I once drew up a functioning model of a bicycle suspension fork in Sketchview because I was bored in class. I also own every Calvin and Hobbes collection. Ever.
Well there does come a point where long is too long. I just really get into game stories, so when my buddy skips everything I get a little agitated. I'm sure our shared interest in history would make up for itSimuLord said:You'd hate me then. My typical response to a long cutscene is "I'll be back after I go have lunch. And if there's a quick-time event in here I'm going to find the developer and garrote him."
I also don't feel any affiliation with the word "geek", but that's mostly because my native language doesn't seem to have an equivalent for it. Nerd is a nerd.Sniper Team 4 said:I call myself a nerd, as geek seems to be too mainstream and "cool" now, and I have been told on many occasions that I am neither of these things. Plus, I've always been called a nerd, never a geek.
Except for three things; I`m a civil, don`t do LAN any more and the gameboy fact we share the same. HI CLONE!mb16 said:well im doing mechanical engineering with CAD (computer aided design) at uni
i did physics and maths for a-level
i know millions of memes
im going to a LAN party this sunday
i have have played a game for more than 15hours straight with 1break for food=poop (fallout)
i have every orginal gameboy game starting with a "P"
i also have strong preferences and will argue to the death for things that dont really matter
Your phallic representation is smaller than your opponent's phallic representation.JustShyofGenius said:I'm on the right and I have a matching trophy from two years prior.
![]()
No, a true geek would be able to appreciate both -- and a really serious geek would much rather watch Star Trek: The Motion Picture than Star Trek (2009), which was basically Star Wars in Star Trek clothing. Seriously, Star Wars has cross sub-cultural appeal; it takes a true nerd to geek out over Star Trek, but anyone who likes explosions can enjoy Star Wars.Sturmdolch said:I hate hearing people say, "Oh my gawd I loooooved Star Trek as a kid! I was such a GEEK!" No you weren't. If you were, you'd know that Star Wars is infinitely better than Star Trek.
Is that Malbolge? I can't make heads or tails of it.loc978 said:-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
version 3.12
GAT d--@ s+:+ a- C++ U---@ P L+ E? W+@ N o?
K- w O- M-@ V? PS+ PE Y PGP- t 5+ X R tv b+
DI++++ D G e>++ h-- !r y++*
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
...what?
Low Key said:I configure routers in OSPF and EGRIP protocols before and after I play some vidya. Then, I log on to a Linux machine and type a ton of commands into the terminal. NO GUIs ALLOWED!
Ladies please, there is enough of me to go around.
The IR spectrum. Ohh it's been a while. Where's that signature O-H peak!?thethingthatlurks said:Ladies and Gentlemen, fellow Escapists:
What are we if not geeks? Our common hobby alone is a perfect example of that, yet it is hardly the extend of the geekiness for some of us. In this thread, proudly strut your geekiness! The "pics or it didn't happen" rule is in effect. We want EVIDENCE, not anecdotes!
Naturally, I'll start:
![]()
Some of you may recognize this molecule. It's caffeine, a most wonderful compound. This isn't a simple rendering. The spectrum (IR for the curious) was calculated from scratch using the B3LYP method. The mesh is the electron density around the molecule, also calculated by yours truly (aka my netbook over 3-ish hours). Uhm yes, I do quantum mechanical calculations for fun...
I approve. I've been meaning to build a Lego adding machine for the past few years, but I don't have enough space to pull them all out and work on it. Oh, and it uses balanced ternary [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_ternary], because binary and decimal are for wimps. I mostly worked out the math side of it a while ago and have ideas for the mechanics, but I'm not sure when I'll get around to actually putting it together.Singularly Datarific said:I've built an engine that runs on compressed air. From Legos.
A "true" sci-fi geek would complain that both Star Trek and Star Wars are barely even science fiction (Star Trek is at the very, very "soft" end of the spectrum, and Star Wars is more like fantasy set in space) and then go back to the Nerd-Cave to read instead, because there's relatively little sci-fi stuff in TV/movie form that isn't so soft it's squishy. As much fun as both of those are (and I've spent many, many hours with both and enjoy them), they're not nearly as geeky (and usually not nearly as good, in my opinion) as some of the books and short stories out there. I'm probably a bit biased by growing up with access to a pretty significant collection of books from the Golden Age, though (a lot of which I was lucky enough to be given by my uncle, who was into them when he was growing up).Owyn_Merrilin said:No, a true geek would be able to appreciate both -- and a really serious geek would much rather watch Star Trek: The Motion Picture than Star Trek (2009), which was basically Star Wars in Star Trek clothing. Seriously, Star Wars has cross sub-cultural appeal; it takes a true nerd to geek out over Star Trek, but anyone who likes explosions can enjoy Star Wars.Sturmdolch said:I hate hearing people say, "Oh my gawd I loooooved Star Trek as a kid! I was such a GEEK!" No you weren't. If you were, you'd know that Star Wars is infinitely better than Star Trek.
Touche, although I've read my share of golden age stuff too. I do tend more towards the pulp side of the spectrum, though; hard scifi can be good, but I don't like it when the fi is too heavily bogged down by the sci.Nalgas D. Lemur said:A "true" sci-fi geek would complain that both Star Trek and Star Wars are barely even science fiction (Star Trek is at the very, very "soft" end of the spectrum, and Star Wars is more like fantasy set in space) and then go back to the Nerd-Cave to read instead, because there's relatively little sci-fi stuff in TV/movie form that isn't so soft it's squishy. As much fun as both of those are (and I've spent many, many hours with both and enjoy them), they're not nearly as geeky (and usually not nearly as good, in my opinion) as some of the books and short stories out there. I'm probably a bit biased by growing up with access to a pretty significant collection of books from the Golden Age, though (a lot of which I was lucky enough to be given by my uncle, who was into them when he was growing up).Owyn_Merrilin said:No, a true geek would be able to appreciate both -- and a really serious geek would much rather watch Star Trek: The Motion Picture than Star Trek (2009), which was basically Star Wars in Star Trek clothing. Seriously, Star Wars has cross sub-cultural appeal; it takes a true nerd to geek out over Star Trek, but anyone who likes explosions can enjoy Star Wars.Sturmdolch said:I hate hearing people say, "Oh my gawd I loooooved Star Trek as a kid! I was such a GEEK!" No you weren't. If you were, you'd know that Star Wars is infinitely better than Star Trek.