Are you an online loser?
- Thread starter Isla
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Since I usually play solo, winning or losing tends to amount to luck. I don't really care about winning, but I do care if the winning team are obnoxious dicks. Think teabagging in Halo, I can't stand that shit. Not really because it's offensive, but because most people who do it have a false impression of their grandiosity or "1337ness". Durr I stomp random public lobbies in a full team. Never mind that they just might be unlucky enough to not have friends online at the time. Dun matter, just get energeh sw0rd and rocket lawn chair and sit in the corner for the whole fucking game while the rest of my team ragequits and leaves me and one other poor bastard trying to fend off a team with the higher ground, more numbers, communication and the sniper, sword, rockets and shotties. Durr press button and I get kill mean I have skill time for balls in mouth lol also I sign up on MLG website.
So yeah, I hate losing to pricks, usually because there's nothing you can do about it. If my team sucks but it doesn't affect my score, then I don't really care. The other team were better and they won.
So yeah, I hate losing to pricks, usually because there's nothing you can do about it. If my team sucks but it doesn't affect my score, then I don't really care. The other team were better and they won.
I am rarely placed No. 1, but often times placed in the middle/upper 1/3.. I do feel quite frustrated when I once in a while just get my ass handled to me, but then I just quit and play something else. And of course it's satisfactory to dominate someone. Just earlier this evening I got a 4-5 CQC kill streak online in KZ3. As a tactician. Was unbelievable.Isla said:
Playing fighting games and SHMUPS tends to get you used to losing. I don't really mind. I'm trying to grow out of my silly there's no way I can lose mindset that I used to have. I still have traces of it left, but I'm working on it!
I'm a try-hard, but I do win at least 80% of the time in CoD. Of course I have my share of bad games, and I lose almost every time against noob tube morons, but against legitimate players I usually win.
Cod= 3KD
in free for all I rarely lose and since I don't roll with a party free for all seems like the most viable option for personal growth and examination.
in free for all I rarely lose and since I don't roll with a party free for all seems like the most viable option for personal growth and examination.
I lost interest in competitive multiplayer 10 years ago at the age of around 14. In FPS games it's an endless cycle, and a random pattern of luck. You can't really say that you're "good" or "bad" at a FPS game. You can be "more accustomed" and "experienced" at them, but good or bad, the path your bullet takes will always be a less than 99% randomized chance. Also, even with broadband connections, lag will always exist and be an issue with these games. You aim at the head. You fire at the right time at the head, but the head wasn't really there because you were experiencing split-second lag that's unavoidable. Basically, you spawn, you kill or you die. That's as complex as it gets. You can memorize maps, get more accustomed to the controller and how the different weapons fire, but in the grand scheme of things you're going to be killing and dying at random. Sometimes you'll get a lot of kills, sometimes you'll suck terribly. No one can accurately predict when someone is going to turn around a corner, sneak up on them or snipe at them from beyond visibility. Unless they hack.Isla said:
Another reason I don't play FPS multiplayer anymore is it's died on my favorite platform, the PC. I dislike FPS multiplayer with the thumbsticks. I'm less accurate/fast with my nubbs on my hands. I like the precision and speed the mouse provides.
I've never liked Fighting games, it's too much of a hassle to memorize 20 combo moves for every fighter game. The person you play with always gets mad at you and calls you cheap or a cheater, etc when they lose repeatedly.
I also lost interest in MMORPG PVP competitiveness. It's another feature that isn't based on actual skill, but random luck and time. The more time you devote to the game, the stronger your character. If you get a lucky critical hit, you were stronger for that one hit and so you won. It basically boils down to this. You start on a PvP realm thinking "this is going to be fun, fighting other people!". You run along trying to level your guy up, never seeing anyone your same level (they're always higher than you, or if theyre the same level as you they run away from you). And you get ganked by some max level guy running by. That's PvP! haha! If you don't like it why are you on a PvP realm! *sarcasm*. Um maybe because I want to fight people when I even have a chance to win? Would people play Halo if every match had someone who was invincible in it? Wouldn't they be right to say "hey I couldn't even fight back.."? Anyway, yeah.
The only competitive multiplayer I enjoyed in the past were strategy games, StarCraft, Command and Conquer, etc. I'll never forget the time I took on my older brother and my father in StarCraft and defeated them both (they were even sharing a base and cooperating against me!).
However, I never had an interest in MASTERING strategy games, so I very rarely play them online. The people are just too good. I accept that I'll never be that good and that its just a video game. I actually don't find value in becoming so great at a game anyway. I choose instead to play games for fun, and when I stop having fun and it becomes a job or too great of a time-sink, I stop playing and find something else (or another game) to do.
So I don't compete with people online because it's not very fun to me. I spend that time helping them out instead. It's a lot more fun in my opinion.
Depends on the game, really. If it's very teamwork-oriented, I'll get more annoyed at losing when it's because my teammates are too lazy to just turn around and punch the hunter off of me, or picked medic without the intention to heal because they just want a big point score with their G36E. If it's something like CoD where a few good players can carry an entire team, I don't mind losing so much.
I tend to be pretty good at games. Whenever I lose, it tends to be because I have a terrible toeam who would rather lone-wolf the entire game than work together. It's why I try to always play with friends.
I have a tendency to land at around 50-50 in most games. Only game I ever got really good at was Battlefield 2142. I would more often than not end up in the top 3 players regardless of whether we won or lost. Other than that I almost always end up somewhere around 50-50.
I don't mind losing if it was a good game. If I lost for completely bullshit reasons like getting spawn camped or spawn trapped or any number of cheap tactics I'll be infuriated, but if it was a game where everyone was playing properly and the other team were just better then I don't mind. However, I avoid online play unless I'm with my friends because it makes losing more bearable.
I'm good depending on game mode. In CoD my fav is sabotage. my best K/D in sabotage is 60/15 
I'm pretty average at everything else though, but I usually end up more positive than negative. Losing doesn't bother me unless it's because there's a sniper on my team that wont do the objective.
I'm pretty average at everything else though, but I usually end up more positive than negative. Losing doesn't bother me unless it's because there's a sniper on my team that wont do the objective.
