Ask a Voraphile (possibly disturbing)

[Scabious]

I am a macrophile. That means I am sexually attracted to giants, more specificly female giants, giantesses. Many like a violent, downright cruel giantess, but I like almost specificly kindness. Not that there is anything wrong with the majority, which is violent. I have no problem with the vore community but one. Whenever I look up the commen keywords, "Gentle Giantess" I always get plenty of vore. Vore writers and artist, writers espiecially, always start, tag, or throw in as a plot device "gentle giantess". Many of us complain, but there are so many vorophiles and not as many "gentle" fans. Have you ever even heard of this problem? Many haven't, so I was just wondering if you have, and if you agree with me.

I do have sympathy, but I haven't heard of the exact thing. Is there a tag exclusion feature on whatever site you're using?

I use various sites, and I sometimes just use a search engine, but when I do have a tag exclusion, somtimes the vore isn't even metioned, though this is admittedly less common.

 

[Ironic Pirate]

OP, what is the foundation or basis for your fetish? Like, what brain function triggers the sexiness when you see someone being swallowed?

I guess I don't follow. Do you mean what specific part of my brain causes arousal? I have no idea.

I am a macrophile. That means I am sexually attracted to giants, more specificly female giants, giantesses. Many like a violent, downright cruel giantess, but I like almost specificly kindness. Not that there is anything wrong with the majority, which is violent. I have no problem with the vore community but one. Whenever I look up the commen keywords, "Gentle Giantess" I always get plenty of vore. Vore writers and artist, writers espiecially, always start, tag, or throw in as a plot device "gentle giantess". Many of us complain, but there are so many vorophiles and not as many "gentle" fans. Have you ever even heard of this problem? Many haven't, so I was just wondering if you have, and if you agree with me.

I do have sympathy, but I haven't heard of the exact thing. Is there a tag exclusion feature on whatever site you're using?

I use various sites, and I sometimes just use a search engine, but when I do have a tag exclusion, somtimes the vore isn't even metioned, though this is admittedly less common.

Ah, that would suck. There aren't any giantess only sites without vore?

 

[Scabious]

I am a macrophile. That means I am sexually attracted to giants, more specificly female giants, giantesses. Many like a violent, downright cruel giantess, but I like almost specificly kindness. Not that there is anything wrong with the majority, which is violent. I have no problem with the vore community but one. Whenever I look up the commen keywords, "Gentle Giantess" I always get plenty of vore. Vore writers and artist, writers espiecially, always start, tag, or throw in as a plot device "gentle giantess". Many of us complain, but there are so many vorophiles and not as many "gentle" fans. Have you ever even heard of this problem? Many haven't, so I was just wondering if you have, and if you agree with me.

I do have sympathy, but I haven't heard of the exact thing. Is there a tag exclusion feature on whatever site you're using?

I use various sites, and I sometimes just use a search engine, but when I do have a tag exclusion, somtimes the vore isn't even metioned, though this is admittedly less common.

Ah, that would suck. There aren't any giantess only sites without vore?[/quote]

If they don't have vore, it's somthing else violent, or something involving a specific part of the body (foot), which I typicly find rather boring. "Gentle" fans are, in my own words, a minority inside a minority. Sometimes I feel lik it's supposed to be a stepping stone between "normal person without fetish" and violence. It's like a gate-way drug, and if you're only doing that you're not welcome to the good writing on the vore side. If that's sensible.