It comes down to the amount of extra work, developers are trying to put together an entire working world and all the customization is a low priority feature, that seemingly simple gender choice demands:Aris Khandr said:Any game that offers even the most basic of character customization options, but does not include the option to select your gender, is immediately ignored by me. That's why I have not and will not play the Gothic series.
Honestly? While i think there would be a cursory level of bitching about it, i don't think it would revolve around the fact that the character customization was awesome but didn't include girls. I think it would be about how it's 'against the bioware spirit'. How can something that Bioware did be against their spirit.Duskflamer said:Brink is the upset because, aside from forcing your character to be male, it has a very robust character customization aspect. The fact that it put so much focus into character customization, yet forced your character to be a guy, makes the issue (which is still present in other shooters mind you) more obvious.TheDarkEricDraven said:Does Halo have female charecters in ITS multiplayer? What about Section 8? I don't know why Brink is the upset. Of course, it is a little more jaring since there isn't power armor for everyone. Despite Spartans in Multiplayer looking male, it doesn't take much to imigine one as a girl.
Imagine if Bioware came out with a new RPG with their standard level of customization, but decided that your character had to be a girl, how do you think people would react? It's the same issue here.
Probably something along the lines of...NathLines said:Thank you. Now I'm imagining a woman cooking and cleaning while epic, orchestral music plays in the background. Game of the year.iLikeHippos said:Until you notice that the goal of the RPG is to be the best cook and cleaner in the world.NathLines said:I'm waiting for the day a really, really good RPG comes out in which you can only play as a female. Then I will sit back and whatch the crowds rage.
Yes, because the audience can tolerate them more.stoprequesting said:Seriously, Gina Carano. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_CaranoTrolldor said:I never said that "it only matters". I'm saying that muscular women are off-putting in a way that muscular men are not. This is true for most people.stoprequesting said:So, why do you think the attractiveness of heavy-esque characters only matters when they are female?
Re: Gina Carano, I'm to lazy right now to find and post images. Good real-world example of a person who fits conventional beauty standards and is really tough, and has actually played a character in a video game. The only person who, to my knowledge, has won awards for being attractive *and* for punching people in the face. So, if publishers are 100% dead-set on not having female characters who don't fit conventional beauty standards, (which they unfortunately might be) they still have no excuse for making them look physically weak when that makes no sense in the context of the character haha.
Muscular men have been touted around for several millenia. Muscular women? Not so much.
Muscular. Not "off-putting."
But more to the point, there's a picture of the skeleton Heavy Weapons Guy would have to have floating around somewhere. It's pretty off-putting haha. And if you met someone with a Brick-type physique IRL, you would probably find him pretty off-putting too. Fact of the matter is, for whatever reason, male characters are generally allowed to be uglier than female characters.
Oh wow, I would hate to meet someone like you in real life - or they would hate to meet me - that comment just really riled me up :/Trolldor said:I never said that "it only matters". I'm saying that muscular women are off-putting in a way that muscular men are not. This is true for most people.
Muscular men have been touted around for several millenia. Muscular women? Not so much.
No, the multiplayer did as well. Don't know why. I could hardly notice the change of gender.Jadak said:The last one did have females, didn't it? Or was that just the campaign?TheDarkEricDraven said:Did Halo have female charecters in IT'S multiplayer? What about Section 8? I don't know why Brink is the upset. Of course, it is a little more jaring since there isn't power armor for everyone. Despite Spartans in Multiplayer looking male, it doesn't take much to imigine one as a girl.
Hm. While I question if "everyone" would do it (Timmy/Johnny/Spike player demographics, eh wot), I find this to be a valid point.starfox444 said:It's done for balanced hitboxes. Otherwise everyone would play female characters that are harder to shoot since women are generally shorter than men and also have different body shapes. These physical differences would be exaggerated in a stylised shooter.Vivace-Vivian said:Discuss your thoughts on the topic.
I thought the whole reason games were made was so I could have a game to play XDbahumat42 said:its just a featureVrud said:. . . So, why is it so important to have a highly customized male, again?
like bum shots in bulletstorm, or charge kills in gears of war, something nifty to sell the game on. You know the whole reason games are made![]()
Huh?? Women do parkour.Kukakkau said:Considering all the characters are pretty burly and have to be for the parkour, I don't want to see female characters in it.
see now that was my thought too, but if they implemented that exactly as you picture it, maybe thats being a little racist? and i doubt they would want lots of hate towards the game for that reason.Sovreign said:I can just imagine the stereotypical russian female olympian type. would give me the lolsCardinalPiggles said:imagine a female heavy :S that doesnt really fit.
exactly my point i was trying to make, i didnt know they came right out and said that though.SL33TBL1ND said:They said very early on that they would rather have very deep customisation options in one gender, than relatively shallow options for both.
They said that as soon as they said there would be character customisation. There's probably an old news post on here somewhere. Either that or it was on GiantBomb.CardinalPiggles said:exactly my point i was trying to make, i didnt know they came right out and said that though.SL33TBL1ND said:They said very early on that they would rather have very deep customisation options in one gender, than relatively shallow options for both.