Books You Want Horribly Destroyed.

[pwnzerstick]

When I saw this thread, I instantly knew that Twilight would make up about 50 percent of the posts, and I wasn't far off. Also, I agree with that.

 

[pwnzerstick]

Mein Kampf

The Bible

Twilight

Wow I'm surprised that it took this long for Mein Kampf to get mentioned.

 

[hurfdurp]

Normally people get their ammo for these threads from books they were forced to read in High School, but I liked all of those books. In my spare time I don't encounter too much literature I want to burn, since I could easily put it down so there isn't enough time for hate to properly manifest. I got nothing.

 

[icame]

I'll say twilight to along with everyone else who hasn't read it and I'll add Percy jack and the Olympians: The lightning thief. The book wasn't even that bad but the movie was just so terrible is forever tainted the story.

 

[Macgyvercas]

Well, I believe that destroying books is a true sign of an intellectually stunted culture, but that's just me. However, when asked what books would I prefer didn't exist, I'm going to say Tony Blair's recent book. Reading it actually made me feel physically ill. He's one of the most callous and opportunistic politicians out there, and I honestly would be glad if someone killed him. Or at least just punched him once.

*buys plane ticket to Britain*
*punches Tony Blair*
*gets arrested*

You owe me big time, man.

OT: I wish the Twilight Saga (all of them) didn't exist. I also didn't care for a book by the name of "Izzy Willy Nilly" so I'll say that too.

 

[laserwulf]

Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health

(aka the basis for Scientology)
Everyone has a right to believe whatever they want, but using pseudo-science to create an abusive, litigious money-making scheme under the guise of a religion is ethically wrong. I have no problems with Scientologists, just the organization known as the Church of Scientology.

 

[SimuLord]

The title pretty much explains the thread, name some books that were just so bad that you want them to be eliminated.

This mostly comes as a response to the Outliers: The Story of Success, a new book gaining alot of praise. The author, Malcolm Gladwell, basically argues that factors such as what time of the year you were born can determine how successful you are in some fields. I hate this book with a passion, mostly because it acts like what I call faux academia,where an author pretends to use scientific data to back up their claims, when in reality all they're using is broad statistics that they can use to make themselves appear right. Gladwell just dumbs down a ton of sociology in order to come to his conclusions, and what drives me nuts is that people are actually going along with his ideas, despite the fact that they have no real evidence behind them. Also, this might make me sound like a university elitist, but if you claim all the shit he does in the Outliers, I expect a fifty or sixty page bibliography at the end. Most editions of the Outliers don't have any pages devoted to references.

So what books do you want thrown on the burning pile?

EDIT: Because satire is hard to convey on the internet, let me make it clear that I'm not saying we should go out and start burning books we hate. This is more a discussion on terrible books then anything else, so please, no more quoting and empty moralizing on how 'burning books is anti-intellectual and wrong, blah blah blah.'

You and I clearly had opposite reactions to Gladwell's core thesis. And if you'd read the book and understood it you'd know why Gladwell's time-of-year theory works.

You need to spend 10,000 hours reading. Maybe you'll get better at it.

 

[UntrodTripod]

1. Anything by Malcom Gladwell
2. The Awakening
3. A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius
4. the Secret Life of Bees

there's a lot more, but this is making my blood boil

 

[UntrodTripod]

You need to spend 10,000 hours reading. Maybe you'll get better at it.

Speaking as someone who actually does a skill for a living, I find the 10000 hour rule to be really enraging. There is so much wrong with that theory that there's almost no way to approach it.

 

[HT_Black]

...and as an afterthought I'd add George Orwell's 1984 and Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

The Eye of Argon is close, but gets a pass for the same reason as Rocky Horror and Ed Wood movies. The world needs literature that bad.

Why, oh why, would you want both those excellent dystopian books destroyed? Especially when you could just go back in time and get rid of WE, by Yevgeny Zamyatin in 1920, which both Orwell and Huxley openly admitted to ripping off

The former is paced like a stroke victim wrapped in chains and suspended in molasses, sports a number of uncomfortably detailed author-appeal-laden sex scenes, and has a plot that couldn't be more predictable if you had a working crystal ball; the latter was bland, depressing, bland, redundant, bland, and frankly rather dull; and both of them use two hundred or pages to do the work of a nine-year old with a piece of notebook paper and half an hour on a Saturday morning.

