I don't mind if people find the trophy name tasteless. At least those people do for the correct reasons. What I mind is people incorrectly believing that the trophy achievement had anything to do with Kratos beating up Alecto. This tells me that they didn't bother to check the facts for themselves nor did they care to. They just went off what someone else said (Sessler). I can't take them or their outrage seriously if like Sessler they can't even bother to get their facts right. That's just irresponsible. Bros before Hos is obviously a play on words for Orkos betraying the Furies to help Kratos and nothing more.Windknight said:Some have noticed, and still find its context and placement tasteless and unfunny, and with some unfortunate implications.cursedseishi said:jcfrommars9 said:No, you're not. In fact, when you do beat the Furies, the achievement you gets is "Bond Broken". "Bros before Hos" is a trophy given because Orkos betrays the Furies to help Kratos defeat them. Sessler got his facts wrong and then it snowballed to the point where Santa Monica decided to change the title.Kalezian said:so, IN FUCKING CONTEXT you are beating women down and getting an achievement for it.
I'd say don't even bother. The point has been brought up multiple times in the thread, but fact of the matter is people are completely willing to disregard or outright throw away common sense and logical thinking in order to just push and push their own thoughts.
Some people noticed when you actually got the achievement, the context of the achievement, and thus understood its meaning.
Others don't give a Harpy's flea-covered ass about the context of the achievement, and just want to jump on the PC bandwagon to insult and belittle others for not agreeing with them.
Its very much a 'seriously, dude? not funny, way to ruin the moment.' kind of thing.
Some have mentioned the Ho slang word as 'just referring to women in general', and defending it like that... except, by 'referring to women in general', you are saying its ok to use a slang word that is designed as a shortened insult against sex workers as way to talk about women. Much as the way some teen boys don't seem to get why women get upset when you think its ok to just use '*****' instead of she, her or woman.
Actually, Sesslers reveiw is specifically talking about the fight, and he states that in context the fight itself and the cutscenes fit within the games framework and what we klnow of Kratos, and its only whn the trophy popped 'after the cutscene' that he took offense. And yes, that is what it is referring it too, but it essentially reduces a man choosing to aid someone against their evil mother to frat boy humour, which coupled to the prior beating of said mother sets the wrong tone.jcfrommars9 said:I don't mind if people find the trophy name tasteless. At least those people do for the correct reasons. What I mind is people incorrectly believing that the trophy achievement had anything to do with Kratos beating up Alecto. This tells me that they didn't bother to check the facts for themselves nor did they care to. They just went off what someone else said (Sessler). I can't take them or their outrage seriously if like Sessler they can't even bother to get their facts right. That's just irresponsible. Bros before Hos is obviously a play on words for Orkos betraying the Furies to help Kratos and nothing more.
And perhaps they actually saw the error of their ways. Let us continue to speculate on their motives to prove a point.rbstewart7263 said:perhaps its still them being spineless by choice over nothing.
Which is perhaps why the issue isn't him killing her (which is staying in the game) and more in the achievement name (which has been changed)debigcheez said:God of War isn't misogynistic, Kratos kills both men and women without mercy.
If anything it is the definition of gender equality.
How exactly is a quick opinion drop on a semi-related forum a "bigger-stink" than anything that would cause a dev to change their content? It's not... is the obvious answer. I do get that-that doesn't help you to be rudely dismissive of people or aid you in feeling superior...Zachary Amaranth said:When you're making a bigger stink than the people who caused the change, the "grow up" argument loses a lot of its bite.Shadowstar38 said:Some people need to grow up.
It was a stupid title. It's a stupid change. There', equality. Let's move on.
The reason I don't agree because it's clear that the impression far too many people got was that the trophy immediately followed and/or was only in regards to Kratos beating up Alecto. To the point that it needed to be explained in the first place. That tells me that ultimately, Sessler spoke without proper context. Perhaps because of the embargo but that is irresponsible. Plus Sessler's criticism implies that Kratos' reasons for beating up Alecto was because she was a woman not because she was evil and just as brutal and powerful as he is. As Kratos and players quickly find out, she cannot be defeated so easily.Windknight said:Actually, Sesslers reveiw is specifically talking about the fight, and he states that in context the fight itself and the cutscenes fit within the games framework and what we klnow of Kratos, and its only whn the trophy popped 'after the cutscene' that he took offense. And yes, that is what it is referring it too, but it essentially reduces a man choosing to aid someone against their evil mother to frat boy humour, which coupled to the prior beating of said mother sets the wrong tone.
