Never ever ever trust trailers. Either good or bad. Trailers are put together by other people, to try and hype the movie, they will splice things together way out of sync, because in a 3 minute format, that's got the most impact and punch. Just go see the movie and judge it based on how it was actually put together.Zontar said:So Chappie was a movie that caught my attention with its initial trailers. They seemed to be of a robot with a childish mind that was in a world not too dissimilar to our own, with the story revolving around an A.I. learning what it means to be alive and the antagonists being people who feared what he was, and what he represented. It seemed like an interesting science fiction movie that actually gave logical, understandable and even relatable motivations with the fear of the unknown.
Then the more recent trailers have started to show up where the villains are working for the government, and that Chappie was created to fight the big evil government, and I just feel as though they took a more interesting movie and turned it into a generic one right before my eyes. I know have no interest in the movie and have no intent in watching it.
Am I the only one who feels this way? I really wanted to see the movie of the first few trailers I saw, not the boring looking generic movie that's being advertised now.
This I will definitely give Blonkamp credit for. His movies are some of the few Sci-fi films I've seen in which futuristic weaponry actually feels visceral and brutal, like they've taken the already brutal power of firearms and amped them up to an almost sadistic degree, which is what you'd expect of futuristic weapons.Callate said:From what I've seen, Blomkamp's strength isn't plot. It's the ability to make fantastic science fiction technology seem plausible, and even mundane, in the hands of the occupants of his world.
Hence why I'm quite worried how he's going to handle the next Alien movie.Jack T. Pumpkin said:Isn't that guy the commie lunatic who also made Elysium, aka "everything rich people have should be public property because fuck rich people who aren't me"?MarsAtlas said:My guess is that the whole "AI turning against its government masters" thing is going to be some sort of anti-militarism message being thrown into the mix.
Its being made by the guy who also did District 9, so if you've seen that, you can probably guess - tons of various political messages alongside a movie with sudden but competent genre shifts.Eclipse Dragon said:It left me wondering what kind of movie this will actually be.
I'll agree with that. While I found District 9 a "meh, worth Netflixing" movie, I will say that he made the alien weaponry holy-shit-snacky powerful. My girlfriend actually disliked the movie because of how brutal the violence was. I said "that's the point; violence is brutal and ugly and I think the director wants that to be seen."Ihateregistering1 said:This I will definitely give Blonkamp credit for. His movies are some of the few Sci-fi films I've seen in which futuristic weaponry actually feels visceral and brutal, like they've taken the already brutal power of firearms and amped them up to an almost sadistic degree, which is what you'd expect of futuristic weapons.
If they EVER manage to get the greenlight for the "Altered Carbon" movie, he'd be an awesome director for it.