So much this. And you know what else I'd like to add to the "absolutely not cool, despite nerds saying otherwise"? Trench coats. Fuck trench coats. They were cool for about 6 months after the first Matrix movie came out, and subsequently they've been run into the ground so hard they're now technically considered part of Chinese territorial soil. No, you don't look cool and mysterious; you look like a fat dork. Literally any other kind of coat is cooler than a trench coat.Woodsey said:It's time to talk about fedoras. You all look terrible in them. No exceptions. People seem to think they're some kind of magic coolness device. They're not, they're just something that, for some reason, has been picked up by people on gaming forums - undoubtedly a great place for fashion advice - and labelled as 'cool'.
When it comes to rationality, I would suggest that until the end of elementary/primary school, peoples' heads should be shaved to reduce the spread of parasites prevalent in their age group, but afterwards, the hair be left to grow.valium said:Then we should all shave our heads and wear the most bland gray robes we can find, because otherwise would be irrational.SVilleca said:Hi Valium,valium said:Caring about your appearance is not a sin, nor is it inherently vain.SVilleca said:Vanity is not a positive attribute to have. It does not accomplish anything of merit, so spending an inordinate amount of time or money on it does not really make sense.valium said:Nothing more irrational than what you just posted. A lot of people like the look of suits; that is an esthetic thing, not a societal thing.SVilleca said:Hi Candidus, among others,Candidus said:Suits. Specifically business clothes. I don't own any, and I'll never wear them to an interview or anything. Just no chance.
You might be the best person in the world at your job. Or the worst. Sharp clothes do nothing to convince me either way. They don't inspire my confidence, that's for sure. Are you hiding something? Did your mother dress you? Who knows. I'm not crediting you a damned thing.
No amount of expert ironing of unpleasant clothes will erase the possibility from my mind that you're an inept sod who doesn't know shit about shit. So why not wear whatever makes you comfortable instead?
Doesn't matter I suppose. As long as I don't have to tag along. But with the above in mind, what's the point of them...
The use of suits to convey professionalism and ability is a Rational Astrology, and their value comes only because society believes that perception to be true and accurate. There is nothing about wearing a suit that intrinsically indicates someone's superiority or skills relative to any other piece of clothing, and considering the relative costs of clothing, it is irrational to wear them except to appease those who are irrational.
I do not personally wear suits, except to the extent forced upon me by my family at my Grandfather's funeral. I wore a shirt and dress slacks to my job interview and was still hired, though I may have been luckier than most. I would suggest to people here that if you have no driving need to appease an irrational society, you should probably avoid doing so, because you are just helping perpetuate lines of thought that do not make sense.
http://www.interfluidity.com/v2/3513.html
SVilleca
I do hope that you find happiness and will be your friend always.
SVilleca
With all love and respect.
valium
I disagree with your assessment of the term vanity, but I will agree that it is not a sin in wanting to look pretty. I do not believe in any sins, it is just irrational because of the time wasted on such things.
That same time dedicated to your own education would be more valuable and would add up to quite a bit of saved hours, over the years. If you would like to start today, I will recommend to you the book Cable Cowboy: John Malone and the Rise of the Modern Cable Business.
It is available on Kindle through the Amazon store, and you will learn quite a bit from it not only regarding the cable industry, but capital allocation and financial engineering as well. It is my second favorite book that I have read this year, but I suspect my #1 favorite book targets too small of an audience to be of interest to most people.
Thank you for your kind wishes, and the same goes for you as well.
SVilleca
With warmest regards and the most exuberant well wishes.
valium
Seconded.HoneyVision said:I'm actually kinda curious now to know what people in this thread actually dress like.
Totally agree, up until here. Sure trench coats look awful if they are worn by your "fat dork", but when worn by a Wermacht officer...?Starik20X6 said:So much this. And you know what else I'd like to add to the "absolutely not cool, despite nerds saying otherwise"? Trench coats. Fuck trench coats. They were cool for about 6 months after the first Matrix movie came out, and subsequently they've been run into the ground so hard they're now technically considered part of Chinese territorial soil. No, you don't look cool and mysterious; you look like a fat dork. Literally any other kind of coat is cooler than a trench coat.Woodsey said:It's time to talk about fedoras. You all look terrible in them. No exceptions. People seem to think they're some kind of magic coolness device. They're not, they're just something that, for some reason, has been picked up by people on gaming forums - undoubtedly a great place for fashion advice - and labelled as 'cool'.
