Question is if only a fraction of you lends it's personality to the tposting style, or that you can honestly say that you feel you are 100 % yourself.Jenny Creed said:If I was not the character/person/entity that's posting this, then who'd be posting it?
Well, I'm being myself. But if someone was, say, 50% himself when posting, then only that half would be answering to the question. There's no part of anyone engaged in this discussion that's not 100% itself and therefore honest when answering yes.Longshot said:Question is if only a fraction of you lends it's personality to the tposting style, or that you can honestly say that you feel you are 100 % yourself.Jenny Creed said:If I was not the character/person/entity that's posting this, then who'd be posting it?
I apologize for my gramatical error. There is always room for improvement.Jenny Creed said:Well, I'm being myself. But if someone was, say, 50% himself when posting, then only that half would be answering to the question. There's no part of anyone engaged in this discussion that's not 100% itself and therefore honest when answering yes.Longshot said:Question is if only a fraction of you lends it's personality to the tposting style, or that you can honestly say that you feel you are 100 % yourself.Jenny Creed said:If I was not the character/person/entity that's posting this, then who'd be posting it?
At least according to my theories on consciousness.
By the way it's "its". "It's" is short for "It is".