In case it hasn't been answered yet,Hader said:May I ask how the appeals process work exactly then? I am curious to compare things.maddawg IAJI said:What he fails to tell you is that he was being 'satrical' several times in that thread and was caught insulting other users.
Also, to anyone who believes they have a problem with any of the moderators, then please send in the appeal form that comes with your punishment or post in the mod team's group (Which can be found here [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/chat/Moderation-Team]
Every time you get put on probation or suspended, you get a chance to send an appeal to one of the staff members. Normally, it would be taken care of by Kuliani, but do to his leaving, they now go to another staff member according to Spinwhiz's post in the moderation group. If you can convince them, your punishment will be lifted.
Well I don't chose the moderators Chops, the community manager does. I can't tell you I was expecting that PM in my inbox asking me if I wished to be a moderator.stinkychops said:That appeal form you mention. I've tried to use it before, even changing or re-entering the email address.maddawg IAJI said:What he fails to tell you is that he was being 'satrical' several times in that thread and was caught insulting other users.Nihilism_Is_Bliss said:Yeah they're too strict.
Never been put on probation myself, but I swear half the time people are put on probation the mods are just having a really bad day.
Yeah that's the kind of thing I'm talking about.Jonabob87 said:It depends which mod finds what you've said I suppose. I got put on probation yesterday for being satirical about Americans celebrating Osamas death...
Yes you were being controversial, but what you said was related to the thread's topic and wasn't especially offensive or anything...don't understand.
Then there are some times I see people put on probation for a post that, no matter how much i analyse, can see no fault in whatsoever.
Also, to anyone who believes they have a problem with any of the moderators, then please send in the appeal form that comes with your punishment or post in the mod team's group (Which can be found here [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/chat/Moderation-Team]
I've never gotten a response. I'm fairly sure its something I'm doing and the email address always has apostrophes all through it.
Not sure.
Regardless, while I disagree with a couple people being made mods, I think its wrong to put all mods in the same kettle. For example, I disagree with a lot of LaCoils opinions, and vocally. She's still a good mod, albeit was/is strict. Nukes a legend. Cold-storage is great. Baby tea is pure class. A lot of the mod's I don't have an opinion on, they're very wishy washy, which makes sense (mod being short for moderator, see moderate).
For example, I've been here substantially longer than you. I've conversed with a lot of the mods before they were mods. I was put on suspension (probation) for some posts I made in an argument with Greyfox. I don't get along with her, and never really did and heavily disagree with her being made a mod. Regardless, the moderation is all usually done anonymously, and complaints are usually told to be directed at some Mod group. I could suggest that this is so that less of it is said, and less complaints are seen, but its probably just to keep the forum from dirtying up. I recall conversing with you a couple times, ironically I was telling you not to backseat mod (from memory).
All this having been said. I've seen some disgraceful bans in my time. Russ Pitts - Smelly Pitts banning was a bad one. Metatron. Zeeky Santos. Etc Etc.
In conclusion, I wouldn't say the mods are too strict, the forums are decent level they are partially because of them. I would say however that a few mods jump the gun, and there is ambiguous arbitrary calls made on vague and somewhat unclear calls made by a non-transparent group. Clearly this is hard to agree with, even fully recognizing the fact the Escapist is a for-profit business venture.
BTW Guys. Anyone who thinks the mods are too strict wasn't lurking in the old days of Joe. I saw some hilarious mass-bannings.
@Maddawg - It's spelled argument damnit! - Forgot to mention how I don't like the way - mass reports = banning. I've been told by a mod/s that someones gone through and spammed report all my posts.
As for the typo, I was in a rush and put too much hope in my spell checker D= and mass=reports doesn't always equal bans. Repeated offenses= bans.