Me neither. I used to wear them all the time, but at the time nobody I knew of would even think of wearing them outside.Dirty Hipsters said:Clothing items I don't understand - Uggs.
Here's the exception:Wadders said:Totally agree, up until here. Sure trench coats look awful if they are worn by your "fat dork", but when worn by a Wermacht officer...?![]()
![]()
Also they don't have to be leather - these count as trench coats too, I believe, and are also nice.
![]()
Agh fuck! You winyaz1410 said:Here's the exception:Wadders said:Totally agree, up until here. Sure trench coats look awful if they are worn by your "fat dork", but when worn by a Wermacht officer...?![]()
![]()
Also they don't have to be leather - these count as trench coats too, I believe, and are also nice.
![]()
![]()
Heels... Yeah, I think a lot of people have mixed feelings about heels...Wadders said:And heels seem to be a subject of hate. I'n not female so it's not my place to comment but I just thought heels were accepted as a thing women wore when wanting to look smart/sexy. Had no idea there were people who are so vehemently anti-heel.
Well, fair enough, good points all. I realised they were uncomfortable - my female friends often walk into town wearing flats for instance, and then change into their heels. But as you said, I've never worn them so I have no idea quite how uncomfortable they are. Which is very uncomfortable, by the sounds of it.CrystalShadow said:Heels... Yeah, I think a lot of people have mixed feelings about heels...Wadders said:And heels seem to be a subject of hate. I'n not female so it's not my place to comment but I just thought heels were accepted as a thing women wore when wanting to look smart/sexy. Had no idea there were people who are so vehemently anti-heel.
Well, anyone that's actually ever worn anything with heels probably has mixed feelings about them. If you've never worn them you might not get it, but if you have it'll be pretty obvious what the problem is.
Firstly, the good points about them is they do improve your appearance, usually. (if you're careful, anyway). And they can make you seem taller.
Whether that's a good thing or not depends on how tall you are already, because for women in particular, there seems to be some kind of optimum height. Being either shorter or taller than this usually ends up being held against you, if only very subtly.
But the negatives are pretty serious. - Heels, especially very high ones are an absolute pain to walk in. It takes a fairly large amount of practice to be able to walk more than a few meters in heels,
And... You can pretty much forget about being able to run while wearing them.
Add to that the fact that most heels will hurt your toes pretty badly, no matter how well the shoes are made (because of physics, basically), and that long-term use of heels can damage your feet and ankles...
And, basically, it should be more obvious why there's so much dislike for them.
Basically, heels are only for people and/or situations where what you look like is vastly more important than the fairly basic ability to be able to walk and run.
Because you pretty much can't do one of those at all, and it cripples your ability to do the other to some extent as well.
Heels are the very definition of form over functionality.
http://www.goniovisionbox.org/2013/01/jumpsuits-or-rompers-for-women-style/Hafrael said:Maybe her jumper just didn't fit her.dmase said:My ex-girlfriend had this one piece short-suit thing. It was like called a romper or some shit and all I could think about was that sounds like something a baby would wear why is grown woman wearing something like that. It makes you look your pregnant even though your skinny, it has a similar type of pattern as several couches I've seen, you have to be completely naked in order to take a piss, and there is nothing fashionable about them.
My girlfriend is smoking in her's.
Hmm. I don't know what to make of an attitude like this. On the one hand, there are some people around that you'd wish you didn't have to see. (but a lot of the time this cannot be reasonably improved by anything they can actually do in terms of clothing/grooming, so it becomes a bit of a moot point.).Starik20X6 said:You know what? I just don't understand anyone who doesn't take pride in their appearance. If you aren't dressed like you're going on a date, don't leave the house yet because you aren't dressed properly. Dress like each day is the day you'll be interviewed for your dream job, by your future wife/husband. If everyone did that, the world would be a much nicer looking place.
Oh, a good pair can be fine...Wadders said:Well, fair enough, good points all. I realised they were uncomfortable - my female friends often walk into town wearing flats for instance, and then change into their heels. But as you said, I've never worn them so I have no idea quite how uncomfortable they are. Which is very uncomfortable, by the sounds of it.CrystalShadow said:[spoiler = "Click for more..."]Wadders said:And heels seem to be a subject of hate. I'n not female so it's not my place to comment but I just thought heels were accepted as a thing women wore when wanting to look smart/sexy. Had no idea there were people who are so vehemently anti-heel.
