Blizzard Doesn't Like Overwatch Porn

Frankster

Space Ace
Mar 13, 2009
2,507
0
0
Not gonna lie, kinda pissed some pics/gifs I liked disappeared over night.
Dunno about that reddit user, but was following some hum.. "3d artists", and their overwatch stuff just vanished into nothingness, with no backups in some cases, which is a true tragedy for all of humanity.

Just goes to show, if you stumble across some pr0n pic or whatever, download it before it gets taken down for a whole myriad of reasons. To this day there are still some pics and vids I remembered stumbling across years ago that I just can't find anymore.

Maybe this is my calling, my destiny... To gather and collect all kinky pics, gifs and vids that exist on the webs and store them for the sake of future generations.
 

bartholen_v1legacy

A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
Jan 24, 2009
3,056
0
0
I gotta admit, I kinda love everything about this. First Blizzard stating that they specifically aimed to NOT sexualize the female characters (mistake #1), then the whole Tracer butt thing happened (mistake #2) and now they're going after porn based on their game (mistake #3). The whole thing has gone boomerang, and is now hitting Blizzard back in the face (not that I'd assume they care from atop their massive piles of money they're raking in). I just adore the irony of a game which was specifically meant NOT to sexualize first becoming famous for sexualization related issues, and now being on its way to becoming the most sexualized game of all time.
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
RaikuFA said:
Might not matter in a month if the game can't grab everyone's appeal.
You say that like Overwatch wasn't a huge success even prior to it's release, and like they didn't actually run out of physical copies of the game. The game is a monster by just about any metric imaginable. It's sold a ton, even after a week long open beta that would have killed the game if people didn't like it.

Perhaps you're thinking of Battleborn?
People were saying the same about Titanfall. It was "so good" and now barely anyone plays it. In a month it'll be filled with pros that will beat any newcomers.
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
Frankster said:
Not gonna lie, kinda pissed some pics/gifs I liked disappeared over night.
Dunno about that reddit user, but was following some hum.. "3d artists", and their overwatch stuff just vanished into nothingness, with no backups in some cases, which is a true tragedy for all of humanity.

Just goes to show, if you stumble across some pr0n pic or whatever, download it before it gets taken down for a whole myriad of reasons. To this day there are still some pics and vids I remembered stumbling across years ago that I just can't find anymore.

Maybe this is my calling, my destiny... To gather and collect all kinky pics, gifs and vids that exist on the webs and store them for the sake of future generations.
And then when you're 80 you'll ask yourself "what the fuck was I doing with my life?"

They're just porn pictures. Let it go.
 
Oct 22, 2011
1,223
0
0
Huh, weird. I don't remember Blizz complaining about porn based off their previous games. And there surely are tons of that stuff.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
bartholen said:
I gotta admit, I kinda love everything about this. First Blizzard stating that they specifically aimed to NOT sexualize the female characters (mistake #1), then the whole Tracer butt thing happened (mistake #2) and now they're going after porn based on their game (mistake #3). The whole thing has gone boomerang, and is now hitting Blizzard back in the face (not that I'd assume they care from atop their massive piles of money they're raking in). I just adore the irony of a game which was specifically meant NOT to sexualize first becoming famous for sexualization related issues, and now being on its way to becoming the most sexualized game of all time.
I mean, you can say that's biting Blizzard in whatever body part you wish, but to me it just looks like gaming culture is making itself look petty and petulant again.

Say what you will about how "mistaken" Blizzard is to strike out to make non-sexualised characters, they're not the ones who look like they're throwing a temper tantrum to the outside world.
 

Frankster

Space Ace
Mar 13, 2009
2,507
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
And then when you're 80 you'll ask yourself "what the fuck was I doing with my life?"

They're just porn pictures. Let it go.
When I said "not gonna lie, am kinda pissed", I guess I should have expected to be taken literally.

On an unrelated note, I'm probably gonna be asking myself "what the fuck was I doing with my life" no matter what I do by the time im 80 anyways.
 

Hairless Mammoth

New member
Jan 23, 2013
1,595
0
0
Yeah, this looks like an IP issue, rather than a "stop sexing up our characters" issue. A third party, on behalf of Blizzard, is going after people using assets directly from the game and hitting them with DMCA notices. [small](Now, where have we heard this before?)[/small] They are probably only focusing on the porn to make sure no one assumes Blizzard themselves made or endorses bare Tracer butt. I'd rather see this issue be ignored, since someone will always find a way to sexual anything in creative media, even a brick, but they strategy of keeping the uninformed massed from associating official-looking smut with what the game really is about makes sense.

Although, I draw the line there. If they start going after the sexy fan-art, I'm gonna be angry. Good images for my home PC's desktop background are rare finds already. (Also if the takedowns succeed, it could set a nasty precedent against even the family friendly kind of fan art.)
 

