BioWare Teases a New Mass Effect in Development

Rastrelly

%PCName
Mar 19, 2011
602
0
21
There is no ME after ME3. It has ruined entire setting for me. Why would I bother if some space magic can hop out any moment? ME is no longer sci-fi, and, even worse, it's no longer a solid setting.
 

erykweb

New member
Apr 1, 2011
19
0
0
Rastrelly said:
There is no ME after ME3. It has ruined entire setting for me. Why would I bother if some space magic can hop out any moment? ME is no longer sci-fi, and, even worse, it's no longer a solid setting.
The way I see it, the worst mistake they made was not including the Leviathan DLC storyline in the main game. That reconciles pretty much everything you dislike about the ending- what many people don't like about it. Instead it leaves you to try to infer thing you could not possibly know.
Chris Tian said:
FinalFangs said:
I'm guessing that the new mass effect will take place in a different galaxy. That way they can create new races and ignore the ending. It looks nice so far, but I would have liked to see a bit more, even if it was just a title, but it gives me something to look forward to.

MarsAtlas said:
a) Take place prior to Mass Effect (1), which could even span prior to human first contact, so it gives them a lot to work with.
I think there is no way the next Mass Effect will take place in either a new Galaxy or prior to the Human First Contact. In a new Galaxy it would practically be a new IP and have almost nothing in common with the previous games, they would never do that. Bioware most likely wants the fans to instantly recognize alot of things about the game and feel reminded about the previous titles to sell copys to anybody who liked one of the previous games.

I feel the same way about a game where you wouldn't be able to play as a human or in which humans have no big role at all. They couldn't make covers/posters/trailers/whatever with some 30something brown haired white male being the main focus for a game like that.
Now that we have seen the renders from that short trailer, we know that it takes place in our galaxy after first contact. The armor was N7, so there are humans. From the look of the tech on the armor, it also seems like it is post first contact war, but also seems to be much more like the N7 from the ME3 multiplayer than the ME1 armors, which suggests that it is at the same time or after the events of ME3.
 

Smiley Face

New member
Jan 17, 2012
704
0
0
michael87cn said:
Sequel Prequel or Spin off? That's all that matters, really.
Well put. More than pretty much any other game, my anticipation for ME4 will be decided by the question of how they plan to continue the series. There's a lot of good ideas they could go for, and a lot of bad ones as well. Until that happens, anything more than a short teaser with music+logo+vague date is just going to frustrate me.
 

Pr0

New member
Feb 20, 2008
373
0
0
ME4 on the Frostbite engine?

Call of Battle Effect Duty 4 then I suppose. I expect this to be about 10 hours of story and an advertised "hundreds of hours of engaging multiplayer online play!"

I forsee this being a prequel based in the First Contact Wars, giving us a good excuse to run around shooting each other in online matches pretending like the game is actually Mass Effect when we know it isn't.

Seriously...fudge EA and fudge BioWare. Done with both of them. I don't even play COD and I'm buying COD:Ghosts and the upcoming Advanced Warfare preorder just to spend my money ELSEWHERE.
 

E the Weasel

New member
May 5, 2011
10
0
0
Personally, I'd be happy if my character finally remembers about their biotic/tech powers in cutscenes instead of just whipping out the worst pistol in the universe...
 

Gordon_4_v1legacy

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,577
0
0
Well, I'm torn boys. On the one hand, overall, I really love Mass Effect. I mean I really, really love the shit out of it. Conversely, until I found the ME3 Happy Ending mod, playing to the end felt kind of draining. I liked the expanded Control Ending, but Synthesis was bullshit both times, and Destroy just felt like you were trying your best to ape Battlestar Galactica about despising synthetics and that they should all die.

So, either you declare a couple of the endings non-Canon, or you're going to have to set this so far into the future that the impact of any of those decisions is lost. Sounds like a lose/lose scenario to me.
 

