?The Elder Scrolls? is their legacy, the word scrolls itself is not. It?s not a made up word nor is it someone?s last name. It?s the normal word for a roll of parchment. Could you imagine if someone tried to say the word ?war? was theirs and noone else can use it because they used that word in part of the title of a series?Caramel Frappe said:Scrolls is their legacy, their name brand that everyone recognizes. They feel that if Notch goes with 'Scrolls' too and that becomes highly popular- then there's no significance of the Scrolls title anymore but rather just another popular version. Can you imagine if another show was called 'Disney'?? (Yes I know it's a last name from the man who made Mickey Mouse but still). Disney would get lawyers left and right to take on those who are having Disney as their title as well. So yeah, again I don't blame Bethesda for this.
I like the concept myself that Mojang put out for Scrolls. As it stands, I don't plan to buy Skyrim or any other Elder Scrolls games. Not now.Fensfield said:... I intend to?
He stated Bethesda doesn't have a strong case, and I am inclined to believe. For one, he has plenty to use off the court case that got Langdell shut down. Two, Bethesda can't legitimately claim that people know the Elder Scrolls games by the name, Elder Scrolls. From Morrowind at least it has been: Morrowind, Oblivion, and now Skyrim. Notch can thank Bethesda's publicity department for that last. No case for confusion there. Also there is a third. Gametype. Scrolls is not an RPG, it is not an MMORPG. It is an Online CCG.Baresark said:This is not just "lawyers being lawyers". There is no such thing. They are not acting without a go ahead from Bethesda. Notch is just looking at this as positive as possible. They would need to prove that there is confusion in a court, just like the Amazon/Apple fiasco where Apple tried suing for the phrase, "app store". They couldn't prove the confusion existed so they lost. I am quite sure the same rules would apply. They want to do this to scare him into folding. Whether he does or not is a completely different story. Should be interesting.
Agreed. It isn't worth the energy to hate them. I am disappointed in this kind of move they are making, and I will sorely pity them when it comes around into their face. The fallout* could potentially bite them in the ass so hard, we won't see another game made by them, ever. Though that likelihood is really small given their backers. Zenimax isn't small fry, though they do hide in the shadows quite well.DementedSheep said:I don't hate Bethesda for this but it's stupid.
careful, Bethesda might sue you for using the name "Fallout".samsonguy920 said:Agreed. It isn't worth the energy to hate them. I am disappointed in this kind of move they are making, and I will sorely pity them when it comes around into their face. The fallout* could potentially bite them in the ass so hard, we won't see another game made by them, ever. Though that likelihood is really small given their backers. Zenimax isn't small fry, though they do hide in the shadows quite well.DementedSheep said:I don't hate Bethesda for this but it's stupid.
*:Any puns that occur can be taken as a moment of amusement without detracting from the point of the post. It was honestly unintentional but I'm keeping it there anyway.
FYI, notch is Swedish, not British.Harry Mason said:"Notch, sir..."
"What is it, Nigel? I'm busy swimming blissfully naked in my money-filled swimming pool."
"Well, it's the Fallout 3 people, sir... They're here to see you."
"How quaint! Are they here for my 10:00 massage?"
"I'm afraid it's a bit more dire than that, sir."
Are you suggesting that Swedes are incapable of being named "Nigel" and using words like "quaint?"Arker said:FYI, notch is Swedish, not British.Harry Mason said:"Notch, sir..."
"What is it, Nigel? I'm busy swimming blissfully naked in my money-filled swimming pool."
"Well, it's the Fallout 3 people, sir... They're here to see you."
"How quaint! Are they here for my 10:00 massage?"
"I'm afraid it's a bit more dire than that, sir."
OT: Someone just shot them self in the foot, and I don't think it's notch.
Didn't you know that becoming filthy rich suddenly changes you into a posh Brit, including monocle, top hat and butler? 'Tis true!Arker said:FYI, notch is Swedish, not British.Harry Mason said:"Notch, sir..."
"What is it, Nigel? I'm busy swimming blissfully naked in my money-filled swimming pool."
"Well, it's the Fallout 3 people, sir... They're here to see you."
"How quaint! Are they here for my 10:00 massage?"
"I'm afraid it's a bit more dire than that, sir."
OT: Someone just shot them self in the foot, and I don't think it's notch.
I bolded that just so you can identify for yourself the frivolity involved. Nice to see that a Minecraft related thread doesn't go without the usual 'Notch is lazy' whining.MajorDolphin said:Finish. Minecraft. First. The game has a lot of promise but they're wasting their energy porting it to the Xbox and now this other junk. Millions of people dropped 20 bucks on a beta and all that money goes towards other development. Great way to piss off the fans...
Buy new Vegas. Its made by obsidian (only published by Bethesda). 120% better writing than anything Bethesda could even dream of putting out, Despite what the Beth fanboys say about it having a "Worse Story" and "'forced' replay Value".theriddlen said:Well, if Bethesda wants to stay neutral in my mind they better think twice before trying to do something to Notch. I really want to buy New Vegas.
I haven't seen anyone saying that.. do people say that?5t3v0 said:Despite what the Beth fanboys say about it having a "Worse Story" and "'forced' replay Value".
You HAVE to be kidding. While I'll agree that I like the Elderscrolls series, and that Bethesda can do some good story-writing and they make good character-building systems, as a development company, they are horseshit. Every game they have ever put out. EVERY GAME. Has been a buggy pile of shit outside of the aforementioned good character-building and interesting stories. If Bethesda were a pen-and-paper RPG company, I'd be right there with you saying that they are the bee's knees. As video game developers though, they are terrible. As the mantra goes; Bethesda makes the game, and the community fixes the game.MrJKapowey said:I still won't care. Bethesda is still awesome.
well I'm not sure if it was a Beth Fanboy, but a while ago there was this article that was posted about "Why fallout 3 is better than new Vegas" and the guy who posted it said everything that was obviously his opinion as fact. Those 2 things were part of the list. All of his points were void by anyone who has any sense as well.Pandabearparade said:I haven't seen anyone saying that.. do people say that?5t3v0 said:Despite what the Beth fanboys say about it having a "Worse Story" and "'forced' replay Value".
Because that's moronic. About the dumbest thing I can imagine anyone saying about New Vegas. New Vegas had some really serious problems, but the story wasn't among them.