Aren't System Requirements Just A *****.

Recommended Videos

LewsTherin

New member
Jun 22, 2008
2,443
0
0
I have a similiar system and pickup DoW 2 the other day. It only lags a little on middling settings.

I will echo the sentiments of more RAM.
 

General Ken8

New member
May 18, 2009
1,260
0
0
I've got a great story to tell you, Escapist
The day i got the sims 3, before i could install it, i had to go to my guitar lesson a half hour away from my house, so i went there, had my lesson, and on the way home we got lost looking for my sister's softball game (took about 2 hours for all of this total)
Next, i installed the game, hooray! (Took about 40 minutes)
Next, i got all the updates on the launcher (took 5 minutes)
Then, i tried to start the game, and being impatient, i was ready to play the moment the updates were done, but then a message came up saying "IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THIS GAME PREFORMS WELL ON YOUR COMPUTER AND DOESN'T CAUSE IT TO CRASH OR FREEZE, WE RECOMMEND HAVING A MAC 10.5.7. YOUR MAC IS A 10.5.6" So i went to the apple site and got the upgrade (Took 1 hour to finish updating)
After this, i started playing, but after fifteen minutes i had to go to bed because it was late and it was a school night
:,(
 

The_Echo

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3,251
0
0
timmytom1 said:
EcoEclipse said:
timmytom1 said:
EcoEclipse said:
timmytom1 said:
EcoEclipse said:
Mac owner + Looking up system requirements = "Well, fuck."

Because of this, I don't have much say in this. But going from what I know, I'd say it might be a good idea to, at the very least, give options for people who don't have all the requirements.
They still release games for mac?
i thought that was the cool computer for people who are too cool to do nerdish things like play videogames and stuff
so buy the most awesome looking computer,with all the funtionality of a notebook.
You lost me.
Help?
Sure?
Are we just goping to around for hours asking questions?? XD
I'm becoming confused.
 

Chrissyluky

New member
Jul 3, 2009
985
0
0
khaimera said:
Yet another reaosn why I prefer consile gaming. That and the cost of having a good rig to run the best games.
only difference is instead of upgrading your computer and having absolute freedom you have to buy a new console and pay $10 more for games :p. not mentioning controllers headsets xbox live etc etc.
 

Lopunny

New member
Apr 15, 2009
236
0
0
You think you have problems? :p I keep buying games my laptop won't handle, not because of the graphics, but because they need a screen resolution PAST WHAT I CAN DO :p
 

300lb. Samoan

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,765
0
0
System requirements have always been a pain in the ass. Just be glad you weren't involved in buying games back in the late 90s, when you were looking at which line of Pentium you had and how many megabytes of ram you needed (hundreds of dollars for an 8mb upgrade when I was twelve). System requirements are growing more slowly than ever right now.
 

300lb. Samoan

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,765
0
0
General Ken8 said:
After this, i started playing, but after fifteen minutes i had to go to bed because it was late and it was a school night
:,(
Welcome to owning a computer.
 

SuperMaster

New member
Jul 16, 2009
31
0
0
yeah i always hate that.
the thing is i bought a portable a year ago and now i cant play cool games like prototype and such ( i dont know about u but i like it )
then i tought why dont i start saving money for new computer but a new computer who filled my requirements was 900 euros ( Portugal) or plus!!!
and then i saw the games i wanted also for ps3 wich costs 400 euros!!! its like... half the price!!! and now im sab«ving up for it in the hope that sony doesnt release a ps4 in 2 year time!!!
 

P.A.R.

New member
Jun 10, 2009
17
0
0
i'm always in a similar situation like this. I have a mac and i can't really upload games so the most awesome online games i can't play
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
YuheJi said:
When I first bought Age of Empires 3, it said it required Windows XP (which still wasn't widely adopted yet). I was pretty pissed off, because it could run on Windows 2000, it just wouldn't install on it. People were able to install on an XP machine and move them over to a Windows 2000 machine, but I lacked XP.
Windows XP was first released on 25 October 2001
Age of Empires III (AOE III) was Released on October 18, 2005

(Wikipedia so might be wrong)

So you were upset that they required XP on a game released 4 years after XP? At what point does it become ok?

On Topic the last time I was bummed by system requirements was when I had to use a "family PC". Once I got my own it was just a matter of saving lunch money or cutting a few lawns and I was able to keep up. Or if I wanted to forego both those things I waited till my dad had another mid life crisis, capped his PC and I got his old PC's remains which tended to play anything I wanted to play.

Then again I've never been beating off a boner when new games come out. The "gameplay" is just gone replaced with "graphics". I love graphics as much as the next guy but if it plays like a syphilitic sociopath I'm not going to enjoy it not matter how pretty it is.
 

