AvsViews presents: Cemetery Junction

Recommended Videos

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,051
0
41
[HEADING=1]AvsViews presents: Ricky Gervais' Cemetery Junction, a review of the film in celebration of my 10,000th post.[/HEADING][HEADING=2]By: Joseph J. "AvsJoe" Archibald[/HEADING]​

Congratulations on finding this Easter Egg! Happy Easter everyone!​
I caught this film a month and a half ago while babysitting my younger cousins. Because this film wasn't released theatrically in Canada, I had not heard of it. However, I was intrigued by its cast, filmmakers, and plot summary; I also generally enjoy and appreciate English cinema, which usually provides a nice breathe of fresh air from Hollywood without straying too far from it, so I gave it a go. I am reviewing it today in celebration of my 10,000th post; the reason why I chose this film to review rather than any of the 59 movies I've seen since is because it's oddly memorable despite being a relatively average flick.

The story primarily follows 3 young adults just entering the workforce: Freddie, Bruce, and the wonderfully named Snork. They grew up together and are best friends but they are vastly different people. Though all three wish to get out of Cemetery Junction, a working-class neighbourhood, only Freddie takes steps to do so. He comes from a blue-collar family, something the viewers can always see in him, but he yearns to become more upper-class, taking a white-collar insurance job and trying to better his position in life. Bruce, on the other hand, works in a factory making little money. He enjoys alcohol and has a bit of a temper, meaning he makes several trips to the drunk tank. The only reason that he doesn't get in greater trouble for his actions is because the local Sergeant is a friend of Bruce's father, a man whom Bruce despises. There is little to say about Snork except that he's a vulgar little pervert who provides a vast amount of the film's humour.

As the film progresses, you see the characters growing up and growing apart. Freddie's upper-class intentions put him at odds with his family and friends; he instead looks up to his very successful co-worker, Mike, played by Matthew Goode, and his boss, Mr Kendrick, played with the perfect amount of condescending superiority by Ralph Fiennes. Complicating things, he also has eyes for the boss' artistic and travel-obsessed daughter, Julie, a childhood friend whom is currently engaged to Mike. Bruce continues to struggle with the law while trying desperately not to become like his old man. Among other things he gets into multiple fights and gets caught defacing a real estate advertisement. Snork continues fruitlessly trying to get laid but wrestles with his feelings for a homely young waitress.

Conflict is key in Cemetery Junction but the film takes its time with it. Most of the situations and relationships burn slowly but surely, most noticeably when Freddie takes his mates to a posh annual business ceremony that he has been invited to. The scene is quite long but Bruce and Snork gradually disrupt it with their antics and off-colour jokes, much to Mr Kendrick's dismay and in spite of Freddie's efforts to prevent them. It's a great juxtaposition of old vs new values and culture as well as blue- vs white-collar society.

There are a few things worthy of praise in Cemetery Junction. The soundtrack is full of 70's rock classics, the film is shot with the cinematography of the 70's in mind, and English funnyman David Earl steals the show in a small supporting role. The film has many things working against it, though. The previously-mentioned slow-burn pace means that many scenes seem to drag on and because of the sheer number of plot lines, many don't get the attention and/or screen time they deserve. The film's ending also leaves a lot to be desired. But otherwise the film is solid but unspectacular in most respects.

Cemetery Junction is your standard coming-of-age story. That's it. The only thing that separates it from the 15 or 20 coming-of-age stories that Hollywood churns out every year is the fact that it's English and set in the 1970's. It's pretty cookie-cutter as far as these things go; everything in the film is done well, but has been done better in other movies. The actors in the film put out good to great performances, including legendary comedian Ricky Gervais and Watchmen's Matthew Goode, but the performances are not enough to make the film stand out. It's an enjoyable but entirely forgettable movie.

AvsJoe's Rating: Barely squeaked out a 4 out of 5, or B-
Recommendation: Worth a look if there's nothing better on the telly.

