Relish in Chaos said:
And since you're transgender yourself, I will value your analysis greatly.
And I only "missed" the connection to Nielsen because I imagine that there'd be loads of muscular women with buzz-cuts in the world that may or may not look like Nielsen, and I don't know or haven't seen much of Nielsen other than in
Rocky IV and
Red Sonja. But if so, would Frank Miller (the writer and artist of
The Dark Knight Returns and
All-Star Batman and Robin) be implying anything by this?
I mean, the character looks to be some kind of Neo-Nazi (ironic, since the old Nazis would be entirely against someone like her). Also, even her henchmen in
TDKR call her by the male name "Bruno", whereas a trans woman would be against that.
I don't know why I'm analyzing so much over a relatively minor character only featured in two
Batman comic books anyway; I'm just bored and like to overthink stuff.
Well, we do know how to spot our own better than most, since we kinda have to learn how to hide unwanted secondary characteristics. I could explain a couple things for you though.
If that is indeed a transwoman, she may be one of the oddballs that likes to be in that ambiguous zone between genders where they can keep people guessing. Great tactic to baffle people, and make sure they don't know what to expect from you. The whole neo-nazi thing on the other hand? Baffles the fuck outta me.
On another note: I think the main reason why the Nielsen comparison is drawn is because Nielsen is a well-known example of the "Strong Muscular Woman With Buzzcut" archetype. Just easier to say "Bruno looks kinda like Nielsen" than "Bruno looks like the strong muscular woman with buzzcut archetype" to get the idea across quicker, because if they've seen Rocky IV, they'll have a good idea of what she looks like.
Also: overthinking is our greatest tool. Don't ever think of putting it down! I say this because I think it's great to look deep into stuff, even if it's just a character featured in two batman comics. It offers an interesting look into the minds of the creators, and what their imaginations bring to life and why. Without overthinking like that, art loses meaning because a deep, moving painting just becomes smears of pigment spread across a piece of paper, Books become scribbles on a set of pages, Television becomes just a bunch of flashing lights on the screen, and games become just that, but controllable instead of passive. So by analyzing this character, you've justified the graphic novel as art. So good job with that random overthinking. You deserve a cookie
Edit: Captcha asks "Hows it going?" Could be better, could be worse, Cap.