twistedshadows said:
wouldyoukindly99 said:
That's completley stupid! All consoles should have 100% backwards compatibility so they can still sell their old titles, it's just a stupid business move on Sony's part.
I agree, they probably would have gotten more PS3 sales if they had kept the backwards compatibility, but I think they're still trying to sell PS2s as well. It's all kind of wishy washy and doesn't seem entirely smart.
Mookie_Magnus said:
From what I've heard, when playing a PS2 game on a backwards compatible PS3 isn't as good as playing a PS2 game on a PS2.
Not from what I've experienced.
They were trying to cut the console's costs by removing the PS2 hardware from the PS3 because they were literally putting the PS2 hardware inside the PS3. That added considerable cost. What I don't understand is why they removed the Graphics Synthesizer in the second round of BC revision. That shot themselves in the foot in terms of BC as well as the ability to sell PS2 games on the PSN Store. Also, the removal of the Emotion Engine was supposed to be THE cost cutting measure.
As for my 60gig PS3, playing PS2 games on it is nearly 100% perfect. Games that require oddball peripherals sometimes don't work, but I haven't thrown a game at the system that just used the regular controller that the PS3 couldn't play.