THIS.Blitzwarp said:From a biological standpoint: I don't know if I agree with the "everybody is a little bit bisexual" standpoint. I certainly don't disagree with it, but I do think there are people who are 100% heterosexual, male or female, just as there are people who are 100% asexual. I also don't think that anybody who states they are 100% heterosexual ought to be judged, either. It's no better or worse than coming down on somebody for saying they're homosexual or bisexual.
Kinsey scale, right?Talal Provides said:Most people are at least a little bi. People who are 100% straight/gay are very, very rare.
I cant help that dudes are unattractive. if guys were attractive, they'd be women.Valdrec said:I think the only factor "blocking" someone is how open minded they are.
Potentially, everyone is compatible, but a person's opinion will stop them. It's possible to change your opinion and become more or less open minded about the idea.
There's also some research that suggests a person's chemical buildup can affect what sexuality you start with, but I don't think this stops you from opening to other possibilities.
Well what would you do if a guy you thought you might be able to have some kind of fun with approached you and offered you, say, a blowjob?Spacelord said:That raises the question of how that'd work in practice, you know? In my admittedly rather limited experience there's a certain gradation of intimacy as time progresses, you know first you kiss, then you go further from there. You can't go up to a guy in a bar and go like "hey wanna go out back and blow eachother?"...wolfchylde said:Um... you DO know that leaves a WHOLE lot of other sexual options in there, right? I know plenty of 'heteroflexible' guys who don't kiss... And even a few guys who'll HAPPILY kiss another guy, but it wouldn't go any further than that (which confuses the everliving fuck out of me)Spacelord said:I whole heartedly support the pragmatism of bisexuality: you're basically doubling your chances! That said I'm not sure I could ever deal with making out with a dude so it's mostly a sideline sort of support.
Wait, no, actually I think you totally could.
Thing is all the men I do find attractive are way, way out of my league. Case in point:
![]()
![]()
This is some BULLSHIT
And since my standards for the ladies are a lot more realistic I'm afraid I'm going to have to stick with girls. I think I'll live though!
Hope there is enough room in there for me too. I don't even like porn that has guys in it. turns me off.Talal Provides said:Then you belong in a museum.ActionDan said:Why are people saying that everyone is bi, even if it's a little? I have NO sexual or romantic feelings towards men. I am not a bisexual. Simple as that.
I seriously doubt that. First of all because I've never made out with a guy or anything (and haven't had any trouble not doing so) but mainly because the scale says homosexual BEHAVIOR and not homosexual urges. If someone is outspokenly saying they aren't gay, I would think that they would go out of their way to not act on any homosexual tendencies they might have. Also, people who are completely celibate wouldn't even be accounted for on this scale regardless of actual orientation.Arawn.Chernobog said:An "Exclusively Heterosexual" individual is just as rare as an "exclusively homosexual" one.
Go Kinsey Scale.
![]()
A lot of people touting to be "strict straights" are actually 1s or 2s.
It's so wrong it's one of the most respected Psychological advances of the 20th Century.Yog Sothoth said:Forgive me for the double post, but that chart is so wrong, I don't even know where to start...
Outside of that, I agree with everything else you say.
I might suggest you take some of your own advice. I've seen a couple of folks here now who have asserted that 100% gay/lesbian or straight people are in the minority, citing the Kinsey scale. I got curious about this, because it didn't sound right to me, so I followed this link that was posted earlier: http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.htmlwolfchylde said:-snip!-
Don't be **** bro, try some reading comprehension, it works wonders.
I believe this speaks for itself, unless your reading comprehension is poor.Interviewing people about their sexual histories, the Kinsey team found that, for many people, sexual behavior, thoughts and feelings towards the same or opposite sex was not always consistent across time. Though the majority of men and women reported being exclusively heterosexual, and a percentage reported exclusively homosexual behavior and attractions, many individuals disclosed behaviors or thoughts somewhere in between.
...
There is no 'test.' The scale is purely a method of self-evaluation based on your individual experience, and the rating you choose may change over time.
I agree in saying more people are at the very least a 1. I'm not gay nor bi, but I can appreciate an attractive male. @ActionDan, if you've seen p0rn with a guy in it, I think that counts as being a 1.Arawn.Chernobog said:An "Exclusively Heterosexual" individual is just as rare as an "exclusively homosexual" one.
Go Kinsey Scale.
![]()
A lot of people touting to be "strict straights" are actually 1s or 2s.
-snip-
It was a great start, but that research doesn't begin and end with Kinsey. Much has been built on the foundation that he laid down. Also, there is a great deal of psychology that we still don't understand, and there are even those in the scientific community who question the validity of psychology as a 'science' at all.Thespian said:It's so wrong it's one of the most respected Psychological advances of the 20th Century.Yog Sothoth said:Forgive me for the double post, but that chart is so wrong, I don't even know where to start...
Outside of that, I agree with everything else you say.
The Kinsey Scale is not without it's flaws (flaws namely being that it only goes horizontally, not vertically) but it is a highly effective representation of the various shades of human sexuality.
That seems to describe a lot of it. Though I think a fair amount is simple misunderstanding. Straights don't get gays. Nobody gets bis.Fawcks said:"I don't like bi's".
All I can say is, you have no idea how to troll on the internet, because you failed at the very beginning: you were the first to get worked up. So fuck off and lurk more.wolfchylde said:See, I WASN'T insisting you were gay, but now? Based on the knuckle-dragging knee-jerk reaction you just gave? Yeah, yer a closet case, probably can see Narnia from where you're at. Say Hi to the White Witch for me, k?GrungyMunchy said:Are you still insisting that I might be gay and I just don't know it or don't wanna face it? Could you be any more of an idiot? What if I came to you and said "yeah, you think you're gay but really you are straight"? That would be pretty stupid wouldn't it? So why are you insisting on this?
Why exactly is your real life experience more valid than mine, you self-centered shithead? And why are you saying I don't know everything about myself, and then claim stuff about me when you don't even know me? I talked several times with my friends about this, who I know for more than a decade. And yet you come as a fucking pretentious moron and start making assumptions about my friends? Could you be anymore of a crying *****, with all your caps locks and your projections of your opinion? Seriously, get the fuck out. What an idiot.
Also: umad bro?
The Kinsey Scale does not solve everything =/= The Kinsey Scale is wrong.Yog Sothoth said:It was a great start, but that research doesn't begin and end with Kinsey. Much has been built on the foundation that he laid down. Also, there is a great deal of psychology that we still don't understand, and there are even those in the scientific community who question the validity of psychology as a 'science' at all.
@ yog, startThespian said:It's so wrong it's one of the most respected Psychological advances of the 20th Century.Yog Sothoth said:Forgive me for the double post, but that chart is so wrong, I don't even know where to start...
Outside of that, I agree with everything else you say.
The Kinsey Scale is not without it's flaws (flaws namely being that it only goes horizontally, not vertically) but it is a highly effective representation of the various shades of human sexuality.