Battlefield 3's single player does not suck

[Kamelmann]

Started extremely high and seems to steadily go downhill from that point.

Pretty much what the quoted fine gentleman says.

The opening mission was pretty damn good, but then it was left down by the later part.

Beautiful graphics wise (first game i've actually played on my new rig) with some good voice work, I just feel that they wanted to be taken slightly too seriously following Bad Company 2 (whose single player I prefer).

TBH though.. whatever faults it has.. it makes up for it with this-> http://youtu.be/eg8Bh5iI2WY?t=9m50s (no idea how to embed this)

youtube = eg8Bh5iI2WY&feature=youtu.be&t=9m50s

remove spaces beside equals signs and enclose the whole thing in square brackets.

..

I love you ;__; Thanks Comrade! Now behold simulated battlefield battleness!

 

[Jonny49]

I really don't think DICE get what makes the campaigns in Call of Duty so good, because lets be honest here that is exactly what they are going for.

They don't seem to understand that Call of Duty is good because half the time it's either being given speed or cocaine, and sometimes both. The game wears the colours of a serious war game, yet has the feel of a Michael Bay film.

Battlefield 3 on the other hand takes notes from how COD controls and it's basic gameplay rules (linear levels, 2 weapons, regenerating health, AI team-mates) but instead of making it like a Michael Bay film makes it more like a "normal" war game, bogged down with military terms and rules that as a player, I couldn't give a shit about. There's nothing wrong with having a game like that, except even by those standards BF3's campaign is kinda boring.