Imperioratorex Caprae

Henchgoat Emperor
May 15, 2010
5,499
0
0
Something Amyss said:
bartholen said:
I gotta admit, I kinda love everything about this. First Blizzard stating that they specifically aimed to NOT sexualize the female characters (mistake #1), then the whole Tracer butt thing happened (mistake #2) and now they're going after porn based on their game (mistake #3). The whole thing has gone boomerang, and is now hitting Blizzard back in the face (not that I'd assume they care from atop their massive piles of money they're raking in). I just adore the irony of a game which was specifically meant NOT to sexualize first becoming famous for sexualization related issues, and now being on its way to becoming the most sexualized game of all time.
I mean, you can say that's biting Blizzard in whatever body part you wish, but to me it just looks like gaming culture is making itself look petty and petulant again.

Say what you will about how "mistaken" Blizzard is to strike out to make non-sexualised characters, they're not the ones who look like they're throwing a temper tantrum to the outside world.
I don't see how this is negatively affecting Blizz in any way (not the porn, the situation with the takedowns). They've taken a stance against their assets being used, which is not a wrong approach.
Some of the community though? Yeah they're the ones coming out looking like asses. It reminds me of Blizz putting the hammer down on content in custom SC2 maps, and how people lost their entitled minds about it.
 

Tsun Tzu

Feuer! Sperrfeuer! Los!
Legacy
Jul 19, 2010
1,620
83
33
Country
Free-Dom
Well they're doing a piss-poor job of it.

[small]Not that I went looking for said Overwatch porn after seeing articles like this.

Not that I found a treasure trove of Widowmaker x Everyone porn.

Not that I got uncomfortably aroused by said Widowmaker x Everyone porn.

Not that I saved any of said Widowmaker x Everyone porn.

Not that I currently have a tab open with said Widowmaker x Everyone porn.

Not that I-[/small]
 

flying_whimsy

New member
Dec 2, 2009
1,077
0
0
crimsonspear4D said:
flying_whimsy said:
I'm looking forward to seeing what studio fow does: that'll probably really piss off the lawyers.
Same thing he always does, sadly. I don't imagine him coming up with anything other than woman gets caught, women gets raped, women either get's mind broken and submits or barely makes out by the skin of her teeth. Either way, standard hentai fare.
I get what you mean, which is why I edited my post like a couple minutes after I posted it (surprised you responded to it before that, honestly); I was thinking more in terms of scale and complexity. If Blizzard's lawyers are going this agro over some looping gifs, imagine what they'd do in response to something of the length and complexity of fow's stuff. I hate all the monster rape stuff they do; which is a shame because if you're going to do two full-length features for dead or alive hentai, you'd think they'd focus on the fun volleyball games rather than the rapey demon ninja gaiden stuff.

I took a look around the various sfm creators' blogs today (which is something I never thought I'd do, too much rape and futanari for my taste) and there is definitely an icy chill in the air because of Blizzard's actions. Kind of scary to see, really. Granted, it seems like the major offenders were using original game assets, so this may all just be much ado about nothing.

It's funny, I never even knew there was porn like this before a couple months ago; I wonder how many more people will be introduced to it because blizzard (rightly-ish) got its feathers in a ruffle.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Imperioratorex Caprae said:
I don't see how this is negatively affecting Blizz in any way (not the porn, the situation with the takedowns). They've taken a stance against their assets being used, which is not a wrong approach.
Some of the community though? Yeah they're the ones coming out looking like asses. It reminds me of Blizz putting the hammer down on content in custom SC2 maps, and how people lost their entitled minds about it.
It kinda gets worse in my opinion when you consider how much porn is still out there for Overwatch. Someone mentioned Widowmaker and I couldn't remember which one she was because I couldn't care less and probably wouldn't remember it existed if people didn't keep making a big deal out of it. Case in point, Tracer's the only one I can remember because apparently her butt pose being changed ranks up with the Holocaust (given people were using "First They Came"). Anyway, third image on my screen was Widowmaker porn. And there was plenty more. In fact, it seemed like "Widowmaker Overwatch" got me more porn hits than not. And Blizzard seems unconcerned unless it's in-game assets being used.

This reaction seems so absurd when it can be treated as an "I dropped my ice cream cone!" "sweetie, we'll get you another one." "I don't want another one! I want that ice cream cone!" argument. Worse, it was never really "my" ice cream in the first place.
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
All I thought of when I heard this was "well you will make most of your female characters look like they are about to do a set at the local gentleman's club".

What is it with skin tight and women? I'd buy artistic freedom, if it wasn't for just about every female character, in just about every game for the last 3 or 4 generations looking kinda sorta the same, more flesh on show than covered.

