Little Woodsman said:
Straw man. I don't wish to be rude, but everything you argued against is nothing that I said. I don't care that you need to know something about the source material to have it be good writing. That's true as far as I'm considered. I care that there was an implantation of superiority over something arbitrary. Was there? It looked like it to me, and even then I was giving the guy the benefit of the doubt by essentially saying if "I'm wrong just say that's not what you meant."
Kavonde said:
Go back and re-read what I posted please.
I was saying that what you assumed Kavonde & I were saying was incorrect, and reiterated what I intended to express.
In any case, I'm done. My previous exchange with you in a pony thread had led me to belive that you were someone we
could have productive discourse with. I have now come to believe that this is not the case.
"I have only one thing to say to you." (A reference from Dr. Who, not MLP BTW)
Love & tolerance.