Bloodborne Review - Full of Dark Souls

Dec 10, 2012
867
0
0
I can't wait to play this game. In like 2 years, when I can finally justify buying a PS4. No one game is worth the several hundred dollars to buy a system when there is nothing else I would do with it.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,314
0
0
Schmeiser said:
Dude you are so misinformed you made me laugh out loud.
Care to offer any actual meaningful information or counterpoints with that insult, or is this just "stop liking things I don't like"?
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
I waited patiently after work till midnight. I was talking to my girlfriend... than I said I have to go. I was tired, so I figured I would play an hour or so then hit it again after work tonight. I ended up being up till 4 playing and still not wanting to quit. I stopped... woke up at 9 like usual... almost entirely skipped the gym so I could play, but thought better of it. Now I'm at work and all I can think about is going back and playing tonight. It's so damn good.
 

Sleepy Sol

New member
Feb 15, 2011
1,831
0
0
major_chaos said:
No blocking, pary mastery is 100% essential, all defense reliant on dodging (Which in souls has never been "dodging so much as timing your Iframes to clip through the attack),only one healing item and it's noxiously rare, significantly reduced RPG elements (is there even any armor drops, or are you stuck with the goofy coat?), and reduced variety severely limiting your ability to play with different builds? Yea no thanks, I'll wait and see how Scholar of the First Sin turns out for my souls fix. Bloodborn IMO represents the series going in exactly the wrong direction and giving up a lot of what I enjoyed in the process.
Parries really aren't that hard. Their difficulty is generally drastically decreased in this game, at least to me. They're not essential either. I finished the second boss almost purely by timing the axe's charged strong attack. And the healing item is actually stupidly common. The cap is only 20 and you can farm 4 guaranteed from a couple of guys close to the first 'bonfire' you reach. There's also silver bullets farmable very close by as well.

Suffice it to say, I'm not having trouble keeping my resources full.

But yes, RPG elements are reduced a bit, and stats are streamlined. 'Armor' sets are still a thing, but there's no 'heavy-ish' armor as far as I know. Honestly, I don't mind the streamlining of stats considering I generally only focused on 2 or 3 stats for builds in Dark Souls 2 anyways.

It's a different direction, for sure, but it's still very much worth your time. It feels wonderful.

[sub]oh, and there is a shield to block...but it's a bit of a joke[/sub]
 

Machine Man 1992

New member
Jul 4, 2011
785
0
0
What turned me off the Souls series was that it din't tell you anything (which would get any other game raked over the coals for), controlled like ass, and had no pause button.

Does Bloodborne do any of that?
 

Hugga_Bear

New member
May 13, 2010
532
0
0
Ishal said:
Everything I've seen so far hasn't grabbed my interest.

- Sick-dark Victorian fantasy, basically Van Hellsing. Yharnam looks interesting, but not as interesting as DKS. It just seems to lack the variety that made DKS interesting.
- Less weapon variety than the previous Souls games ("but this isn't a Souls game" Yes it is.) means less room for interesting builds
- Less content than the previous Souls games, likely due to the Chalice dungeon procedural stuff that frankly shouldn't even be in a game with devs renowned for their level design
- Fast gameplay encouraging R1 spam. Even if it's well timed, it's still R1 spam.
- Frame skips in several areas.
- 30fps. Honestly of all the Souls games that shouldn't have had it, it's this one. Fast jumping around and dodging should be in 60fps. Especially on a "next gen system" cough* cough*
- Speaking of that, finally a game that makes a PS4 worth it. That took, what? 15 months? It's finally not a PS3 remake machine. Congratulations.

I hope everyone enjoys it. As it really is a good thing to finally have something of worth on the PS4. But I can't justify buying a console for just one game. After playing on consoles for almost my entire life up until a few months ago, I can't go back.
I absolutely disagree with the setting being bad but that's (on the face of it) a preferential point. I love the gothic setting, it has me enthralled. However I don't think it's fair to be this brand of negative to a setting until you've experienced it. Souls games are heavily into their atmosphere. Bloodborne has it in spades. If you think it's just going to be a lackluster, trope heavy plod through Van Helsing world...Well, if anything the DKS settings were getting a little dull for me.

I agree that there are fewer weapons however I think the variety has improved. One of my biggest beefs with DKS 1/2 were the weapon choices, on the face of it you had dozens of cool weapons to select from, in reality they were mostly extremely similar with several being objectively superior for whatever purpose. My characters ended up with different weapon types but usually the same spells/weapons. After a dozen or so runs and a hell of a lot of PvP and experimenting I had my weapon sets down. Bloodborne has trimmed some excess fat in that regard. I wish there were more choices but at least these choices are more meaningful.

