BlizzCon 2010: Blizzard Announces Final Diablo 3 Class

Mythrignoc

New member
Oct 17, 2009
77
0
0
Torchlight was a slightly less lame version of FATE. Unfortunately, the game was broken and the only class worth while was the Alchemist with that beam attack that seriously just slaughters all.

with magic of curse...
I find this statement awesome.

Serris said:
she hunts demons. i think demon hunter is a pretty logical name.
I fry eggs in the morning. I guess that makes my class "Egg fryer" until noon every day.

I prefer flavor over logic and ingenuity over pragmatism. As stated before, a demon hunter in diablo 3 is cyclical redundancy in my book. Otherwise the other classes would be called Anger-management lunatic, death/nature user, magick user, and fancy kicker.


Come to think of it, I would very much like to see a class called The Anger-management lunatic. That just sounds wonderful.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
rembrandtqeinstein said:
Bah PVP....You would think Blizzard would have leaned by now...I'll use caps and bold in case they are listening.

"YOU CANNOT BALANCE BOTH PVE AND PVP SIMULTANEOUSLY"

Stop shoehorning PVP into every game to satisfy the 2% of the playerbase that enjoys it.
Sure you can. You just need to realize that they don't have to follow the same set of rules. This is how most games manage such a feat.

I mean, look at Starcraft. The single player game (that represents the PVE portion) may be functionally identical to the multiplayer segment but they use different rules, stats and units. Sure the game plays similarly in both, and the units still fill the same roles, but by throwing out the notion that you need to balance some aspect simultaneously for both PVE and PVP the game benefits.