Orca87

New member
Jul 23, 2009
60
0
0
I'd like to be the guy with the up to date machine who plays Crysis warhammer at full speed laughing, while torrents seed away in the background, but that particular delusional fantasy comes crashing down when I realise how crap my hdd is.
I can happily play half life 2 episode 2 at full speed and full graphics, but it stutters every time it need to load or save anything.
I also needed to steam the game direct, because my dvd drive is crap.
SO
I need a delicious new SATAII and a blue ray drive FIRST, then my four gigs of Ram, Radeon HD 3800 and Athlon X2 64 can make me proud.
Till then, it's lightning fast portal, between chapter points :/
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,075
0
0
YuheJi said:
When I first bought Age of Empires 3, it said it required Windows XP (which still wasn't widely adopted yet). I was pretty pissed off, because it could run on Windows 2000, it just wouldn't install on it. People were able to install on an XP machine and move them over to a Windows 2000 machine, but I lacked XP.
Age of Empires 3 came out in 2005. Windows XP had been out for four years and was by far the dominant operating system on the market, had received its second Service Pack by then, and ran on any decent midrange PC of the time. You had a dinosaur of a computer if it wouldn't run Age 3.
 

chronobreak

New member
Sep 6, 2008
1,865
0
0
I've been thinking about getting a good video card, but don't know if it will help much in my situation. If somebody could help me, that would be awesome! 3 GB DDR 2 Channel, AMD Phenom 9500 Quad Core 2.4ghz rated at 5.1 ghz (that's what systems requirements lab says anyways), 500 GB Hard Drive, and for a video card I have a Radeon X850. Running Vista 32, it is a Gateway GT5674.

Keep in mind I know little about computers. If I upgraded my card, is the rest of the stuff sufficient?
 

YuheJi

New member
Mar 17, 2009
927
0
0
theultimateend said:
YuheJi said:
When I first bought Age of Empires 3, it said it required Windows XP (which still wasn't widely adopted yet). I was pretty pissed off, because it could run on Windows 2000, it just wouldn't install on it. People were able to install on an XP machine and move them over to a Windows 2000 machine, but I lacked XP.
Windows XP was first released on 25 October 2001
Age of Empires III (AOE III) was Released on October 18, 2005

(Wikipedia so might be wrong)

So you were upset that they required XP on a game released 4 years after XP? At what point does it become ok?
A lot of people still used 2000 at the time (I ran across a number of forums complaining about it). Not only that, but the installer required XP to run. It wasn't like Storm Rise that can only run DirectX 10. The game ran fine on a Windows 2000 machine, but the installer would not let you install the game if you weren't running XP. Sort of like Halo 2 requiring Vista.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
YuheJi said:
theultimateend said:
YuheJi said:
When I first bought Age of Empires 3, it said it required Windows XP (which still wasn't widely adopted yet). I was pretty pissed off, because it could run on Windows 2000, it just wouldn't install on it. People were able to install on an XP machine and move them over to a Windows 2000 machine, but I lacked XP.
Windows XP was first released on 25 October 2001
Age of Empires III (AOE III) was Released on October 18, 2005

(Wikipedia so might be wrong)

So you were upset that they required XP on a game released 4 years after XP? At what point does it become ok?
A lot of people still used 2000 at the time (I ran across a number of forums complaining about it). Not only that, but the installer required XP to run. It wasn't like Storm Rise that can only run DirectX 10. The game ran fine on a Windows 2000 machine, but the installer would not let you install the game if you weren't running XP. Sort of like Halo 2 requiring Vista.
Well that sucks ass. I didn't know anything about that. I basically had XP the second it was available (my father got the stuff free from the government) so it didn't seem like that big of a deal.

I know what you mean about the installer though.

Windows Live works 100% fine on 64 bit windows XP but the installer won't let you do it. You have to find the individual installers to install it.

Pissed me off so bad.
 

Slayer_2

New member
Jul 28, 2008
2,474
0
0
How the hell is this possible? My PC is only slightly better than that (the dual core is 3.0Ghz) everything else is the same and I run it fine. Unless you have the 256MB GPU, mine is the 8800GT 512MB.
 

phar

New member
Jan 29, 2009
643
0
0
Slayer_2 said:
How the hell is this possible? My PC is only slightly better than that (the dual core is 3.0Ghz) everything else is the same and I run it fine. Unless you have the 256MB GPU, mine is the 8800GT 512MB.
Yeah exactly, I got a 2.4ghz C2D and a 8800GTX and it runs just fine.

On topic yeah im moving towards consoles myself. Im just getting sick of all the crap PC ports we get, ie. Mass Effect and Bioshock. Im just getting sick of paying for a videocard that will last a while and it costs a lot more than a console would. If they allowed mouse and keyboard support for more games on console (maybe just for single player) im sure a heap of people will flock over.
 

USSR

Probably your average communist.
Oct 4, 2008
2,366
0
0
Fat Man Spoon said:
ansem1532 said:
Fat Man Spoon said:
Yeah, I bought this great looking RTS game, 8gb big. Installed it (2 hours) and it said something about pixel shading. So I couldn't play.
This is why you should always test it before you buy it.

(i.e.-download and mount the ISO
This was a couple of years ago, so I had no idea about that stuff.
Ah, well that makes sense =3