I don't know yet (obviously) and I don't know how you seem to know but it is claimed to have ~Demons Souls content without the Chalice. Besides which it comes down to what the content is. In fact I find the word content misleading. I can't remember the times for my DKS characters but I know that my second run was 1/4 the time of the first run, maybe a little less. The games aren't massive, they're dense. The content is beautiful and enticing (or indeed, should be) and I personally enjoy running through it many, many times with different characters in different covenants doing different stuff. If the gameplay is amazing (and Bloodborne...ho boy) then I'll play the content repeatedly. If it sucks (FFXIII) then I struggle to give it the content it claims to possess...Just because a game claims size doesn't mean it'll be reflected in how much you play it. I've played Dark Souls 1 and 2 more individually than I've played Skyrim and Skyrim has vastly more 'content'.

I don't get what you mean about R1 spam, I mean I get the statement but it's not going to be present. The same could have been said of previous Souls' games. "Spam R1 with the correct timing to win!" You might get through the game like that (your timing must be excellent) but it's misleading. There are items (and they're more useful than normal in Souls games), you switch weapon style regularly (well, I do), you can have a firearm and there are other attacking buttons. Furthermore if you take that mentality into the PvP (and it's a Souls game, the PvP is a HUGE part of it) you'll get annihilated every time.

I don't know about frame skipping, I had hoped for 60fps and I do agree that of all the Souls games thus far this is the one where it might really matter, 1 and 2 and Demons didn't need it really. Bloodborne appears quick enough that it would be better in 60, probably. I still think fps is one of the most absurd arguments in gaming at the moment and that the difference is practically negligible unless you're in comparison and easily adjusted to regardless but it is a slight, very slight shame.

That's...you seem a little angry about this, I'm not sure why. It appears to be a superlative game, agreed. I think it's a shame it's not on PC at release but I think that of any exclusive, I don't like exclusivity; it necessitates exclusion. I will get a PS4 almost solely for Bloodborne. Madness? Not really, I can't afford a gaming PC (no, I really can't) and there are other games on PS4 I'd love to dabble in. It's not just for Bloodborne but Bloodborne sways me. Of course, I'll wait a little longer to hear some trusted reviews. One must be careful not to get taken in by the shiny.
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,177
0
0
Hugga_Bear said:
That's...you seem a little angry about this, I'm not sure why. It appears to be a superlative game, agreed. I think it's a shame it's not on PC at release but I think that of any exclusive, I don't like exclusivity; it necessitates exclusion. I will get a PS4 almost solely for Bloodborne. Madness? Not really, I can't afford a gaming PC (no, I really can't) and there are other games on PS4 I'd love to dabble in. It's not just for Bloodborne but Bloodborne sways me. Of course, I'll wait a little longer to hear some trusted reviews. One must be careful not to get taken in by the shiny.
It's not anger, it's more frustration than anything. I would have liked to buy BB, eventually. But having watched it streamed for the past few days, I'm just not taken in by it.

There are several things about it that either don't click, or plain rub me the wrong way. I see several things about it that remind me of DKS II. And to see people praising them here, but criticizing them in DKS II just feels like hypocrisy. But, I'm not going to get into that here. If you want to know what I mean, we can continue on that via PM.

As to the topic of console exclusivity. I used to be primarily a console gamer. I finally was able to set aside funds to build a gaming rig. It did cost me quite a bit, (once you add in the other things like Monitor, keyboard etc) so I'm not going to tell people if they think they don't have the money to build one. Though, I will say when the consoles first came out, you could certainly build a PC that outperforms them for less.

It all comes down to preference. I just don't see a reason to own a console, and now that BB hasn't grabbed me like I thought it would, there is pretty much zero reason. Other than a Wii U, that offers a different experience, I'll stick with PC. The games are more to my interest, my tastes have shifted.

This video is an in depth analysis of the state of consoles, and why some people are opting out.

 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,162
4,927
118
Ishal said:
Fast gameplay encouraging R1 spam. Even if it's well timed, it's still R1 spam.
Yeah, except no.

Against regular mooks you can maybe get away with spamming R1, and that's only if there's one or two of them. Everything else, spamming R1 is only good for a quick death. You don't use your quickstep and shotgun properly and you'll just be banging your head against a wall.
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,177
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
Ishal said:
Fast gameplay encouraging R1 spam. Even if it's well timed, it's still R1 spam.
Yeah, except no.

