Not how it works. The foreskin is one of a few places on the body that contains a high concentration of meissner's corpuscles. They are responsible for fine touch sensation. They're highly specialized mechanoceptors and are the reason your sense of touch is so great in the hands (as opposed to say, the elbows). You lose the foreskin, they're gone. They don't go elsewhere.Nigh Invulnerable said:If you're circumcised as a baby those neurons would never have been assigned to "willy pleasure reception" in the first place so they can be used elsewhere, like the head of the penis. Seriously, I would not want more sensitivity in my penis during sex, it's awesome as is.
Okay, that made me laugh.Hero in a half shell said:"So what did you do this Christmas?"
"Oh you know, the usual, had turkey for dinner, watched movies with the family around an open fire, then I logged into an internet forum to discuss the cosmetic value of minor surgery in altering male genitalia."
On topic, I'm European, and I wouldn't bother with it on my children, and I've never heard of anyone getting circumsised (or anywhere that does that) Over here that really isn't a tradition at all. It would pretty much be like suggesting you cut off your middle toe.
Yes we really need to stop having these threads, and its been far more than 4 in two years. Just by searching the forums I found closer to a dozen for 2011 alone. It's getting old.Thomas Guy said:No it isn't. Also, can we ban circumcision threads? This has to be the 4th one in two years.
Yea parent's personal choice works for me. I trust my parents; it's their job to do what they think is best. As for "feel less", can't really make an accurate claim since haven't experienced both sidesDanyal said:I have read that circumcised people tend to 'feel less'. Also, personal choice? Your personal choice to circumcise your children or your children's choice to let themselves be circumcised when they're very young?rt052192 said:hey im circumcised and no complaints here. for me it should be a personal choice
How would they know better?j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:You know, I lived with a couple of Jewish guys for a while, and they said that circumcision never bothered them, never affected their 'sensitivity' during sex
It's called a goddamn shower.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:and they were quite glad they never had to deal with smegma/knob cheese/whatever you like to call it.
After a week without a shower, your armpit will certainly stink. Let's cut off your arm to prevent that.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Anyone who, for whatever reason, has had to make do without a shower for a week will testify that an unwashed, uncircumcised penis is about the most revolting thing in the world.
Fear that their sons will choose not to be like them.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:And there's a very good reason parents prefer to have their children snipped at childhood rather than choosing it when they're adults.
Why, yes, it means they were ignorant! And that's the optimist alternative. Because, if you think circumcision has no negative side effects, you ARE ignorant. But if you learn of its harm, and still think it is acceptable to subject your child to it... what would that tell about them?Soviet Heavy said:I'm circumcised. Does that mean that my parents were ignorant?