 

[Macgyvercas]

Well, I believe that destroying books is a true sign of an intellectually stunted culture, but that's just me. However, when asked what books would I prefer didn't exist, I'm going to say Tony Blair's recent book. Reading it actually made me feel physically ill. He's one of the most callous and opportunistic politicians out there, and I honestly would be glad if someone killed him. Or at least just punched him once.

*buys plane ticket to Britain*
*punches Tony Blair*
*gets arrested*

You owe me big time, man.

If you or anyone had the balls to actually do that I'd worship you as a fucking god.

*strokes goatee*

Well, it would be nice to be worshipped. But on the other hand, me doing that would be an international crime, which would in turn make me a criminal, which would in turn prohibit me from owning guns. And I like my guns.

Maybe if I could turn invisible...

 

[Freeze_L]

[HEADING=1]

Anti-religious bullshit incoming! Take cover!​

[/HEADING]

Anyway, now that that mandatory thingy-majigger is over, I'm going to go for the exact opposite of what I just warned about. I think that Richard Dawkins' The God Dilemma needs to get burned. Why? Because I'm allowed to believe what I want, and having a book calling me a dumbass isn't going to change my mind.
Is it really so wrong that I believe in something rather primitive? No sir, no it is not. It may be primitive, silly, all around unlikely, but you know what? It makes me happy. So I reserve the right to believe that there is an invisible man in the sky.

Edit: It's actually called The God Delusion. I apologize to any fans, readers, or devout worshipers of this piece of literature that I may have offended.

Hey i want to burn that too! but in addition to what you said i would like to add that it is actually very poorly written and the arguments are hollow, Dawkins should never have written this book, if anything it is appealing to pepole's poor understanding of theology and philosophy and manipulating them into believing arguments that are poorly conceived and easily countered are well thought out and hold water. He uses every single logical fallacy in the book and somehow manages to convince pepole that he is right, and any one who has ever thought for themselves can see the error in his logic, he is as irrational as he claims religious pepole are!

Also i have this dislike for twilight and have to agree with Stephen King that Myers cant write, if ever i had to destroy a work for heat this would be on the top of my to go list. Other smut like this could go to, and all of the bad vampire books that spawned from Twilight as well.

 

[Freeze_L]

for irony purposes Fahrenheit 451

 

[thenumberthirteen]

Hmmm. Probably one of those self-help/natural healing/spirit meditation books that have a cult following. Like the one that says all illness is caused by Liver flukes (I can't remember the name). People believe that crap and can lose their money or even their life.

I'm one for free speech and expression, but some of those bastards need to be stopped NOW.

 

[Amethyst Wind]

The Grapes of Wrath.

It's just so un-entertaining.

 

[sheic99]

Mein Kampf

58 posts. It Took 58 POSTS TO GET THIS MENTIONED

As for me, any book written by D.H. Lawrence. He is a shitty author who can't make any subject interesting. When you write a book about sex, you damn well better make sure your readers know there is sex happening.

 

[Romidude]

Any religious text. Seriously, the world would be a lot more peaceful without religion.

HA! War would exist ether way, and don't destroy books, It's monstrous

Name one war that wasn't Religiously driven or Politically driven (I.E. DEM R TEH COMMEIZ SHEWT DEM!).

 

[lacktheknack]

<link=http://www.amazon.com/How-Shit-Woods-Second-Environmentally/dp/0898156270>"How to Shit in the Woods".

Also the Kama Sutra. Whatever happened to figuring it out yourself for extra pleasure?

 

[Chappy]

I think books that need to be burned or stopped are only the books that are over hyped or used purely to try and milk as much money while adding nothing, while causing other works to lose the attention they deserve for their innovations.

Over hyped books being terrible at this making the author keep making sequels when out of idea's purely for the fan's wish and their bank instead of making a new innovation, much like games and their sequels, my opinion anyway.

And so we have the customary Twilight insult, to qoute The Austin 'To kill an idea is worse than killing a man' how many traditional idea's and images had Twilight killed to replace with teens wearing to much makeup and glitter? In essence go Dracula.

 

[pigmypython]

The Koran...