Borderlands' Mad Moxxi Explains Herself

[Irridium]

Haha! She shot him with the konami code, thats awsome.

Makes me wish my friends still played Borderlands, instead of most of them selling it to help pay for a certain Modern Warfare game...

Also, a bank!

Borderlands sure has a lot of DLC for a relatively new game

*Rips of shirt and rubs chest in your face*

IT'S THE FUTURE.

Then the future is very hairy...

Am I understanding this wrong? It seems to have no PC release date?

It will probably be like Zombie Island, where its released quite a while after the console versions.

No idea why.

 

[carpathic]

Seems like a lovely lady

 

[ProfessorLayton]

That looks pretty killer. I still have to beat zombie island, but this could be just as fun. I'm buying this the day it comes out.

 

[GloatingSwine]

Too little, too late, I'm afraid. Horde would have been really good in Blands, but it's yesterday's news now, all my co-op buddies are off doing other things, and it's too close to the gigantic monster rush of new titles early next year.

 

[Iron Mal]

Well, seeing as I play as Lilith...
...
...
...
...
...
...
I'm sorry, what was I talking about?

That raises a very good question.

What if Lilith did win? Would she be a fourth husband or a first wife? (I'm not quite sure how lesbian marriges work)

 

[Elesar]

Two men enter. One man leaves...then hits that.

 

[Ghonzor]

Looks fun. The Zombie Island of Dr. Ned was pretty damn entertaining.

Especially when you get to see
<spoiler=Made me laugh>TK Baha's leg and then him himself

I look forward to getting it.

You though that the "headshot about 500 zombies" quests were fun?

Did I think those were fun?
Oh [insert deity here] no.
Everything else was though.
I was a bit sad that Dead Haven was just a repainted Old Haven to be honest...

 

[MorsePacific]

I really don't know what to think of this new DLC. The Zombie Island of Dr. Ned was a huge failure in my eyes.

 

[Wandrecanada]

Yes it was the Konami code. Because he was a cheater!

 

[Copter400]

(I'm not quite sure how lesbian marriges work)

Well, I'd imagine. Very, very, very well.

 

[XPandaParadeX]

THAT ***** KILLED STEVE.

No more "HEYO!" from him...

Thats right, ITS GUNA BE FUN ON DA BUN!

i am really excited to be playing the mad moxi add on. i just wish it would come out sooner. TT_TT...but, i have zombie island. oh im sorry, they prefer the term "living impaired".

 

[Shru1kan]

Borderlands sure has a lot of DLC for a relatively new game

*Rips of shirt and rubs chest in your face*

IT'S THE FUTURE.

That combined with your avatar made me feel slightly ill.

I'm not too supportive of this game anymore, with all the animosity towards PC.

 

[Nunka]

If you go and google, the suggestions put contextually incorrect 'loose' before 'lose'. Such as, You said 'Lose a match' did you mean 'Loose a match'?

No. No I didn't.

If you're going to be picky, I think I'm allowed to be picky too.

"Loose a match" (as in "I let loose a match" or "he loosed a match") is not contextually incorrect. It can refer to either freeing a match (from a matchbook, presumably) or releasing a match in some unspecified direction. You should choose your examples more carefully if you're going to be picky.

Ha, a good point I suppose, however I would argue that 'Loose a match' cannot exist without a pre-defined qualifier. Such as 'I am' or 'I let'. Therefore, as a sentence fragment it is without meaning, and as nonsensical as any other collection of three words that could be qualified through grammar or words set before/after them. not to mention that no words can exist before Loose a match because the L is a capital, unless its being qualified as a name. In which case anything is valid.

And I would argue that "Loose a match"---when provided with an appropriate concluding punctuation symbol---functions quite well on its own as a command (e.g., "Loose a match! Do it now!") This cannot be said for every collection of three words.

Additionally, getting back to the initial issue, dalek sec's command of "Loose the makeup and we'll talk about it," while certainly containing an admitted typo, is not in itself contextually incorrect. It is perfectly grammatically sound and, effectively, means the same thing as "Lose the makeup and we'll talk about it." The fact that it simply sounds strange does not make it wrong.

Merry Saturday.

 

[Radelaide]

And PC players get screwed once more.

This is what I get for supporting new IPs.

Cry moar. Just because you're a PC player, doesn't mean you're automatically entitled to everything. Console players get screwed over about a lot of things and Most of us, don't whine about it. You'll be fine.