Against regular mooks you can maybe get away with spamming R1, and that's only if there's one or two of them. Everything else, spamming R1 is only good for a quick death. You don't use your quickstep and shotgun properly and you'll just be banging your head against a wall.
Weird, guess I must have imagined seeing bosses stunlocked by shotgun parries then R1'd to death.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,162
4,927
118
Ishal said:
Casual Shinji said:
Yeah, except no.

Against regular mooks you can maybe get away with spamming R1, and that's only if there's one or two of them. Everything else, spamming R1 is only good for a quick death. You don't use your quickstep and shotgun properly and you'll just be banging your head against a wall.
Weird, guess I must have imagined seeing bosses stunlocked by shotgun parries then R1'd to death.
Yes, shotgun parried... Meaning not the R1 button. As well as these parries only working if you perform them right before a strike hits. Strikes that kill you in two or three hits and are very hard see coming. And let's not forget the stamina gauge not allowing you to spam the R1 attack at all. You also don't have infinite ammo with the counter locking at 20 for the blunderbust, at the start of the game anyway.

If being able to shotgun-stun and R1 slash even the first Boss into submission is considered spamming attacks, I'd like to know what you actually define as skillful.
 

DarkhoIlow

New member
Dec 31, 2009
2,531
0
0
I'm in the same boat as "I won't be buying this unless it comes on PC". There is little chance of that happening..I didn't mind playing Demons's Souls..guess Bloodborne will be a pass as well.

I invested in a 980 for a reason -> I want to play games on my PC at 60fps and higher resolutions.

I don't want to pay 460euro for a game just because Sony are hogging BB all for themselves and doensn't want more money from other fanbases on other platforms..their loss, because I don't see many people buy a PS4 just to play a game (there aren't any more noteworthy AAA exclusives that are coming out on PS4 this year so whats the reason to invest in a PS4 again? Please do tell me).
 

Hugga_Bear

New member
May 13, 2010
532
0
0
Ishal said:
Hugga_Bear said:
That's...you seem a little angry about this, I'm not sure why. It appears to be a superlative game, agreed. I think it's a shame it's not on PC at release but I think that of any exclusive, I don't like exclusivity; it necessitates exclusion. I will get a PS4 almost solely for Bloodborne. Madness? Not really, I can't afford a gaming PC (no, I really can't) and there are other games on PS4 I'd love to dabble in. It's not just for Bloodborne but Bloodborne sways me. Of course, I'll wait a little longer to hear some trusted reviews. One must be careful not to get taken in by the shiny.
It's not anger, it's more frustration than anything. I would have liked to buy BB, eventually. But having watched it streamed for the past few days, I'm just not taken in by it.

There are several things about it that either don't click, or plain rub me the wrong way. I see several things about it that remind me of DKS II. And to see people praising them here, but criticizing them in DKS II just feels like hypocrisy. But, I'm not going to get into that here. If you want to know what I mean, we can continue on that via PM.

As to the topic of console exclusivity. I used to be primarily a console gamer. I finally was able to set aside funds to build a gaming rig. It did cost me quite a bit, (once you add in the other things like Monitor, keyboard etc) so I'm not going to tell people if they think they don't have the money to build one. Though, I will say when the consoles first came out, you could certainly build a PC that outperforms them for less.

It all comes down to preference. I just don't see a reason to own a console, and now that BB hasn't grabbed me like I thought it would, there is pretty much zero reason. Other than a Wii U, that offers a different experience, I'll stick with PC. The games are more to my interest, my tastes have shifted.

This video is an in depth analysis of the state of consoles, and why some people are opting out.

It's fine, your opinion seems genuinely considered and informed so really I don't think there's much I could say, I think our personal enjoyment factors of the game appear different but in fairness I'm pretty much in love with the Souls games and their approach.
I actually generally agree and would prefer a high end PC to a console especially now I've worked out how to plug in controllers without creepy spyware. Actually I'd want both a high end PC and a PS4 ideally but in my situation that's a ridiculously expensive idea.

Regardless, I hope I didn't come across as harsh and thank you for sharing your views.
 

camazotz

New member
Jul 23, 2009
480
0
0
Lot of PC love here. As an owner of everything (because money and sickness are bad to have together I guess) I get the best of all worlds....but honestly, when I loaded up Bloodborne and "felt" how much it was like Dark Souls I got the heebie jeebies, and not in a good way.

The review suggests that patience and determination are needed to play a Souls-style game. She's not kidding...although if you feel like that's a sleight on your gamer skills, I would suggest that one must think of BB and other Souls titles are "requiring the patience of a saint, or maybe a martyr of the highest order," because I have a lot of patience, and boy do these games test it...