Final thoughts: Nothing really. I hope you leave a comment or two and I welcome all criticism, constructive or otherwise. Any tips on how I can improve my style will be greatly appreciated. Thank you all and if I don't see you again, good afternoon, good evening, and goodnight!
I also hope that Marter doesn't get too annoyed that I'm ripping off his style. But, hey, imitation is the highest form of flattery, right?
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
Yay, 10 000 posts! Congratulations!

Okay, since you post on a great deal of my reviews, I feel that I must critique yours. On the whole, it is good. If it's your first review, then it's really good, far better than a lot of first attempts, (especially mine).

There were a couple of things that stood out though:

1. Italicise the film's title, or put it in quotation marks. This just makes it stand out, and it "proper".
2. There is a contradiction between your opening and conclusion. In the opening, you make the claim that it is "oddly memorable", but in the conclusion, you state that it is "entirely forgettable". Which is it?

Apart from those two things, review as solid. You going to write more?
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,051
0
41
Marter said:
Yay, 10 000 posts! Congratulations!
Thanks mate. Congrats on getting your 11,634th post!
Okay, since you post on a great deal of my reviews, I feel that I must critique yours. On the whole, it is good. If it's your first review, then it's really good, far better than a lot of first attempts, (especially mine).
Yep, my first genuine movie review. Thanks.
1. Italicise the film's title, or put it in quotation marks. This just makes it stand out, and it "proper".
Done. Merci.
2. There is a contradiction between your opening and conclusion. In the opening, you make the claim that it is "oddly memorable", but in the conclusion, you state that it is "entirely forgettable". Which is it?
I noticed that when looking it over and left it in on purpose. Cemetery Junction really didn't do anything that deserves to be remembered but for some reason it didn't get lost in the jumble. It really is an "oddly memorable" yet "entirely forgettable" movie. Have you seen this film?
Apart from those two things, review as solid. You going to write more?
We'll see. I'm going to continue posting a review for every 5,000th post but I doubt I'll do this again in the near future. I certainly couldn't do what you were doing for so long, that would either exhaust me or I would kick on my literary auto-pilot, which is big on words yet has little to say.

Anyway, now I'm curious; I gotta go read your first Escapist review. I doubt it's bad, less refined maybe but I can't imagine that it's a poor review.
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
AvsJoe said:
Have you seen this film?
Nope. Hadn't even head much about it until your review. XD

Anyway, now I'm curious; I gotta go read your first Escapist review. I doubt it's bad, less refined maybe but I can't imagine that it's a poor review.[/quote]
It was the one of The Happening -- I'm too lazy to find you a link though.

And I think it's bad, but it still got a decent reception, if I remember rightly.
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,051
0
41
Marter said:
AvsJoe said:
Anyway, now I'm curious; I gotta go read your first Escapist review. I doubt it's bad, less refined maybe but I can't imagine that it's a poor review.
It was the one of The Happening -- I'm too lazy to find you a link though.

And I think it's bad, but it still got a decent reception, if I remember rightly.
It wasn't bad but it lacked your trademark creative flair. Unlike most of your reviews I was kinda bored reading it, though maybe it's because I lack the context; I haven't seen The Happening yet. I skipped it because the twist was spoiled for me and I had heard from multiple people that it was a terrible film.

I just noticed that your Late to the Party Twisted Metal: Head On review was written before your Happening review. I read that one long ago and enjoyed it.
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
AvsJoe said:
It wasn't bad but it lacked your trademark creative flair. Unlike most of your reviews I was kinda bored reading it, though maybe it's because I lack the context; I haven't seen The Happening yet. I skipped it because the twist was spoiled for me and I had heard from multiple people that it was a terrible film.
I think at that point, I was trying to stay as "objective" as possible, and therefore didn't bring in that many opinions or...whatever it is I do now. I wasn't comfortable with film reviewing yet, and I believe that comes through there. Really, I don't think I got any "good" until the "Halloween Week" thing I did, in which I switched how I opened all of the reviews, and ended up...doing something better. XD

I just noticed that your Late to the Party Twisted Metal: Head On review was written before your Happening review. I read that one long ago and enjoyed it.[/quote]
That was a game review. It's different. :p

I've actually only written one game review since starting the film reviews. I should really fix that up and post it sometime...