I would think that you would be okay with ACII, due to the expansion of gameplay and a much more interesting protagonist.Revnak said:The assassin's creed sequels have all continually disappointed me, not because they are bad, but because they are way too easy. Other than that I can't really think of any.
Comparatively yes, but it was still boringly easy. Just not as boringly easy as the next game, or the one after that. I suppose ACII is in some ways the best of the series for me, but in other ways I still prefer the first.sextus the crazy said:I would think that you would be okay with ACII, due to the expansion of gameplay and a much more interesting protagonist.Revnak said:The assassin's creed sequels have all continually disappointed me, not because they are bad, but because they are way too easy. Other than that I can't really think of any.
I liked the first one the best simply because dicking about the cities was the best part and the novelty grew thin by the next games.Revnak said:Comparatively yes, but it was still boringly easy. Just not as boringly easy as the next game, or the one after that. I suppose ACII is in some ways the best of the series for me, but in other ways I still prefer the first.sextus the crazy said:I would think that you would be okay with ACII, due to the expansion of gameplay and a much more interesting protagonist.Revnak said:The assassin's creed sequels have all continually disappointed me, not because they are bad, but because they are way too easy. Other than that I can't really think of any.
Are you being honest here? Because if you are then wow.Karutomaru said:It's fairly hard to find bad sequels, because in gaming, sequels are almost always BETTER, because they iron out whatever problem previous games had.
I would ignore Karutomaru, according to them, the NES didn't have real games on it.370999 said:Are you being honest here? Because if you are then wow.Karutomaru said:It's fairly hard to find bad sequels, because in gaming, sequels are almost always BETTER, because they iron out whatever problem previous games had.
I woudl throw up good ole Dragon Age 2 as an example of a bad sequel which gutted what made the original great. I like it but it is nowhere near as good as the original and if I'm being honest is a bargain bin buy.
Always? I'm sorry but I struggle to believe that lightning can strike twicce, it is often intensely difficult to recreate what made the original game so good.Karutomaru said:I am. In fact, I rarely start a series with the first game, because the sequels are always better.370999 said:Are you being honest here? Because if you are then wow.Karutomaru said:It's fairly hard to find bad sequels, because in gaming, sequels are almost always BETTER, because they iron out whatever problem previous games had.
I woudl throw up good ole Dragon Age 2 as an example of a bad sequel which gutted what made the original great. I like it but it is nowhere near as good as the original and if I'm being honest is a bargain bin buy.