Comixology Dropped Saga #12, Not Apple

[Lightknight]

The issue you keep referencing was not the issue that was pulled. The sextillion scene was in issue four.

Whoa... I saw the picture and thought that's what they were talking about... like it was just a typical trade formatting that removes the original issue distinction. Blocking issue 4 would have actually been understandable.

So, you mean to tell me that they allowed that issue to get through and blocked something afterwards? Hah! I can't imagine that anything could ever be close to that issue as far as graphically. It'd have to be around the same level at most.

Was there something else in issue 15? Was there anything that was particularly more graphic than the things I listed? If not, then that list should be percieved as extreme evidence that they ARE being inconsistent.

Was the same company in charge of this for issue 4 as they are now? Did they get in trouble for that issue? I mean, damn. I've edited my previous posts so as not to mislead people who haven't read the series into thinking this block was legitimate regarding an extremely explicit issue and just one that had a trivial amount by comparison.

 

[weirdee]

I don't think anybody got in trouble for anything up until this point, so it is somewhat questionable as to how this happened in the first place.

 

[JarinArenos]

So, you mean to tell me that they allowed that issue to get through and blocked something afterwards? Hah! I can't imagine that anything could ever be close to that issue as far as graphically. It'd have to be around the same level at most.

I have not yet read issue 12 (I've read the other 11, now), but I saw the images in question and they're nowhere close to issue 4's graphicness. Just a dick and a male face from two different angles. The sole unique element seems to be the depiction of male homosexuality.

 

[Lightknight]

So, you mean to tell me that they allowed that issue to get through and blocked something afterwards? Hah! I can't imagine that anything could ever be close to that issue as far as graphically. It'd have to be around the same level at most.

I have not yet read issue 12 (I've read the other 11, now), but I saw the images in question and they're nowhere close to issue 4's graphicness. Just a dick and a male face from two different angles. The sole unique element seems to be the depiction of male homosexuality.

Yeah. I mean, once you see issue 4 there really isn't anywhere you can go from there. I simply can't believe that issue 4 wouldn't be blocked and issue 12, regardless of what's in it, could be.

Thanks for figuring out what I was misunderstanding there. Even without documentation it seems pretty blatant. But if I were to be honest I'd say they did this on purpose to get media attention and to take some sales away from Apple. I mean, holy heck did they get attention.