That's just me though, write a better character than show me her goodies!
 

Gengisgame

New member
Feb 15, 2015
276
0
0
omega 616 said:
What is it with skin tight and women? I'd buy artistic freedom, if it wasn't for just about every female character, in just about every game for the last 3 or 4 generations looking kinda sorta the same, more flesh on show than covered.

That's just me though, write a better character than show me her goodies!
Let's be honest, I don't think you really care about there backstories.

What isn't with people demanding that female characters can't simply be visually appealing, nope every single female character must have a deep background and cover up.

Buddy most characters don't have deep backgrounds, not every character can be a Dr Evil henchman.

That aside I think they do have detailed backstories for every Overwatch character
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
Gengisgame said:
omega 616 said:
What is it with skin tight and women? I'd buy artistic freedom, if it wasn't for just about every female character, in just about every game for the last 3 or 4 generations looking kinda sorta the same, more flesh on show than covered.

That's just me though, write a better character than show me her goodies!
Let's be honest, I don't think you really care about there backstories.

What isn't with people demanding that female characters can't simply be visually appealing, nope every single female character must have a deep background and cover up.

Buddy most characters don't have deep backgrounds, not every character can be a Dr Evil henchman.

That aside I think they do have detailed backstories for every Overwatch character
You're right I don't care in the case of over watch ... I'm more bothered that I am treated like a caveman. "We kind of have to dress the ladies in skimpy clothes, otherwise the guys wont play as them". I know, I'm a SJW, amirite?

In any game you can "dress"/design females in hundreds of clothes (women have WAY more clothing options than men) but nope, every one of them has just got out of the ocean after either surfboarding or scuba diving.
 

CritialGaming

New member
Mar 25, 2015
2,170
0
0
omega 616 said:
You're right I don't care in the case of over watch ... I'm more bothered that I am treated like a caveman. "We kind of have to dress the ladies in skimpy clothes, otherwise the guys wont play as them". I know, I'm a SJW, amirite?
Actually it has been researched and shown that people generally wont play ugly characters. Sex has nothing to do with it. The least popular characters are what is widely considered to be "ugly". Dwarfs in WoW for example. More people play the cute little gnomes than their slightest bigger yet far uglier dwarven friends.

And when was the last time you made a fucking disfigured monster of a character in any game, and then completed the game with that character? Sure you can make a fucking nightmare face Commander Shepard in Mass Effect, but once you're done laughing, I bet you turn around and make a more normal Sheppard to actually play the game.

Of course there are a few people who are the exceptions. But that only proves the rule. Man or woman, people perfer to play pretty people in games. It is human nature and has nothing to do with being SJW.

I still don't understand why finding things attractive is something to be ashamed about. We are so ashamed that we belittle ourselves for it, and we belittle content creators for making such content. "How dare you make a pretty man that I enjoy looking at? How dare you make me want to see him shirtless? You heathen!"

Come on, the outcry is because Western culture has been raised for generations to repress sexuality. Yet with how good our computer graphics have become, we are starting to see video game characters attractive in the same way we see actors in television and movies attractive.

It both arouses and scares people, and with that comes bias and rage.

Eventually we will grow up. Maybe.

I hope.

We wont.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,575
7,210
118
Country
United States
CritialGaming said:
omega 616 said:
You're right I don't care in the case of over watch ... I'm more bothered that I am treated like a caveman. "We kind of have to dress the ladies in skimpy clothes, otherwise the guys wont play as them". I know, I'm a SJW, amirite?
Actually it has been researched and shown that people generally wont play ugly characters. Sex has nothing to do with it. The least popular characters are what is widely considered to be "ugly". Dwarfs in WoW for example. More people play the cute little gnomes than their slightest bigger yet far uglier dwarven friends.
Which would be a good argument except for Reaper, Bastion, Junkrat, Torbjorn, Reinhardt, Roadhog, and Winston.

So, where's the ugly/inhuman lady again?
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,575
7,210
118
Country
United States
MrCalavera said:
Huh, weird. I don't remember Blizz complaining about porn based off their previous games. And there surely are tons of that stuff.
Eh, the've shut down Warcraft related porn before, usually live action and "literally uses the WoW models" stuff.

Seeing as the drawn and "not Blizzard's actual model" stuff alone, I figure they're just trying to protect their trademarks on their character designs. It's weird, but if they don't it's possible they could lose the trademarks and Tracer could be in some rando's game without having to pay up to Blizzard.

Kinda like how Xerox spend a lot of time, effort, and money making sure people were "copying" papers instead of "xeroxing" papers. If it became too commonplace, Xerox would've lost the trademark on the word "Xerox", and somebody like Samsung could make "Xerox machines" and "Xerox printers".
 

