I can't wait to play this game. In like 2 years, when I can finally justify buying a PS4. No one game is worth the several hundred dollars to buy a system when there is nothing else I would do with it.
Care to offer any actual meaningful information or counterpoints with that insult, or is this just "stop liking things I don't like"?Schmeiser said:Dude you are so misinformed you made me laugh out loud.
Parries really aren't that hard. Their difficulty is generally drastically decreased in this game, at least to me. They're not essential either. I finished the second boss almost purely by timing the axe's charged strong attack. And the healing item is actually stupidly common. The cap is only 20 and you can farm 4 guaranteed from a couple of guys close to the first 'bonfire' you reach. There's also silver bullets farmable very close by as well.major_chaos said:No blocking, pary mastery is 100% essential, all defense reliant on dodging (Which in souls has never been "dodging so much as timing your Iframes to clip through the attack),only one healing item and it's noxiously rare, significantly reduced RPG elements (is there even any armor drops, or are you stuck with the goofy coat?), and reduced variety severely limiting your ability to play with different builds? Yea no thanks, I'll wait and see how Scholar of the First Sin turns out for my souls fix. Bloodborn IMO represents the series going in exactly the wrong direction and giving up a lot of what I enjoyed in the process.
I absolutely disagree with the setting being bad but that's (on the face of it) a preferential point. I love the gothic setting, it has me enthralled. However I don't think it's fair to be this brand of negative to a setting until you've experienced it. Souls games are heavily into their atmosphere. Bloodborne has it in spades. If you think it's just going to be a lackluster, trope heavy plod through Van Helsing world...Well, if anything the DKS settings were getting a little dull for me.Ishal said:Everything I've seen so far hasn't grabbed my interest.
- Sick-dark Victorian fantasy, basically Van Hellsing. Yharnam looks interesting, but not as interesting as DKS. It just seems to lack the variety that made DKS interesting.
- Less weapon variety than the previous Souls games ("but this isn't a Souls game" Yes it is.) means less room for interesting builds
- Less content than the previous Souls games, likely due to the Chalice dungeon procedural stuff that frankly shouldn't even be in a game with devs renowned for their level design
- Fast gameplay encouraging R1 spam. Even if it's well timed, it's still R1 spam.
- Frame skips in several areas.
- 30fps. Honestly of all the Souls games that shouldn't have had it, it's this one. Fast jumping around and dodging should be in 60fps. Especially on a "next gen system" cough* cough*
- Speaking of that, finally a game that makes a PS4 worth it. That took, what? 15 months? It's finally not a PS3 remake machine. Congratulations.
I hope everyone enjoys it. As it really is a good thing to finally have something of worth on the PS4. But I can't justify buying a console for just one game. After playing on consoles for almost my entire life up until a few months ago, I can't go back.
It's not anger, it's more frustration than anything. I would have liked to buy BB, eventually. But having watched it streamed for the past few days, I'm just not taken in by it.Hugga_Bear said:That's...you seem a little angry about this, I'm not sure why. It appears to be a superlative game, agreed. I think it's a shame it's not on PC at release but I think that of any exclusive, I don't like exclusivity; it necessitates exclusion. I will get a PS4 almost solely for Bloodborne. Madness? Not really, I can't afford a gaming PC (no, I really can't) and there are other games on PS4 I'd love to dabble in. It's not just for Bloodborne but Bloodborne sways me. Of course, I'll wait a little longer to hear some trusted reviews. One must be careful not to get taken in by the shiny.
Yeah, except no.Ishal said:Fast gameplay encouraging R1 spam. Even if it's well timed, it's still R1 spam.
Weird, guess I must have imagined seeing bosses stunlocked by shotgun parries then R1'd to death.Casual Shinji said:Yeah, except no.Ishal said:Fast gameplay encouraging R1 spam. Even if it's well timed, it's still R1 spam.
Against regular mooks you can maybe get away with spamming R1, and that's only if there's one or two of them. Everything else, spamming R1 is only good for a quick death. You don't use your quickstep and shotgun properly and you'll just be banging your head against a wall.
Yes, shotgun parried... Meaning not the R1 button. As well as these parries only working if you perform them right before a strike hits. Strikes that kill you in two or three hits and are very hard see coming. And let's not forget the stamina gauge not allowing you to spam the R1 attack at all. You also don't have infinite ammo with the counter locking at 20 for the blunderbust, at the start of the game anyway.Ishal said:Weird, guess I must have imagined seeing bosses stunlocked by shotgun parries then R1'd to death.Casual Shinji said:Yeah, except no.
Against regular mooks you can maybe get away with spamming R1, and that's only if there's one or two of them. Everything else, spamming R1 is only good for a quick death. You don't use your quickstep and shotgun properly and you'll just be banging your head against a wall.
It's fine, your opinion seems genuinely considered and informed so really I don't think there's much I could say, I think our personal enjoyment factors of the game appear different but in fairness I'm pretty much in love with the Souls games and their approach.Ishal said:It's not anger, it's more frustration than anything. I would have liked to buy BB, eventually. But having watched it streamed for the past few days, I'm just not taken in by it.Hugga_Bear said:That's...you seem a little angry about this, I'm not sure why. It appears to be a superlative game, agreed. I think it's a shame it's not on PC at release but I think that of any exclusive, I don't like exclusivity; it necessitates exclusion. I will get a PS4 almost solely for Bloodborne. Madness? Not really, I can't afford a gaming PC (no, I really can't) and there are other games on PS4 I'd love to dabble in. It's not just for Bloodborne but Bloodborne sways me. Of course, I'll wait a little longer to hear some trusted reviews. One must be careful not to get taken in by the shiny.
There are several things about it that either don't click, or plain rub me the wrong way. I see several things about it that remind me of DKS II. And to see people praising them here, but criticizing them in DKS II just feels like hypocrisy. But, I'm not going to get into that here. If you want to know what I mean, we can continue on that via PM.
As to the topic of console exclusivity. I used to be primarily a console gamer. I finally was able to set aside funds to build a gaming rig. It did cost me quite a bit, (once you add in the other things like Monitor, keyboard etc) so I'm not going to tell people if they think they don't have the money to build one. Though, I will say when the consoles first came out, you could certainly build a PC that outperforms them for less.
It all comes down to preference. I just don't see a reason to own a console, and now that BB hasn't grabbed me like I thought it would, there is pretty much zero reason. Other than a Wii U, that offers a different experience, I'll stick with PC. The games are more to my interest, my tastes have shifted.
This video is an in depth analysis of the state of consoles, and why some people are opting out.