How about The Seventh Seal? A little bit of make-up, costumes, and a Knight playing chess with Death. Iconic.
This is massive on Special Effects, CGI too.Not Good said:Shaun of the dead!
Why compromise? Why not have both? CGI can be a way to tell a story. What if the story was to be set on the back of a snake flying through space, Special Effect are most definitly needed.crypt-creature said:Sure, good CGI is a wonderful thing. But I'd rather have a spectacular story, with moderate CGI.PurpleRain said:I like the modern CGI though. Sure, people can go nuts with it (Ie Micheal Bay) but it makes all those things we once couldn't do possible. I see nothing wrong with that. Opens new doors for wider story telling, imaginative designs and crations, amoung other things.
A lot of movies use CGI to cover up for the fact that the actual story is lacking, or just so awful its amazing that it ever made it into production to begin with.
But OT, Fantasia. Old style animation at its best.
Right there brosneakypenguin said:I just saw "Princess bride" so i'm gonna go with that.
No special effects at all.Not Good said:Shaun of the dead!
This and Monty Python's movies.zen5887 said:Ong Bak. Tony Jaa has no need for wires, cgi or stunt doubles!
Yeah, Death Proof was bettter than Planet Terror by far and the Australian stunt woman in it was so incredibly attractive in so many waysZand88 said:Death Proof. |D