site. There have been some posts that got some guys on probation for reasons I didn't understand, but I probably didn't get the full story.
 

The .50 Caliber Cow

Pokemon GO away
Mar 12, 2011
1,686
0
41
Crack down moar, I see people getting away with stuff long after I've reported.

[sub]-A semilurker's report.[/sub]
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,210
0
0
Go to the Bioware Social Network and come back talking about strictness. At least here we're allowed to have differing opinions.
 

silversnake4133

New member
Mar 14, 2010
683
0
0
Lazarus Long said:
I may not agree with every ban or suspension I see on here, but I appreciate the transparency of the whole "X was banned for this post" system. I figure it's the mods' site. We are guests in their house, and if they wanted to ban us for, say, mentioning cheese, they would be well within their rights.
I wouldn't necessarily say the escapist is the mod's "house". If anything the escapist is like the ocean and the mods are the lifeguards. Because if this was their house, what's stopping the mods from shutting down the site and telling everyone to "get out". The escapist would eventually die because the contributers would no longer be welcome either since they are technically not "mods". All that would be left of this great site are the stagnating remains of past enjoyment left to decay in a corner.

All in all, I'm not disagreeing with you, but I think the metaphor of a house is a bit extreme, especially for how enormous the site's population is.

As far as the OT is concerned, I like the level of "strictness" as it is. It's far better than the Steam forums that's for sure.
 

JDKJ

New member
Oct 23, 2010
2,065
0
0
Make it whatever they want but apply it consistently and evenly. I guess that they don't is a product of having a bunch of different mods doing the modding, but it seems like one guy will get banned and the other guy will get nothing even though they both posted the exact same thing.

I also suspect that some of the mods read reported posts in a vacuum and don't take the larger context into consideration. That's how one combatant in a flame war gets time-out but the other combatant don't get shit. Because they're not seeing the entire flame-war. They're merely looking at who's firing a shot at a particular point in time.
 

GenericAmerican

New member
Dec 27, 2009
635
0
0
It seems like if you have a bad day around here, you'll get stuck with a warning or probation.

Sometimes it seems too much, sometimes too little....not very consistent around here.
 

JDKJ

New member
Oct 23, 2010
2,065
0
0
silversnake4133 said:
Lazarus Long said:
I may not agree with every ban or suspension I see on here, but I appreciate the transparency of the whole "X was banned for this post" system. I figure it's the mods' site. We are guests in their house, and if they wanted to ban us for, say, mentioning cheese, they would be well within their rights.
I wouldn't necessarily say the escapist is the mod's "house". If anything the escapist is like the ocean and the mods are the lifeguards. Because if this was their house, what's stopping the mods from shutting down the site and telling everyone to "get out". The escapist would eventually die because the contributers would no longer be welcome either since they are technically not "mods". All that would be left of this great site are the stagnating remains of past enjoyment left to decay in a corner.

All in all, I'm not disagreeing with you, but I think the metaphor of a house is a bit extreme, especially for how enormous the site's population is.

As far as the OT is concerned, I like the level of "strictness" as it is. It's far better than the Steam forums that's for sure.
Bump.

The posting community is the lifeblood of this and all other forums. If the posting community upped and left it to the mods, I doubt the remaining site traffic would support the advertising and pay the bills. It may be their "house" but we, the posters, are the ones that that pay the mortgage.
 

Atheist.

Overmind
Sep 12, 2008
631
0
0
The fact that the mods have a somewhat of a reputation for being strict is the very reason most people actually think before they post. Great way to eliminate low content or offensive posts.

Though I have seen a few people that are pretty good at trolling just enough to get away with it, like they've mastered dancing across the fine line between being a dick and being a troll.
 

Jared Berg

New member
Nov 7, 2010
10
0
0
i got a warning today for a post that said a new seires they have on this was bad and asked why it still excited but i did not use any bad words or anything and most people agreed with me but then i read a post saying the same thing just in different words im not sure but if they didnt get a warning then there being unfair
 

mireko

Umbasa
Sep 23, 2010
2,003
0
0
Jared Berg said:
i got a warning today for a post that said a new seires they have on this was bad and asked why it still excited but i did not use any bad words or anything and most people agreed with me but then i read a post saying the same thing just in different words im not sure but if they didnt get a warning then there being unfair
That person probably used punctuation.
 

JDKJ

New member
Oct 23, 2010
2,065
0
0
mireko said:
Jared Berg said:
i got a warning today for a post that said a new seires they have on this was bad and asked why it still excited but i did not use any bad words or anything and most people agreed with me but then i read a post saying the same thing just in different words im not sure but if they didnt get a warning then there being unfair
That person probably used punctuation.
LOL so hard my sides are hurting me. Win.
 

Kakashi on crack

New member
Aug 5, 2009
982
0
0
Hader said:
Criticize the post, not the poster. A simple rule many fail to follow, so they get slapped for it.
This kinda sums up the whole thing. I've generally (with a little censorship due to my colorfully dirty vocabulary) been able to speak my mind about a topic without any interference, it's mostly the people who are directly criticising another poster, or the topic starter who get suspended/probed/etc.
 

Mxrz

New member
Jul 12, 2010
133
0
0
Too strict? Dunno. Spotty moderation? Absolutely. The joy of user mods.

Anyway, Someone quotes or responds to you with some sheer brain-hurting stupidity, and when you point it out, they hit report and poof. It's all pretty silly, but it doesn't mean much in the long run. Kind of entertaining, in a way.