Olas said:
Thyunda said:
The hackers are wrong. Flat-out, objectively wrong. You don't know the kind of people who are on that website. You don't know why they're cheating. You don't know them and you don't know their partners. You don't have the right to make that decision. If they want to cheat, it's their relationship. Not yours.
I can't think of any scenario where cheating is justified. Can you? They chose to get married, said the vows, made a promise of fidelity, and if for some reason they no longer want to be held to those vows, there's a process for ending them. They aren't just breaking a promise, they're breaking a promise in secret, a lie by omission. In what circumstance does that become something defensible?
Sorry, but these people are just scum, and just because they're personal lives are none of MY business, that doesn't mean it isn't their spouse's.
Let's see...
Abuse. Emotional distance. Financial control. Social control. Here's a question for you - if your spouse is not treating you like a person and, for example, uses children to blackmail you into not seeking legal help (If you go for divorce, you'll never see them again), then what obligation do you have to continue to be loyal to that person? They're not the person you married anymore, something's changed in them. They broke the vows first, using your very self-righteous logic, and therefore the entire promise is null and void.
I can think of a thousand reasons why cheating might be justified. What if one partner simply doesn't want sex anymore and leaves the other to stew in frustration? Why
shouldn't the partner seek gratification elsewhere? Because they said ten years prior that they wouldn't? That they didn't foresee that sex might just simply stop happening whether they like it or not?
Or would you rather make it illegal or immoral to withhold sex from a partner? Because that's the only other option.