 

[Abedeus]

And PC players get screwed once more.

This is what I get for supporting new IPs.

Cry moar. Just because you're a PC player, doesn't mean you're automatically entitled to everything. Console players get screwed over about a lot of things and Most of us, don't whine about it. You'll be fine.

And like most of the "LOLOL PC PLAYER" people, you are an ignorant. Don't know what I'm talking about, don't speak.

They stealth-add DRM, ignore online problems, their response to "when is the patch and what's it going to add?" is "there is a patch, don't know when and what, sorry". Technical support is non-existant. Also we have no idea if we'll get THIS DLC AT ALL.

And then they blame the piracy.

 

[Radelaide]

And PC players get screwed once more.

This is what I get for supporting new IPs.

Cry moar. Just because you're a PC player, doesn't mean you're automatically entitled to everything. Console players get screwed over about a lot of things and Most of us, don't whine about it. You'll be fine.

And like most of the "LOLOL PC PLAYER" people, you are an ignorant. Don't know what I'm talking about, don't speak.

They stealth-add DRM, ignore online problems, their response to "when is the patch and what's it going to add?" is "there is a patch, don't know when and what, sorry". Technical support is non-existant. Also we have no idea if we'll get THIS DLC AT ALL.

And then they blame the piracy.

You automatically assume I don't play PC games either? Wow, and I'm the ignorant one. How about you go back, get your facts straight, then cry about not getting something that you're not freely entitled too, eh?

I'm going to go back and play my PC, then I might go knock a few rounds on my xbox. Byeeee!

 

[Abedeus]

And PC players get screwed once more.

This is what I get for supporting new IPs.

Cry moar. Just because you're a PC player, doesn't mean you're automatically entitled to everything. Console players get screwed over about a lot of things and Most of us, don't whine about it. You'll be fine.

And like most of the "LOLOL PC PLAYER" people, you are an ignorant. Don't know what I'm talking about, don't speak.

They stealth-add DRM, ignore online problems, their response to "when is the patch and what's it going to add?" is "there is a patch, don't know when and what, sorry". Technical support is non-existant. Also we have no idea if we'll get THIS DLC AT ALL.

And then they blame the piracy.

You automatically assume I don't play PC games either? Wow, and I'm the ignorant one. How about you go back, get your facts straight, then cry about not getting something that you're not freely entitled too, eh?

I'm going to go back and play my PC, then I might go knock a few rounds on my xbox. Byeeee!

Don't deflect. Address the matters of DRM, online problems, the patch and DLC issues.

 

[Radelaide]

Don't deflect. Address the matters of DRM, online problems, the patch and DLC issues.

DRM: As long as piracy is seen as a "threat", it's gunna continue. You'll live.
Online Problems: The game is only new. They need to work on it. You'll live.
DLC: Like I said before, PC's are automatically entitled to everything just because. You'll live.

Happy now?

 

[Abedeus]

Don't deflect. Address the matters of DRM, online problems, the patch and DLC issues.

DRM: As long as piracy is seen as a "threat", it's gunna continue. You'll live.
Online Problems: The game is only new. They need to work on it. You'll live.
DLC: Like I said before, PC's are automatically entitled to everything just because. You'll live.

Happy now?

STEALTH-adding DRM. That's like you buying a new pair of jeans, and the security takes your fingerprints. The game's description and versions 1.0 and 1.01 DON'T have SecuROM. They added the 1.1 only to add DRM. If you bought Steam version, you MUST patch the game. If you want to play online, you MUST patch the game. And you get SecuROM, so you might not be lucky enough to have no problems.

Also, I could download the DLC illegally after 3 days after release. SecuROM never, ever prevents piracy - it only prevents the legal people from buying the game. Why pay someone who thinks you are a thief in the first place?

Online problems: ...they chose GameSpy. People must run around websites to find out how to forward ports, just to play a game they bought. And since Borderlands is advertised as a 4-player Coop game, it's stupid that they haven't done anything yet.

DLC: Two platforms are getting the DLC, one isn't. You call it fair? If you bother to release the game on a platform, don't exclude the expansion packs. Especially if it's the first game from the series and a new IP you want people to support. They shot themselves in the leg thanks to those problems.

...Not to mention I had to go around the net and download some libraries before eliminating the General Protection Fault error.