Asylum of the Daleks
A Doctor Who discussion for longtime fans and newbies, too!
Read Full Article
A Doctor Who discussion for longtime fans and newbies, too!
Read Full Article
I thought that was more because the Doctor-Donna screwed with the reality bomb and the Supreme Dalek blamed Davros despite his protests that the Doctor did it.We most recently saw Davros in The Stolen Earth and Journey's End (2008), where he was accused of betraying the Daleks because if there's one constant in the Whoniverse, it's that Davros' arrogant assertions that he's amazingtown don't mesh well with the Daleks' inability to appreciate nuance.
Yeah Oswin was a genius and that's why she was turned into a Dalek, but 80% of the things she does in the Asylum are based around her being able to be able to control Dalek-tech, which we discover she is only able to do because she is connected to the Daleks by being one. She may be smart but so was Captain Jack. The Doctor is definitely smart but he also seems so much smarter compared to the humans he picks up that know jack-squat about science or time travel. He's shown before that he dislikes anyone whose intellect rivals his own (Jack, River, the Master because he is as smart as him and that intelligence is used against him) but 21st century humans are so ignorant to the wider universe that he can lord it over them with what he knows because he can show off!Oswin is that most rare of characters on Doctor Who - one who can not only keep up with the Doctor, but actually surpass him in some ways.
I would assume it was, as you said, because while she is a genius and thus good Dalek material, she refused to give up her humanity.Wilcroft said:It will be interesting to note *why* Oswin was locked up in the room. Was it because she was deemed more insane than all the others for refusing to acknowledge being a Dalek? If not, then why lock her up with all "Doctor-survivor" Daleks? Had she met the Doctor before getting changed, and if so, why didn't she remember him?
SO MANY QUESTIONS!
I think it's hasty to assume that it is Oswin, per se, who becomes the companion, and not just the actress playing someone else. When we saw Lalla Ward, for example, she wasn't Romana.TimeLord said:I would assume it was, as you said, because while she is a genius and thus good Dalek material, she refused to give up her humanity.Wilcroft said:It will be interesting to note *why* Oswin was locked up in the room. Was it because she was deemed more insane than all the others for refusing to acknowledge being a Dalek? If not, then why lock her up with all "Doctor-survivor" Daleks? Had she met the Doctor before getting changed, and if so, why didn't she remember him?
SO MANY QUESTIONS!
I think the bigger question is how is the Doctor going to save Oswin when she becomes his companion without screwing with what she did to the Daleks. Oswin said herself that the Daleks have grown stronger in fear of the Doctor, so it's not just his own security against the Daleks the the Doctor would sacrifice by saving Oswin pre-Alaska but the entire universe. While the Daleks may still advance and exterminate, they won't do it to combat the Doctor directly, unless saving Oswin resets what she did, which would be a pointless waste of an episode and an Intersting universe shift she created.
The lone defenceless Dalek in 'Dalek' suffocated its torturer to death with it's plunger arm and the Cult of Skaro used it to drain the life and memories out of the scientist in Torchwood tower.Susan Arendt said:Of course, none of the Daleks threatening the Doctor at Oswin's door had blasters, so what was there to be scared of? That bugged me rather a lot.
Hmm...perhaps. Though it's worth noting that The Doctor has dodged past Daleks by putting his hat on their eyestalk, too. Bit weaksauce, is all I'm saying.TimeLord said:The lone defenceless Dalek in 'Dalek' suffocated its torturer to death with it's plunger arm and the Cult of Skaro used it to drain the life and memories out of the scientist in Torchwood tower.Susan Arendt said:Of course, none of the Daleks threatening the Doctor at Oswin's door had blasters, so what was there to be scared of? That bugged me rather a lot.
Also you've got this iconic image of the Daleks. Maybe Moffat was paying homage to it?
