Hit detection was so bad in BC 2 I remember. The only just recently fixed it a couple of months ago. You want bad spawns? Play Black Ops. The baddest of the bad.xDarc said:
I've been playing BF:BC2 from day one and the only times I have had poor hit detection were when I was on a high ping server -- did you spray like in COD? To pull off mid to long range shots with an assault rifle, you had to fire in single shot. I don't mean to flame, just curious.EcksTeaSea said:
There was regenerating health?Owyn_Merrilin said:
Well, it has the bloody screen effect, and no visible health bar. The bloody screen gradually faded, which suggests to me that it does, in fact, have regenerating health. If the final version turns out to have a proper health bar, I'll feel much happier about the whole thing. The vehicles are good news too, and that suggests there are much larger maps that we haven't seen yet; the map in the video doesn't have room for a jeep, let alone for helicopters, tanks, and fighter jets.captaincabbage said:
It doesn't have to be a shame as long as the regular Battlefield-spiel isn't lost. And I hope it isn't.WrongSprite said:
Oh it looks decent enough, but it's not what most people expect of Battlefield. When people think Battlefield, they mostly think huge, sprawling battles with tanks and jets and you name it. Not small-scale, urban infantry combat, which is what this video shows.KenzS said:
I don't think anyone is claiming that it looks like a bad game, just that it doesn't look like a Battlefield game, in much the same way that Fallout 3 wasn't like the earlier Fallout games. There's a reason why people who have actually played the Battlefield games usually don't lump them in with CoD when discussing modern shooters, and it has nothing to do with the subjective quality of the two series.KenzS said:
DICE has already confirmed the return of jets, prone and 64-player multiplayer for PC. They've also confirmed that they're remaking Kanarkand from BF2.Cowabungaa said:
Of course, I'm just saying these teasers fail a bit. I mean, you'd reckon they show what sets their game apart first instead of well, showing us Medal of Honor/CoD with a sexy paintjob. It just doesn't seem like a clever marketing strategy, they've already sown a lot of skepticism like this.JeanLuc761 said:
Woah, woah, ease up ther cowboy, I never said anything about ammo counters or HUDs or whatever they're doing to manage that, so I didn't want some wall of conversation/vent about it. It's not exactly something that has a giant impact on my gaming.Owyn_Merrilin said:
Everyone gets kills? Not on me, they don't. I'm sorry that you disapprove of the fact that not every game opts to have the hilarious hitscan laser rifles found in Call of Duty, but merely disliking a game mechanic doesn't mean that those who know how to make it work in their favor are, in your words, "mouth-breathers" that would presumably tremble in awe at your skills in a "real" game. If you can't tolerate the idea that maybe taking slow, deliberate shots (as per the real-life handling of firearms, a pattern you'll see further reflected by the need to take bullet trajectory into account when aiming) should impact accuracy, as opposed to being able to snap up the sights and spray thirty rounds in the same 2" MOA spread in one burst, I suggest you find a game that takes the reflex-centric approach to gunfights as opposed to games that rely as heavily on tactical thinking as it does on marksmanship (and you're in luck, because that's almost all of them).xDarc said:
Is that seriously a problem? Bad Comany 2's multiplayer was nothing short of amazing. Probably the best thing for the franchise right now is to keep the same gameplay style until the 2142 RemakeWrongSprite said:
