-Drifter- said:
Forgive me for saying so, but isn't that the entire point of this project? Providing something for a specific audience and not homogenizing it for the sake of mass appeal?
Besides, I think people exaggerate the "less approachable" nature of older RPG's (or perhaps just underestimate the patience and/or intelligence of their peers.) I played the first two Fallout games after Fallout 3 and had no trouble getting into either. Not only that, but I enjoyed them far more.
Precisely. I was going to make the same point myself, but you arrived before me. Almost the same experience as you, too (I played FO1 & FO2 slightly before the third, after I saw the ad for FO3. I had been hearing about this franchise for a while, so I decided to give it a try. Now the first two are my favourite games ever).
On a different note, Wasteland 2 doesn't need to sell a lot of copies, because those who financed the game won't get a share of the revenue, just a copy of the game and/or other goods if they donated enough, which means that as long as they cover the expenses outside of the budget(if there are any) with sales, they have already won. It seems a very reasonable goal, and I doubt they will fail in this.
Now, the game MIGHT suck, but at this point I see no reason to be pessimistic or optimistic about it.