pdgeorge said:
Australian forces are some of the (if not the) best trained troops in the world.
We don't tend to have the most up to date equipment most of the time. Tends to be a few years old.
Well, if by a few years, you mean decades. The standard assault rifle for the Australian military is the Austeyr, which was designed in the 70s. This replaced the M16/variants still being used as the standard issue rifle by many places today, including by first world nations like the US and Canada (USMC is going to upgrade to the G36, though the US army isn't, to make logistics that much more fun). The SA80 family is about as old as the Steyr AUG, though the UK military is using the redesigned L85A2 model.
Likewise, the Australian MBT is the decades old Abrams...which happens to be the MBT used by the US army and marines.
Everyone uses old equipment, because nobody can afford to replace everything every few years (also, the L85A1, for example, had to be redesigned due to flaws that weren't immediately apparent), but they don't really have to, because nobody else is.
pdgeorge said:
(Aussie forces tend to be called diggers for a reason)
Historical reasons, I don't imagine their fortifications training is much better than everyone else's.
ELD3RGoD said:
British SAS? Royal Commandos? RAF? Maybe not the territotial army... but still, British Military are the tippy top of the military mountain.
Ah, but then the Australian military has been heavily influenced by the British model, and they conduct alot of joint training exercises. [small]And hopefully this doesn't end up as several pages of people claiming their nation to have the best trained troops without anything to back their claims up[/small]