I can see you are very devout in your own faith, but that does not mean that other people should be denied theirs.Buffoon said:I'm an atheist. I want the entire planet to get rid of religion altogether.
Yeah, you're right. Forget what I said.cuddly_tomato said:Oh come on dude that makes sense.Aardvark Soup said:I'm an athiest... and I don't care. Really, what does this simple line matter? The US is a very Christian nations and logically a lot of their traditions are based on that religion. If Obama himself has no problems with saying this single line, then why should you care?
Wheter you are an athiest, Christian, Hindu or worshipper of the holy teapot, you just shouldn't force your beliefs on other people and be offended by small stupid things.
And since when does anything that makes sense actually become part of the political process?
Untamed Waters said:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090115/ap_on_go_ot/obama_under_god
Title was taken directly from news story.
The gist is some Atheists what "So help me God" taken away from President-Elect Obama's inauguration speech. Thoughts?
this seems to be the best to mexitel said:If Obama believes in God, then having him swear to God makes sense. If he didn't believe in God I would say yeah, don't make him say it, but when someone that believes in God says "so help me God", it means that if they don't keep their promise they'll be letting their god down.
Who believed that the moral lessons inherent in the bible were the best way to build a good and moral nation. They basically wanted to ditch all the superstition, like Jeffersons bible.James Raynor said:Untamed Waters said:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090115/ap_on_go_ot/obama_under_god
Title was taken directly from news story.
The gist is some Atheists what "So help me God" taken away from President-Elect Obama's inauguration speech. Thoughts?
Well remember that it's more symbolic then any real pledge of oath. Like if someone says "OMG" they don't really mean the god part, but it's more or less symbolic. Also when people say this is a christian nation, they forget that this nation was founded by deists.
Religious folk spent well over half a century trying to smuggle God into the Pledge of Allegiance but they kept failing because nobody in Congress cared. Finally, during a time of anti-communist paranoia, Eisenhower helped out because he thought "under God" sounded pretty when Lincoln used it in a speech.Sewblon said:That is nonsense. Religion has always been a part of our nation to a certain extent, "under God" being in the pledge of allegiance for example. If Mr. Obama wants to say it their is no reason why he should not in this case.
Wrong, it was founded by deists.Datalord said:BIG FRICKIN DEAL
America was founded by christians, with chrisitan principles.
Moreover, it doesn't specify which "god" it refers to, it could be Yahweh, or Allah, Or Shiva, or Satan, or a set of arbitrary rules that control the universe
Enh, America was founded by Christians with Enlightenment principles. That's not really the same thing.Datalord said:America was founded by christians, with chrisitan principles.
I couldn't agree more.medievalguy said:Oh my zeus, there is so much ignorance about America's history here it hurts. No, nowhere in the constitution does it mention the state as having to be secular, but ALSO nowhere in the constitution is "god" mentioned. In an age where religious phrases were everywhere, this can't have been anything but deliberate. (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050221/allen)
Yes, the majority of people in this country are christian of one flavor or another, but the next largest group is people who don't subscribe to any religion. There are more people in the US who don't subscribe to a religion than there are Blacks and Asians COMBINED. (See CIA Factbook)It's fair to say that the US is a nation OF christians, but not A christian nation. This fact was illuminated in the Treaty of Tripoli, 1797. Article 11 states "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion" This treaty was passed unanimously (how many times does congress do that?) and many of the founding fathers were present to vote on it.
Furthermore, "Under god" was not added to the pledge until 1954, after a vigorous campaign by the Knights of Columbus, the nation's largest catholic fraternity. It was a successful attempt by the religious to extort the atmosphere of fear rampant in the McCarthy era and wed religion with patriotism. To be against the religion suddenly made you unpatriotic, which was a social death sentence in the 50's.
The "so help me god" part of the inauguration is actually not part of the offical oath. It was became popular after Roosevelt. Only 18 of the 43 presidents thus far have uttered the phrase at the end of their oath.
I think it's funny when people say it doesn't violate the establishment clause of the first amendment because "god" is not religion specific. It is. god = masculine, singular. This automatically excludes polytheists, female centered religions, and the non-theists. Everybody knows it means the judeo-christian god, hell, perhaps even the muslim god, but nobody wants to acknowledge it. It's evident by that little twinge of disgust you would get if they said "so help me Vishnu, or Sheba, or Zeus, or Jupiter, or Kinich Ahau, or Ra, or (insert never ending list of possible imaginary beings here).
I'm sorry if this pisses you off, but non-theists are never going to stop being treated as second class citizens by sitting down and shutting up.
PS. Oh, and not having "god" in the government would not be government professed atheism. It'd be neutral. If the money read "In god we do not trust", that too would be unconstitutional and would have to go. It's just best if the government didn't go there...
They do, don't they? Well, they also said they wanted to seperate church in state, no? Either way, America is made of broken dreams and fail.Random argument man said:For the sake of argument, you guys live in a "free" country. You beleive, say, think and do what ever you like. Isn't a little contradictory to banish one saying?