Battlefield 3's Launch Trailer Highlights Single-Player Story

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
Well Steven Seagal really put his thinking cap on for this one...

I wish they would do more Bad Company that was some silly fun.
 

TheBelgianGuy

New member
Aug 29, 2010
365
0
0
urilukin said:
MARK MY WORDS the story is going to be shit! it is the same old cliché story of EVIL Russians giving nukes to Afghan terrorist to destroy the US.
Actually, I believe Iran is involved as well, seeing one of the multiplayer maps is their capitol.
 

Wrath 228

New member
Aug 26, 2010
196
0
0
NinjaDeathSlap said:
Jonny49 said:
It looks intense to say the least, lots of cool action set pieces. I just hope it isn't too scripted.

Also, and I can't believe I've noticed this, but isn't that the same high-ranked military douchebag from Medal of Honour? The bald guy? I swear it's the same model and voice.
I don't think so. I'm pretty sure he's being voiced (and modeled around) The guy who played that bodyguard in 24 (I can't remember his name).
You're thinking of Glenn Morshower, and that's who I am 99% sure the model and voice for that dude in the trailer is him. :D Funny thing is, he also does the voice of Overlord in the Modern Warfare series.
 

Vrach

New member
Jun 17, 2010
3,223
0
0
-|- said:
Vrach said:
-|- said:
I might buy this if the single player campaign gets into double figures (and I don't mean minutes). I'm not holding my breath though.
Pretty sure it will. MW2 received a lot of negative PR at 6-7 hours. First off, another 3-4 hours of gameplay over MW2 isn't hard to get. Second, I imagine DICE is smart enough not to repeat the same, very obvious to everyone, mistake.
I enjoyed MW, but got burnt with MW2. Not so much the game-play, but the feeling of 'is that it?' when I got to the end. If you are right (and I hope you are) and this comes in at a decent length and reasonable reviews I'll give it a look. I can say the same for MW3 as well as I don't do multiplayer and so don't have any loyalty to either franchise. I just want a good single player experience that I think is good value for money - hopefully this isn't too much to ask.
Well, we are talking about two distinctly multiplayer franchises here, especially in the case of Battlefield that didn't even have a singleplayer campaign to speak out throughout the main series. So yeah, saying "I just want a good single player experience that I think is good value for money" is somewhat similar to saying you just want a good multiplayer experience out of something like BioShock 2.

That said, I'm just saying that in reply to your "hopefully this isn't too much to ask" because it kinda is. Which doesn't mean both companies aren't working towards it anyway. My bet is we'll get a good campaign out of both, why? Because they've both got a lot at stake and they've both had a chance to learn from MW2 length complaints. But in all honesty, considering MW2 was a multiplayer title, I don't think all the raging against it was too fair, especially with all the added benefit of its co-op (and I'm not defending it as a fan, I'm not into MW multiplayer)
 

-|-

New member
Aug 28, 2010
292
0
0
Vrach said:
Well, we are talking about two distinctly multiplayer franchises here, especially in the case of Battlefield that didn't even have a singleplayer campaign to speak out throughout the main series. So yeah, saying "I just want a good single player experience that I think is good value for money" is somewhat similar to saying you just want a good multiplayer experience out of something like BioShock 2.

That said, I'm just saying that in reply to your "hopefully this isn't too much to ask" because it kinda is. Which doesn't mean both companies aren't working towards it anyway. My bet is we'll get a good campaign out of both, why? Because they've both got a lot at stake and they've both had a chance to learn from MW2 length complaints. But in all honesty, considering MW2 was a multiplayer title, I don't think all the raging against it was too fair, especially with all the added benefit of its co-op (and I'm not defending it as a fan, I'm not into MW multiplayer)
I don't disagree with anything you have said. I'm not really raging against either title - if they come out with lacklustre campaigns but great multiplayer then so be it - plenty of people will get enjoyment out of that, just not me but that's fair enough. I guess what I'm saying is that if we do get a good campaign out of both, I'll buy both, but I'm adopting a wait and see attitude rather than pre-ordering (a mistake I made with MW2).
 

Vrach

New member
Jun 17, 2010
3,223
0
0
-|- said:
I don't disagree with anything you have said. I'm not really raging against either title - if they come out with lacklustre campaigns but great multiplayer then so be it - plenty of people will get enjoyment out of that, just not me but that's fair enough. I guess what I'm saying is that if we do get a good campaign out of both, I'll buy both, but I'm adopting a wait and see attitude rather than pre-ordering (a mistake I made with MW2).
Yeah, just to clarify, wasn't saying anything about you, just stating my general attitude at the whole thing. And if you're into playing the singleplayer and singleplayer alone, waiting for reviews/more info on it is definitely the way to go, but yeah, personally, I'm optimistic and think we'll get a fantastic campaign out of Battlefield and probably a good one from MW too (less certain of MW merely because of the Black Ops, God that game was a fiasco in terms of singleplayer)
 

-|-

New member
Aug 28, 2010
292
0
0
Vrach said:
I'm optimistic and think we'll get a fantastic campaign out of Battlefield and probably a good one from MW too
Your optimism is infectious - now I'm looking forward to finding out what the campaign will be like. Come on BF3 don't let us SP'ers down!
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
The Battlefield 3 campaign looks impressive but it might fall flat like other Battlefield ones. But since they've obviously put a bit of effort into making it look good, hopefully that helps the plot too.
 