True and Karen Gillan played a bit part in 'Fires of Pompeii' before becoming the companion. But that was years apart and it's literally 3 months until the Doctor gets a new companion. It wouldn't make sense to me to use the same actor for two quite large parts in the same series. But then again who knows what goes through Moffat's mind!Susan Arendt said:I think it's hasty to assume that it is Oswin, per se, who becomes the companion, and not just the actress playing someone else. When we saw Lalla Ward, for example, she wasn't Romana.TimeLord said:I would assume it was, as you said, because while she is a genius and thus good Dalek material, she refused to give up her humanity.Wilcroft said:It will be interesting to note *why* Oswin was locked up in the room. Was it because she was deemed more insane than all the others for refusing to acknowledge being a Dalek? If not, then why lock her up with all "Doctor-survivor" Daleks? Had she met the Doctor before getting changed, and if so, why didn't she remember him?
SO MANY QUESTIONS!
I think the bigger question is how is the Doctor going to save Oswin when she becomes his companion without screwing with what she did to the Daleks. Oswin said herself that the Daleks have grown stronger in fear of the Doctor, so it's not just his own security against the Daleks the the Doctor would sacrifice by saving Oswin pre-Alaska but the entire universe. While the Daleks may still advance and exterminate, they won't do it to combat the Doctor directly, unless saving Oswin resets what she did, which would be a pointless waste of an episode and an Intersting universe shift she created.
You can add Freema Agyeman to the whole 'in Doctor Who before playing a companion character' list too.TimeLord said:True and Karen Gillan played a bit part in 'Fires of Pompeii' before becoming the companion. But that was years apart and it's literally 3 months until the Doctor gets a new companion. It wouldn't make sense to me to use the same actor for two quite large parts in the same series. But then again who knows what goes through Moffat's mind!Susan Arendt said:I think it's hasty to assume that it is Oswin, per se, who becomes the companion, and not just the actress playing someone else. When we saw Lalla Ward, for example, she wasn't Romana.
Now, be fair. Lalla Ward was literally Princess Astra in one episode and Romana in the next.TimeLord said:True and Karen Gillan played a bit part in 'Fires of Pompeii' before becoming the companion. But that was years apart and it's literally 3 months until the Doctor gets a new companion. It wouldn't make sense to me to use the same actor for two quite large parts in the same series. But then again who knows what goes through Moffat's mind!Susan Arendt said:I think it's hasty to assume that it is Oswin, per se, who becomes the companion, and not just the actress playing someone else. When we saw Lalla Ward, for example, she wasn't Romana.TimeLord said:I would assume it was, as you said, because while she is a genius and thus good Dalek material, she refused to give up her humanity.Wilcroft said:It will be interesting to note *why* Oswin was locked up in the room. Was it because she was deemed more insane than all the others for refusing to acknowledge being a Dalek? If not, then why lock her up with all "Doctor-survivor" Daleks? Had she met the Doctor before getting changed, and if so, why didn't she remember him?
SO MANY QUESTIONS!
I think the bigger question is how is the Doctor going to save Oswin when she becomes his companion without screwing with what she did to the Daleks. Oswin said herself that the Daleks have grown stronger in fear of the Doctor, so it's not just his own security against the Daleks the the Doctor would sacrifice by saving Oswin pre-Alaska but the entire universe. While the Daleks may still advance and exterminate, they won't do it to combat the Doctor directly, unless saving Oswin resets what she did, which would be a pointless waste of an episode and an Intersting universe shift she created.
They didn't want to destroy such "exquisite hatred" as they saw in the failed Daleks, they were implying that they saw something similar in The Doctor... which is of course horrifying to him.IndianaJonny said:I enjoyed the "it is offensive to us" spiel from the Daleks about destroying 'beautiful' objects of such hatred (not as a personal concept, just as a further addition to the Daleks' character). I'm not a fan of the slide in depiction from total warrior race to Saturday morning cartoon villians, so something that gave them a bit more venom was appreciated.
The killer-line of the episode was "Perhaps that is why we have never been able to kill you." directed at the Doctor...and then it was just left hanging there, what was with that?
I know! A punchy line with such weighty implications and the episode just seemed to..glaze over it and carry on - my reaction was very much in the "Wait up, he just said WHAT?!" camp.PedroSteckecilo said:They didn't want to destroy such "exquisite hatred" as they saw in the failed Daleks, they were implying that they saw something similar in The Doctor... which is of course horrifying to him.IndianaJonny said:..The killer-line of the episode was "Perhaps that is why we have never been able to kill you." directed at the Doctor...and then it was just left hanging there, what was with that?