Ah, but money that has BEEN money is not smoke and mirrors. As you know, the concept behind the trade of money evolved from the barter system as a representation of goods and/or service. It is, essentially, a massively-grandfathered tradition which spawned the principles of economics. That a country decided to have its own currency and that its value differs from another based upon the value and running of said government is not a farce of a grandscale measure, or else all of the international debts from country to country for god-knows-what could be erased or at least pushed back by a few zeroes. I had actually asked about this in another thread a long time ago about all the worldwide debts and was cited a bunch of reasons for why that doesn't work. If you can't manipulate the numbers so easily, they must mean something legally that refuses to change.Veylon said:Zooba
Now, compare the history of money - along with the ups and downs of economics - and where it all came from...to Bitcoins. It's come out of nowhere and nothing and represents no one, certainly not by actual laws or a government...which is kind of important. It doesn't represent anything BUT numbers, and IS the too-easy manipulation of them. If money and bitcoins were sports, money would be like baseball or football...while bitcoins would be Calvinball. If this keeps up, I'm going to declare that badass beards are as priceless as Ming Dynasty Vases, and every badass beard-bearer will agree with me. After that, I WILL RULE THE WORLD...somehow.