Sanunes

Senior Member
Mar 18, 2011
626
0
21
Gordon_4 said:
Well, I'm torn boys. On the one hand, overall, I really love Mass Effect. I mean I really, really love the shit out of it. Conversely, until I found the ME3 Happy Ending mod, playing to the end felt kind of draining. I liked the expanded Control Ending, but Synthesis was bullshit both times, and Destroy just felt like you were trying your best to ape Battlestar Galactica about despising synthetics and that they should all die.

So, either you declare a couple of the endings non-Canon, or you're going to have to set this so far into the future that the impact of any of those decisions is lost. Sounds like a lose/lose scenario to me.
I don't think those are their only two choices with either deeming things non-canan or fast forward the game that much. I think they could look at what a player decided to choose and then in the opening recap like they did for Mass Effect 2 and Mass Effect 3 explain why it changed from the initial outcome at the end of the game or what the game warned might happen and then never mention it again in the game.
 

EXos

New member
Nov 24, 2009
168
0
0
Power of the new consoles... Haha.

Lets see how much EA is going to mess the new ME up. They talk about new character but I'll bet my rear end that sheppard and the gang will be slotted right back in...
 

putowtin

I'd like to purchase an alcohol!
Jul 7, 2010
3,452
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Damn it Bioware, you can't throw that fucking music at me and then one of the first things you say is 'We ask what the fans want.'
They can't play that music then show Casey Hudson!

I nearly spat tea at me monitor!
 

Texas Joker 52

All hail the Pun Meister!
Jun 25, 2011
1,285
0
0
I'm honestly conflicted. I mean, I knew there were 'rumors' about a new Mass Effect before now, and by 'rumors' I mean some pretty blatant statements that, hey, they'd probably be making another one, but this announcement gives me mixed feelings.

On the one hand, I love Mass Effect as a whole. Flawed as it may be, I love the galaxy, the races, the lore. I loved the characters that populated it, the ships were cool, the guns were fun, and the powers were neat. It was a universe I really got into. So I'd love a game that captures that again.

On the other hand are those aforementioned flaws. Given how they wrapped up the last game (No, I'm not bitter. Much.), if it's a direct sequel, it'll be particularly difficult. Do they make an ending canon? Do they set it long enough for the ending to not matter? Do they retcon and acknowledge their mistake? If not, when do they set it? Who is the player character?

There are too many questions without answers, and given that the people responsible for the most glaring... Flaws of the series are apparently going to be involved leaves me on the fence.

I just hope that they take the time to think it through, and consider what kind of feedback they'll get before pushing to release. I would hate for history to repeat itself.
 

JayDeth

New member
Dec 18, 2009
138
0
0
You already ruined Mass Effect, BioWare. Blue alien porn has forever lost it's luster now.
 

CloudAtlas

New member
Mar 16, 2013
873
0
0
Silentpony said:
NO. No no no no no no no no no no no no no!
What Mass Effect fans told you was to pull your heads out of your *sses and f*ing do a Commander Shepard story right. The last, literal LAST, thing the fans want to see is a whole new set of characters and places with absolutely no connection to the amazing, beautiful characters we fell in love with.

I don't care about any new characters you think can shape up to Shepard, Liara, Tali, Garrus, Kaidan or Ashley.(Those simply being my favorites, not knocking the others) They can't shape up. We've had 3 amazing games to get to know these people, and you think you can recapture the fans love and loyalty(read: money) by stapling on 'Mass Effect' to your phoned-in project?
This maybe the LAST thing YOU might want, but please don't claim that this is what ALL Mass Effect fans want. I doubt it is even a majority. In fact, I remember hearing many sighs of relief after the announcement that "Mass Effect 4" will let Shepard rest in peace and tell a new story.

Mass Effect's characters were fairly good, but let's not pretend that they and their arcs were without flaws and no other character could ever hope to live up to them.

You want to tell a completely original space themed bioware story with nothing to do with Shepard? Fine, great, more power to you. Just don't call it Mass Effect and pretend we don't see the writing on the wall.
Why not? The games were called "Mass Effect", not "Shepard's Story".

