CriticKitten said:Remember back when Blizzard was trying to convince us that turning Diablo 3 into a game that relied heavily on Always-On DRM would make the game more secure from hackers? And remember how they told us that Battle.net was just so secure and that there was no way that hackers could get in and interfere with your gameplay, even as numerous people reported that accounts were being hacked and relieved of items in Diablo 3?
Pepperidge Farm remembers. And so do I.
While I don't normally wish harm upon anyone and I feel very sorry for the poor gamers who has entrusted Blizzard with their information, I have to be honest: Blizzard deserves every last bit of this. They were the ones boldly proclaiming that Diablo 3 was the next step in hacker-free gaming, arrogantly presuming that their Battle.net system could not be hacked, and using the DRM as a platform to make more money through the Auction House. This is what kills good studios: steps towards money and away from quality.
Turn back now, Blizzard. You're going down a path that leads to EA-ism: a blind focus on corporate interests and money-making over quality assurance and putting care into your products. Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny!
Err...not really. Some hackers are in it to make money, absolutely, and most significant attacks like the one on Sony certainly are rooted in money, but a huge number of them are only in it for the sport, to test their abilities, etc.NuclearShadow said:The goal in the end is to make money. Perhaps they didn't quite get far enough to do so this time but that is the ultimate drive. Even hackers cannot resist the benefits of capitalism.Ranorak said:This is why we can't have nice things.
Blizzard fan or not, I don't see why those selfish hackers have to ruin things so much for others.
When's the last time you ever seen a virus simply try to be nuisance and cripple a machine instead of stealing and spying? Capitalism it works, for hackers too!
'Cause it's easier to blame something that you can put a face on.MysticToast said:Like they just left all the info out in the open.Dendio said:I'm tired of hearing company after company get hacked. If they want us to continue to use credit cards in confidence they need to protect our information!
When something like this happens, why does everyone always assume it's the company's fault?
Sadly, I know WHY they do it.NuclearShadow said:The goal in the end is to make money. Perhaps they didn't quite get far enough to do so this time but that is the ultimate drive. Even hackers cannot resist the benefits of capitalism.Ranorak said:This is why we can't have nice things.
Blizzard fan or not, I don't see why those selfish hackers have to ruin things so much for others.
When's the last time you ever seen a virus simply try to be nuisance and cripple a machine instead of stealing and spying? Capitalism it works, for hackers too!
Not sure if you're joking/trolling, but those emails and websites aren't from Blizzard.Beautiful End said:Eh, I don't play Blizzard games. Nothing against them, I guess, but I'm just not a PC gamer.
However, I gotta say I'm glad. Hopefully they'll improve their security.
It might be a bit out of topic but I keep getting these emails from Blizzard saying my account was under investigation or something because of botting or scamming or whatever. I don't have a Blizzard account for the reason listed above! I keep trying to reply to them to tell them to gtfo but when I try to do so, it takes me to the official Blizzard customer support page and asks me to login to contact them.
It kind of defeats the purpose, you guys!
I say. An antelope nibbling the hoops. Blizzard ought to improve their tinny security measures across the pond.Charli said:EU Battle.net, still a secure fortress?
*sips apple juice out of a brandy glass on a rotating chair*
'Apparently' they took data that wouldn't allow them instantaneous access so my guess is they're going to sell it to gold farming companies or decoders. It would be a monumental task but it needs you to go onto your account and change the info or you'll just be bombarded with phishing scams and attempts on your account (which hopefully with the authenticator will fail but there's enough kids out there for it to affect).
But yeah, *sigh* get ready for a fresh wave of gold sellers/farmers on your realms. Sorry US.
*sigh* There is more than one way to skin a cat, you know. My point was that anyone with a decent PR department will be able to handle this and it'll be old news quickly. It was a stab at Sony.Ashannon Blackthorn said:Yes like how their CEO wrote a huge blog, and posted it to every conceiveable means of online communication Blizzard has. Yep, certainly buried.LetalisK said:And because Blizzard is a company with a half decent PR department, this will be promptly buried.
Kind of a logical fallacy. Strategy A fails once, therefore is entirely ineffective? Hell it took 'em 3 months to get information that apparently doesn't even give access to an account.CriticKitten said:Remember back when Blizzard was trying to convince us that turning Diablo 3 into a game that relied heavily on Always-On DRM would make the game more secure from hackers? And remember how they told us that Battle.net was just so secure and that there was no way that hackers could get in and interfere with your gameplay, even as numerous people reported that accounts were being hacked and relieved of items in Diablo 3?
Pepperidge Farm remembers. And so do I.
While I don't normally wish harm upon anyone and I feel very sorry for the poor gamers who has entrusted Blizzard with their information, I have to be honest: Blizzard deserves every last bit of this. They were the ones boldly proclaiming that Diablo 3 was the next step in hacker-free gaming, arrogantly presuming that their Battle.net system could not be hacked, and using the DRM as a platform to make more money through the Auction House. This is what kills good studios: steps towards money and away from quality.
Turn back now, Blizzard. You're going down a path that leads to EA-ism: a blind focus on corporate interests and money-making over quality assurance and putting care into your products. Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny!
A keychain authenticator is no more secure than a software authenticator. Both use a secret sauce, a serial number, and a timer which are hashed to generate psuedorandom strings of numbers. If you have the secret sauce, serial, and know the method used to hash the sauce, serial and timer then you have the keys to the kingdom.Charli said:I can say with a straight face, yes.sir.rutthed said:I notice it says nothing about the keychain authenticators. Can we take that to mean that those of us with them are less at risk then the mobile authenticator users?
*pats keychain*