Heels... Yeah, I think a lot of people have mixed feelings about heels...
Well, anyone that's actually ever worn anything with heels probably has mixed feelings about them. If you've never worn them you might not get it, but if you have it'll be pretty obvious what the problem is.
Firstly, the good points about them is they do improve your appearance, usually. (if you're careful, anyway). And they can make you seem taller.
Whether that's a good thing or not depends on how tall you are already, because for women in particular, there seems to be some kind of optimum height. Being either shorter or taller than this usually ends up being held against you, if only very subtly.
But the negatives are pretty serious. - Heels, especially very high ones are an absolute pain to walk in. It takes a fairly large amount of practice to be able to walk more than a few meters in heels,
And... You can pretty much forget about being able to run while wearing them.
Add to that the fact that most heels will hurt your toes pretty badly, no matter how well the shoes are made (because of physics, basically), and that long-term use of heels can damage your feet and ankles...
And, basically, it should be more obvious why there's so much dislike for them.
Basically, heels are only for people and/or situations where what you look like is vastly more important than the fairly basic ability to be able to walk and run.
Because you pretty much can't do one of those at all, and it cripples your ability to do the other to some extent as well.
Heels are the very definition of form over functionality.[/spoiler]
I know two people already addressed this, but lol. If I'm not wearing a bra, just walking down stairs is enough to make my boobs incredibly uncomfortable, never mind running or any other active movements. I can't believe people don't realize that they're worn for support.theSteamSupported said:I have a trouble understanding bras. All you're doing is making dudes think that boobs defy gravity. I understand if your titties are so big, that they're too heavy to hold up on your own without a bra, but maybe then you should consider working out your shoulder muscles or having those milkies reduced.
Same thing goes for "natural looking" make-up. If you're unhappy with how your face looks, perhaps you may consider getting those facial butters and whatnot to improve its skin.
Basically, anything that gives others a false image in their heads about how your naked body looks like. You liars.
I've heard they act as fart silencers. So enjoy that image...Nathan Crumpler said:I don't understand thongs. I get it when someone is wearing a bikini or a short skirt, but what about when some one is wearing jeans? If you want to look like you aren't wearing underwear, don't wear underwear.
Gonna have to agree with the man there, ties really do add some colour to an otherwise bland shirt (unfortunately I have yet to find a blazer/suit jacket that can counteract the power of boring shirts). If it feels like a choker then either you're wearing it tighter than necessary, the collar of your shirt is too tight or your workplace has ridiculous rules regarding how one must wear their ties and how one must maintain their apparel.valium said:Plenty of ways to add color to a suit that is more comfortable than a male choker collar.Seth Carter said:Ties generally add some colour diversity to a suit ensemble. Which tends to be one solid colour and often dark. (Seriously, trying to find decently patterned or not grey/brown/black/navy suits is pretty tough). That said, I don't find them particularly well suited to wearing with just a shirt sans coat/blazer, and the tie over t-shirt thing is just silly.
It's a derogatory name for the shirt. When I wear it, it's an undershirt. When that redneck asshole wears it it's a wifebeater.Aris Khandr said:I'm aware of how they got the name, but why in the world would you keep calling them that? What is wrong with "tank top"? I just can't imagine why you'd want to refer to your clothing that way. If a group of women became infamous for choking their children while wearing a certain style of jacket, I wouldn't refer to my own jacket as a "baby strangler". It just seems completely odd to me that guys are like "yes, this seems like a perfectly valid name for a thing".
I completely disagree. (In fact those were exactly what I was talking about)dmase said:http://www.goniovisionbox.org/2013/01/jumpsuits-or-rompers-for-women-style/Hafrael said:Maybe her jumper just didn't fit her.dmase said:My ex-girlfriend had this one piece short-suit thing. It was like called a romper or some shit and all I could think about was that sounds like something a baby would wear why is grown woman wearing something like that. It makes you look your pregnant even though your skinny, it has a similar type of pattern as several couches I've seen, you have to be completely naked in order to take a piss, and there is nothing fashionable about them.
My girlfriend is smoking in her's.
I looked up a jumper and I guess that is a sweater. I'm talking about a romper, those one piece tings in the above link. All of those women are attractive and yet not sexy because of those things.