So why on Earth do we continue to refer to ourselves and other people like this? It doesn't make any sense at all. Wouldn't it be more correct to refer to black people as brown-skinned people and white people as light-ish pink-skinned?
On a side note I remember seeing some camera crew making a nature documentary run into some tribe deep in the Amazonas that had never seen white people before. The natives used a lot chalk paint on their skin and seemed to think the crew was completely covered in the stuff. The black guy at front kept brushing his finger against the crew leader's arm and wondering why nothing came off XDRyQ_TMC said:And we say "black" and "white", because we take our preconceptions from Mediterranean cultures, whose interaction with dark-skinned people was mostly through North Africans (and native North African tribes have very dark skin), and first reaction was probably "holy shit, look how dark this guy's skin is!"
Under old terms, the north Chinese person would be Mongoloid race whereas the Indian would either Dravidian or a form of Caucasian depending on what part of India they came from, however those terms aren't used much any more. More accepted nowadays to simply to refer to them as "East Asian" and "South Asian".Unia said:I remember having this conversation before at arts class. There was a "flesh pink" color that didn't really match anyone. I could well start calling darker skinned people "burned sienna" or w/e but that makes me pink...and I HATE PINK. The term "olive-skin" was a mystery to me until I found out there are brown olives X)
With all the racism going on it's hard to have objective names for human races anyway. Wish they'd be seen more like dog breeds or something - you know, without in-breeding for purity and such BS. Black (African) and white (Caucasian) are still easy, but what do you call a typical resident of India vs. resident of northern China? Both Asian, although they're not that much alike.