Tom_green_day said:
Personally, I don't give a shit about graphics. The graphics from the recent Black Ops 2, or Battlefield 3, mean as much to me as the graphics to games such as Pirates of the Caribbean, Rome Total War or M&B Warband.
In fact, I'd go so far as to say that 'good' graphics sometimes take me out of a game. In Crysis 2 and the aforementioned BF3, I found in geniunely painful in places, and hard to see things throughout. It actually gets annoying and makes me want to play games without the stupid lighting effects amongst other things.
That's not a problem of good graphics, that's a problem of bad design. Look at TF2: you probably wouldn't notice it until you play it for a while, but TF2 actually has really good graphics. It's just that TF2 doesn't sacrifice good visual design for the sake of "realism". If BF3 or 2 or any of the recent COD games had just cut back on the
fucking visual clutter, the gameplay would be a lot more bareable. As it is, though, too much shit on screen makes the game boil down to who can spot the brown and grey smear behind all the brown and gray and in front of all the brown and grey before the enemy does, and it's just not fun when you're being beaten more by the scenery than you are your own lack of skill.