Battlefield 1943 - first opinions?

[edinflames]

Come on, they had a game named Battlefield 1942. Now they're making 1943.

How can you seriously take this game seriously?

It does look like they ran out of ideas doesn't it?

There are countless wars and settings with vehicles in them that could have been utilised. Korea for example. Instead they have recycled THREE of the many maps in 1942 used an updated engine and have the balls to call it an all new game.

An all new opportunity to spend £39 or $50 more like.

I'm worried by the multi-platform aspect; there may be a loss of depth due to control limitations. Apart from that, the prospect of BF'42 with better graphics and the various BF2 enhancements sounds pretty dang good.
I hope we finally get a 1939 scenario of some sort.

Make that: WILL be a loss of depth

 

[Kukakkau]

Come on, they had a game named Battlefield 1942. Now they're making 1943.

How can you seriously take this game seriously?

Agreed i frowned when i saw the future set game was 2142 - that's just lazy thinking