I like that. The paying customer gets his game with no bullshit, and the thief gets to pay a fine that is hopefully a lot more than the price of the game if the get caught. I just hope they catch a lot of them and follow up on these threats.
No it shouldn't be the cost of the game, but it shouldn't be something insane that no one can pay either. It should be something like three times the cost of the game. If it's just the cost of the game there is really no deterrent for them not to try again, but if they have to pay more, maybe next time they will think "Maybe I should just buy this game for the regular price and not risk paying three times as much if they catch me."SinisterGehe said:No the fine must be, game price+ tax+ 10% of total income that the game has made this far+ 50,000 of your local money and all this times two.feather240 said:It would be funny if the fine costs the exact price of the game, plus tax.
/Sarcasm
Yeah, but I agree. If you get fined for piracy it should be game price+ your local ticket fee.
So... In Finland If I would be caught by this system (assuming Fine is game price + local ticket fee), I would get fine ~50euros + 32euros = 82 euros, which sounds decent compared to twentythousandmillionhundredtwentysictymilliontwo euros.