CritialGaming

New member
Mar 25, 2015
2,170
0
0
altnameJag said:
Which would be a good argument except for Reaper, Bastion, Junkrat, Torbjorn, Reinhardt, Roadhog, and Winston.

So, where's the ugly/inhuman lady again?
No it isn't a good argument for those characters and I'll tell you why. Ugly doesn't apply if that ugly is covered up or in the form of a monster which would be Winston in this case.

Of the six characters you list, only one of them real can classify as an "ugly" character. And it kind of depends on what you consider ugly.

In game, there is nothing to suggest Reaper is an ugly character, he is completely covered up by a badass costume and there fore falls under the "badass" exception.

Junkrat is not ugly. He has creepy manerisms, but he isn't ugly. He's skinny, he's perfectly lean and chiseled with a nice 8-pack of abs. He is attractive in much the same ways as people like the Joker, although a little more physical.

Torbjorn is technically not even a dwarf. He stand about 5' tall according the pictures where he stands side by side with other people. In fact he is barely shorter than Mercy. But he is the best example of a non-attractive man in the game. Big ass nose, short, fat gut, way too much facial hair. He is the very opposite of what mainstream media says is attractive in a man.

Roadhog doesn't quite qualify in the same way. Because he is very tall, has big strong arms, and there is no proof that his face is a train wreck. But he does have a big fat belly, so do sumo wrestlers. Sumo dudes bring in all kinda of ass though, so...attractive?

Reinhart is an older man, but he is big and clearly strong as fuck. Nothing unattractive about him. Unless you count his armor, in which case you have Pharrah, so there already is a girl version of him.

Bastion is a fucking robot! It has no sex, it could be male or female, who the fuck knows? Bastion is a OP asshole though, so there is that.

As for your ugly/inhuman lady. Widowmaker. I mean, blue skin might do it for you I guess. What about the chubby buddy Bae Mei? Cute face so she doesn't count? How about Zarya's crazy big muscles. I mean she's the girl version of the Terminator. So there you go, that's three of the females who are not perfectly pretty and shit. But because they aren't "ugly" enough, what I say wont actually matter. Just remember there is a shit ton of Roadhog rule 34, so clearly someone likes the muffin man.

But look I'm not getting into this debate again. There are other threads that have pages of "why no Fugly bitches" all over the place. Bottom line is this, the girls are hot because mass appeal. More people want hot chicks and hot dudes than ugly ones. Badass exceptions apply. But you are more likely to get a chick in a badass costume or armor set, then you are to get a female analog of Francis.

What people don't understand is this is business, it isn't a personal attack against anyone. These companies are no longer in it for the love of the game, they're in it to make a bunch of fucking money and clearly that shit is working. So people can scream and cry until the cows come home but business will always win. Investors don't care if the minority of fans were happy with a game, they care about their stock investment getting bigger.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,575
7,210
118
Country
United States
CritialGaming said:
Roadhog doesn't quite qualify in the same way. Because he is very tall, has big strong arms, and there is no proof that his face is a train wreck. But he does have a big fat belly, so do sumo wrestlers. Sumo dudes bring in all kinda of ass though, so...attractive?
Bit of a reach.
Reinhart is an older man, but he is big and clearly strong as fuck. Nothing unattractive about him. Unless you count his armor, in which case you have Pharrah, so there already is a girl version of him.
You wot m8?
As for your ugly/inhuman lady. Widowmaker. I mean, blue skin might do it for you I guess.
Color changed Orian Slave Girl.
What about the chubby buddy Bae Mei? Cute face so she doesn't count?
Wait, a few healthy pounds and you try and put her on the "ugly/inhuman" list? Yikes.
How about Zarya's crazy big muscles. I mean she's the girl version of the Terminator.
Yes, straight women everywhere thought Arnold Schwarzenegger was hideous.
So there you go, that's three of the females who are not perfectly pretty and shit. But because they aren't "ugly" enough, what I say wont actually matter. Just remember there is a shit ton of Roadhog rule 34, so clearly someone likes the muffin man.

But look I'm not getting into this debate again. There are other threads that have pages of "why no Fugly bitches" all over the place. Bottom line is this, the girls are hot because mass appeal. More people want hot chicks and hot dudes than ugly ones. Badass exceptions apply.
(male only, terms and conditions apply.)
What people don't understand is this is business, it isn't a personal attack against anyone. These companies are no longer in it for the love of the game, they're in it to make a bunch of fucking money and clearly that shit is working. So people can scream and cry until the cows come home but business will always win. Investors don't care if the minority of fans were happy with a game, they care about their stock investment getting bigger.
Out of curiosity, before Blizzard revealed Tracer's altered victory pose, what was your opinion?