We don't want to see some new guy/gal running around doing absolutely f*ck all while we are searching, praying, practically begging for knowledge about what happens to the Normandy, the crew and Shepard at the end of ME3.
I think I can call myself a fan of Mass Effect, and I am not begging for any of that. Nor am I the only one who doesn't.

It would do you you well to not conflate your personal opinions with those of everyone else, and consider other points of view than your own. You seem to be wishing for a specific kind of experience, but this wish isn't shared by everyone.
 

Cabisco

New member
May 7, 2009
2,433
0
0
I know so many of us are/were pissed off at the ending and with good reason but considering how amazing Mass Effect was up until that end I'm willing to give them a second chance. It is by far my favourite videogame universe and it's a credit to bioware they made it as rich as they did, just like say Star Wars there is more than enough room for different stories other than Shepards.
 

Dragonbums

Indulge in it's whiffy sensation
May 9, 2013
3,307
0
0
That has got to be the most desperate fucking PR video I have ever seen in my life. And from the looks of the comments under the video, a lot of people aren't buying it.

It's like despite their denial they know for a fact that they basically shit and soiled the very fanbase that supports them. Now they are desperate to get their trust back.

That's literally what this trailer is. It's not a fucking teaser. It's a bunch of dudes talking in front of a camera with shots of them in dark rooms filled with posters of Thane and friends. Nothing to even remotely tell us anything meaningful. Fuck not even the name of the game is given out.

Walk that talk Bioware. Walk that talk. Last time we went on your word you rewarded us with Day 1 DLC.
 

ScorpionPrince

New member
Sep 15, 2009
105
0
0
Hmm, wasn't there only one true ending? (Destroy) While the other choices were mere illusions? Even with the sort of galaxy wide EMP, isn't the knowledge of building VI still intact?

Anyway, A good Mass effect 4 for me would be one focused on exploration of new planets, meeting interesting (and not necessarily humanoid) characters with procedurally generated planets along with designed sections, vehicle exploration, and perhaps, some spaceship battles as well?

Anyway, we won't know until much later, but it definitely has potential.
 

RavingSturm

New member
May 21, 2014
172
0
0
EA is never wrong! lol. Seriously though, ME should take some pointers from Alpha Protocol in terms of how much control the player has over the ending/scenario outcomes. I can definitely get behind the accusations that ME2/3 was GOW w/o the chainsaws. I wish ME4 would be some sort new Dark Age type of scenario; no galactic federation type of thing going on.
 

Michael Tabbut

New member
May 22, 2013
350
0
0
Lee Medcalf said:
Just spitballing here, but if you wanted to get around all the possible variations and permutations of the state of the galaxy post ME3 yet set a new story within the same timeline and universe, then I would find a way to isolate the characters in some way and keep them away from the events of ME3 as far as was practical. Now obviously whichever ending you chose (and I'm not going to get into the merits or otherwise of the endings that discussion has been done to death) has to be a starting point but if you isolate your characters by say making them the crew of a ship stuck out on the edge of the galaxy when the Mass Effect relays were blown up / disabled by the Crucible and unable to contact or fast travel back to council space, then you avoid having to create variations beyond three basic starting points...

The control starting point might not change anything as you'd only see Reapers when you reach council space

The destroy starting point takes Geth and Ai / VI out of the story

The Symbiosis starting point is a graphical change and some extra dialogue with the crew trying to work out what's happened to them.

The genophage storyline, the quarian / Geth conflict and other story lines have all happened but the isolated crew, lost and alone on the edge of the galaxy travelling at light speed rather than using relays are unaware of any of this. Hell they might not even be aware of the reapers hitting earth...

It gets around most, if not the majority of, decisions made, it exists alongside ME1-3 and it opens up exploration as a key element to the game as the crew try to get home unaware of what awaits them.
That's actually rather sound. Sort of a quasi Star Trek Voyager/Stargate Universe scenario taking place during or shortly after the end of ME3. Allows the developers to focus on new stuff while maintaining the fact you are still in the Mass Effect universe