Fair enough I did not know that. I'm not great with Classic Who triviaSusan Arendt said:Now, be fair. Lalla Ward was literally Princess Astra in one episode and Romana in the next.TimeLord said:True and Karen Gillan played a bit part in 'Fires of Pompeii' before becoming the companion. But that was years apart and it's literally 3 months until the Doctor gets a new companion. It wouldn't make sense to me to use the same actor for two quite large parts in the same series. But then again who knows what goes through Moffat's mind!Susan Arendt said:I think it's hasty to assume that it is Oswin, per se, who becomes the companion, and not just the actress playing someone else. When we saw Lalla Ward, for example, she wasn't Romana.TimeLord said:I would assume it was, as you said, because while she is a genius and thus good Dalek material, she refused to give up her humanity.Wilcroft said:It will be interesting to note *why* Oswin was locked up in the room. Was it because she was deemed more insane than all the others for refusing to acknowledge being a Dalek? If not, then why lock her up with all "Doctor-survivor" Daleks? Had she met the Doctor before getting changed, and if so, why didn't she remember him?
SO MANY QUESTIONS!
I think the bigger question is how is the Doctor going to save Oswin when she becomes his companion without screwing with what she did to the Daleks. Oswin said herself that the Daleks have grown stronger in fear of the Doctor, so it's not just his own security against the Daleks the the Doctor would sacrifice by saving Oswin pre-Alaska but the entire universe. While the Daleks may still advance and exterminate, they won't do it to combat the Doctor directly, unless saving Oswin resets what she did, which would be a pointless waste of an episode and an Intersting universe shift she created.
It showed up for 3 (ish) seconds, as scenery. For all they hype they threw around about "every Dalek ever in one episode" they still defaulted to reboot gold and Moffat skittles. I was hoping for some classic design Daleks from long forgotten wars with the Doctor mixed with newer styles and a Special Weapon Dalek that actually moved and talked.LavaLampBamboo said:I think what we are all forgetting is that the SPECIAL WEAPONS DALEK showed up for a second, and that's awesome.
http://www.kasterborous.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/dw-sn25-rembrance-swd.jpg</
As for the episode itself, I really enjoyed it. It really felt like an old school episode, you know? Doctor gets roped into doing something, has to "fight" through a load of Daleks, then does. Simple.
The better comparison would be Freema Agyeman, who played a small part in Doomsday, and was brought back as Martha, who was the "cousin" to explain the similarity.TimeLord said:Fair enough I did not know that. I'm not great with Classic Who triviaSusan Arendt said:Now, be fair. Lalla Ward was literally Princess Astra in one episode and Romana in the next.TimeLord said:True and Karen Gillan played a bit part in 'Fires of Pompeii' before becoming the companion. But that was years apart and it's literally 3 months until the Doctor gets a new companion. It wouldn't make sense to me to use the same actor for two quite large parts in the same series. But then again who knows what goes through Moffat's mind!Susan Arendt said:I think it's hasty to assume that it is Oswin, per se, who becomes the companion, and not just the actress playing someone else. When we saw Lalla Ward, for example, she wasn't Romana.
Actually, I buy that completely. It's not as though it was news to him that she couldn't have children, so it wasn't the infertility per se that was the issue. It was the fact that she could never give him something she knows he wants, and that forcing him to give up that great want would be selfish. Also, being able to bear children is a pretty huge bit of female identity, whether you actually plan on having kids or not, so it's tough to deal with in any kind of rational way. Was she being silly? Well, obviously, given Rory's reaction, and if they'd ever talked everything out, they'd have known that ages ago. But dealing with such emotional issues - even with your spouse, even with someone you've known your whole life - is easier said than done.DVS BSTrD said:The thing that bothered me most was the reason why Amy kicked Rory out. You've known him your entire life but INFERTILITY is the one thing you can't bring yourself to tell him?
Firstly, while it got milked a bit at the end of the episode, the idea of a series based around the idea of "Doctor Who?" has a lot of promise. Since Moff took over one of the underlying currents of the show has been what is The Doctor really like if you strip away the rose-tinted glasses the people of Earth have for him because he likes us. So far we've had:Susan Arendt said:This not only creates a completely new dynamic for the show (which is good, because it was getting a wee bit stale), but also setting up the unfortunate "Doctor who?" line at the end of the episode. Yeah, it echoes the end of The Wedding of River Song (2011) in which "Doctor who?" is revealed as "The first question. The question that must never be answered. The question that" the Doctor has been running from his entire life ... but it's dumb. Yeah, it's a play on the show's title, har, har. It was stupid last season and it's stupid now. I hope they drop that particular shtick soon.
The Pandorica Opens said:A Goblin, a Trickster, a Warrior. A nameless terrible thing soaked in the blood of a billion galaxeys. The most feared being in all the cosmos. Nothing could stop it, or hold it, or reason with it. One day it would just drop out of the sky and tare down your world.
A Good Man Goes To War said:A man who can turn around an army at the very mention of his name. Doctor. The word for healer, wise man throughout the universe. We get that word from you, but if you carry on the way you are, what could that word come to mean? To the people of the Gamma Forests the word Doctor means Mighty Warrior.
In this episode we find out the Doctor doesn't keep his name among the Daleks, but instead is known as "The Predator". I wouldn't be surprised if this is the running theme throughout this series, meeting different species who all have their own name for him either from previous meetings or legend. I would also dovetail nicely into a multi-doctor episode for the 50th anniversary as a case of "We've shown you how other species see the Doctor, now how does he see himself?"The God Complex said:An ancient creature drenched in the blood of the innocent. Drifting in space through an endless shifting maze. To such a creature, death would be a gift.
Ok, that's awesome.DVS BSTrD said:http://i.imgur.com/hiGbF.jpg
That reminds me, previously (more from the books than the TV series), he was known to the Daleks as Ka Fariq Gatri, the Oncoming Storm. (I think he has a similar title in Family of Blood, but can't recall.)Plinglebob said:In this episode we find out the Doctor doesn't keep his name among the Daleks, but instead is known as "The Predator".
He calls himself that at the end of the episode when seeing if the Daleks remember him.ritchards said:That reminds me, previously (more from the books than the TV series), he was known to the Daleks as Ka Fariq Gatri, the Oncoming Storm. (I think he has a similar title in Family of Blood, but can't recall.)Plinglebob said:In this episode we find out the Doctor doesn't keep his name among the Daleks, but instead is known as "The Predator".
Have to say, out of all his various names and titles, The Oncoming Storm is by far the best.The Doctor, The Oncoming Storm, The Predator
This bugged me as well. There are two options:Wilcroft said:Had she met the Doctor before getting changed, and if so, why didn't she remember him?