RobCoxxy

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,036
0
0
It looks like Blops and MW2 had a lovechild with 24 and it was better than all of them.
 

NLS

Norwegian Llama Stylist
Jan 7, 2010
1,594
0
0
The Gentleman said:
So much for the realism approach...

Plus, when and where is this game taking place. the E3 conference demo was said to take place in Iran, but this trailer suggests that it is in Iraq.
Im guessing the campaign moves a bit around and doesn't stay in one country all the time. BFBC2 had single-player missions in Bolivia, Chile, Russia and Ecuador.
What I do know for sure though, is that one of the multi-player missions takes place in Teheran.
 

Avernus

New member
Jun 10, 2009
110
0
0
-|- said:
Vrach said:
-|- said:
I might buy this if the single player campaign gets into double figures (and I don't mean minutes). I'm not holding my breath though.
Pretty sure it will. MW2 received a lot of negative PR at 6-7 hours. First off, another 3-4 hours of gameplay over MW2 isn't hard to get. Second, I imagine DICE is smart enough not to repeat the same, very obvious to everyone, mistake.
I enjoyed MW, but got burnt with MW2. Not so much the game-play, but the feeling of 'is that it?' when I got to the end. If you are right (and I hope you are) and this comes in at a decent length and reasonable reviews I'll give it a look. I can say the same for MW3 as well as I don't do multiplayer and so don't have any loyalty to either franchise. I just want a good single player experience that I think is good value for money - hopefully this isn't too much to ask.
Aside from the single player campaign, I think one thing you may also want to take into account is the co-op campaign (getting very favorable feedback from preview plays). Apparently, the replay value is fairly high since the placement and tactics of hostiles varies on each playthrough. Rather want to see more about it myself.
 

Dyp100

New member
Jul 14, 2009
898
0
0
I'm more intrested in the terrorist bit. I live a bit of plot twist.

Though, even though I'll probably get hate, it's looks WAY too similair to MW2.

They'res Russian terroists, the Marines being the good guys, nukes, conflict in the Middle East, Middle Eastern terroists, people shouting. I mean, this one doesn't even have badarse Brits as the lead character.

Then again, it'll like be more polished, as it is Dice, plus they'll be more variey in the combat. Those god damn jets are so sexy to fly in the beta, it'll be nice to have a giant skybox to play in. Caspian border just didn't have enough space to use them properly.
 

cryogeist

New member
Apr 16, 2010
7,782
0
0
this site is funny...whenever something about BF comes out everyone drools over it and praise EA! and then something about CoD comes along and everyone jumps on the hate train
both games have been going on long enough where neither of them are doing anything different...
 

JeanLuc761

New member
Sep 22, 2009
1,479
0
0
cyrogeist said:
this site is funny...whenever something about BF comes out everyone drools over it and praise EA! and then something about CoD comes along and everyone jumps on the hate train
both games have been going on long enough where neither of them are doing anything different...
I'm not sure that's an accurate comparison. While DICE was off doing the Bad Company spin-off series, it's been 6 years since we've had a "true" Battlefield game. Comparatively, Call of Duty has been getting a new release every single year, and MW1, MW2 and Black Ops have all followed an incredibly similar formula.

Battlefield 3, on the other hand, looks so far removed from the Bad Company series that I cannot say to someone with a straight face "It's just going to be Bad Company 3!"
 

TheSapphireKnight

I hate Dire Wolves...
Dec 4, 2008
692
0
0
I'm loving the parts of the trailers with gameplay, but the cutscenes, not so much. For every bit of gameplay that says "Look, this is gonna be awesome!" there is a cutscene that says "Look at how cliched this overall plot will be.

I think BF3 is going to have the same problem the MoH campaign had. All the on the ground stuff is actually pretty interesting but the in between mission scenes with whoever is in charge will just be super cheezy and detract from the experience.
 

The Critic

New member
Apr 3, 2010
263
0
0
Mr.K. said:
I wish they would do more Bad Company that was some silly fun.
As much as I'm looking forward to BF3, I really wish that DiCE would let their stories have some fun again. The original Bad Company had a fun premise and funny writing; it didn't take itself too seriously, the characters were likable, and, above all, it was just really fun to experience. I'm not saying that BF3's story won't be enjoyable (far from it, by the looks of it), but I do miss the sense of humor and light-heartedness present in Bad Company.