Kind of like Mark Hamill, Carrie Fischer and Harrison Ford?debtcollector said:This is only good news for me. Maybe I've watched the wrong things, but I've yet to see anything to suggest he has any sort of range.
Kind of like Mark Hamill, Carrie Fischer and Harrison Ford?debtcollector said:This is only good news for me. Maybe I've watched the wrong things, but I've yet to see anything to suggest he has any sort of range.
Zing! Point taken. I guess Bendy would fit in, more or less, but....I dunno. Star Wars doesn't usually cast really huge names in for its leading characters. I think I'd rather see a few unknowns than be distracted by a bunch of familiar faces.Johnny Novgorod said:Kind of like Mark Hamill, Carrie Fischer and Harrison Ford?
I think he'd make a better Master. I especially would have loved to have seen that terrifying, magnificent bastard as The Master as a foil to Matt Smith's child-like incarnation of the Time Lord. Then again, I'm one of the six people who liked the Master as played by John Simm. Simm's version being batshit crazy was a nice counter to the gravity of Tennant's superwoobie.canadamus_prime said:Too bad. I just finished watching Sherlock recently and I think he'd have made an interesting Doctor.
Oh yeah, Benevolent Cumberbund had a pretty large following already. Him being named as the villain in Into Darkness is one of the bits that got my attention.Keiichi Morisato said:really? because i never who he was until Into Darkness...
You take that back!SilverStuddedSquirre said:I'm all for MoAr Cumberbatch, but he can't be ALL the peoples.
If people don't like Capaldi (in the role), waiting until he actually has his own episode is merely a formality. Hell, people didn't even wait for 10 to regenerate to start coming up with reasons why 11 was horrible.MarsProbe said:Plus, our new Doctor has not even made his first full appearance yet so it really is a bit soon to be talking about who would play him next.
It'll be a grimdark gritty reboot.LittleWings said:Well of course he wont be in Dr. Who. They only made two films and I'm pretty sure Peter Cushing is dead.
Okay I'll go back to the pedant corner now. Sorry
templar1138a said:That's a shame. Benedict Cumberbatch would have made a great Grand Admiral Thrawn.
And yes, I know Thrawn was most relevant five years after Episode VI and that Episode VII will take place thirty years after that movie, but I also know that Disney is not going to stick to the established timeline of the expanded universe. That's not a gripe, it's just a fact.
Don't believe me? Three words: Death Star conception.
I don't know, the original movie had Alec Guiness and Peter Cushing in it... back then they were considered huge stars. And the prequels had Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor and Christopher Lee in them - also pretty big stars. Again, I don't really see Benedict as a "Star Wars guy" but that's not to say they wouldn't cast someone on charm and name alone.debtcollector said:Zing! Point taken. I guess Bendy would fit in, more or less, but....I dunno. Star Wars doesn't usually cast really huge names in for its leading characters. I think I'd rather see a few unknowns than be distracted by a bunch of familiar faces.Johnny Novgorod said:Kind of like Mark Hamill, Carrie Fischer and Harrison Ford?
Which is part of why Episode VII worries me, since they seem to be determined to cameo every surviving actor from the original trilogy, regardless of how capable they still are.
Absolutely and Martin Freeman should be the next Doctor.Gizmo1990 said:To hell withj him playing the Doctor, after the great voice work he did with Smaug and Sauron I want him to play the Master.
You mean like the fifty thousand different Death Star conceptions that were created both before and after Attack of the Clones?templar1138a said:That's a shame. Benedict Cumberbatch would have made a great Grand Admiral Thrawn.
And yes, I know Thrawn was most relevant five years after Episode VI and that Episode VII will take place thirty years after that movie, but I also know that Disney is not going to stick to the established timeline of the expanded universe. That's not a gripe, it's just a fact.
Don't believe me? Three words: Death Star conception.
i would go as far as calling the star-trek movies decent, they were good sci/fi movies but decent star-trek movies.SilverStuddedSquirre said:I can agree with that, but I would prefer more Sherlock. I like Him a lot, and I am happy to not get over-saturated.canadamus_prime said:Too bad. I just finished watching Sherlock recently and I think he'd have made an interesting Doctor.
I am also glad to hear that SOMEBODY involved with Trek and Wars understands that what these two franchised DON"T need is to share the same actors as well as the same Director. J.J. loves star wars, great. He already made two good star wars movies with Kirk and Spock, let him have the real Wars Universe, more power to him.
If we start getting the same actors though, you can kiss one of the franchises goodbye. I'd bet it's Trek, because Disney can pump enough money into Star Wars to feed Africa for a decade. Maybe we can get a feature length Sherlock Holmes movie with Sherlock Holmes in it, instead of "The Adventures of Tony Stark in the 19th Century," complete with machine-pistols and explosions. Those were fun movies, but Sherlock Holmes they were NOT.
I'm all for MoAr Cumberbatch, but he can't be ALL the peoples.