True, but I never said otherwise.Also, there's a lot of people running in and raging 'BUT ITS OK TO BEAT UP MEN! DOUBLE STANDARDS! DOUBLE STANDARDS!', so its not just people complaining about the trophy who are not making sure they know what their talking about.
It's just a general fratboy term that doesn't harm a soul. I don't see why people get so up in arms about shit like this when they could be focusing on real misogyny.[/quote]debigcheez said:Which is perhaps why the issue isn't him killing her (which is staying in the game) and more in the achievement name (which has been changed)
Yeah, I was wondering why people would consider this to be so out-of-place. Did they forget that fountain scene near the beginning of God of War II? This is even more stupid than if Splinter Cell: Blacklist had a trophy or achievement that made a pun about knocking people unconscious. Like... where were you during everything, reviewer!?Brad Shepard said:People need to learn to take a damn joke.
His criticism was entirely of the trophy title. If you watch the video, he was uncomfortable with the beating itself, but acknowledged it fit the game and the character. Kratos is vicious, nasty, brutish, the 'victim' is evil and monstrous and just as capable of nastiness herself. The trophy title adds an uncomfortable context to the beating there otherwise would not have been.jcfrommars9 said:That tells me that ultimately, Sessler spoke without proper context. Perhaps because of the embargo but that is irresponsible. Plus Sessler's criticism implies that Kratos' reasons for beating up Alecto was because she was a woman not because she was evil and just as brutal and powerful as he is. As Kratos and players quickly find out, she cannot be defeated so easily.
True, but I never said otherwise.
The trophy title had nothing to do with the context of the beating nor could it have by any stretch of the imagination be confused as otherwise. Sessler made that incorrect leap all on his own. Worse, he did it without giving all of the context and facts which sent others in a frenzy believing that the title directly followed or was about Kratos beating a woman to death when it was neither. The phrase "Bros before Hos" has more than one meaning. Some deliberately derogatory, some a figure speech, certainly not always meaning that women in general are objects only to be used for sex. In this case, it was regarding Orkos betrayal of the Furies to Kratos. I'm not concerned about the alteration. If you're happy with it, that's fine. I'm concerned because of how badly Sessler misinterpreted the scene. How it was acceptable that Sessler didn't need to regard context or facts, just as long as he implied that it was sexist or misogynistic, then it's alright which it again, it wasn't.Windknight said:His criticism was entirely of the trophy title. If you watch the video, he was uncomfortable with the beating itself, but acknowledged it fit the game and the character. Kratos is vicious, nasty, brutish, the 'victim' is evil and monstrous and just as capable of nastiness herself. The trophy title adds an uncomfortable context to the beating there otherwise would not have been.jcfrommars9 said:That tells me that ultimately, Sessler spoke without proper context. Perhaps because of the embargo but that is irresponsible. Plus Sessler's criticism implies that Kratos' reasons for beating up Alecto was because she was a woman not because she was evil and just as brutal and powerful as he is. As Kratos and players quickly find out, she cannot be defeated so easily.
True, but I never said otherwise.
break the phrase down, it ultimately means 'treat males as your soul brothers. treat females as ephemeral things you use for sex.' The alteration takes the uncomfortable connotations away, and honestly makes the line funnier.
Except, he didn't misinterpret it. He got the context and facts right. Watch the segment of the video where he talks about it. the cutscene happens right after the fight, the trophy pops. it sums up the moment not as you defeated an evil monster, and her son chooses to aid you because he believes in your cause, but you pimp slapped that ho and your bro was ok wid dat.jcfrommars9 said:The phrase "Bros before Hos" has more than one meaning. Some deliberately derogatory, some a figure speech, certainly not always meaning that women in general are objects only to be used for sex. In this case, it was regarding Orkos betrayal of the Furies to Kratos. I'm not concerned about the alteration. If you're happy with it, that's fine. I'm concerned because of how badly Sessler misinterpreted the scene. How it was acceptable that Sessler didn't need to regard context or facts, just as long as he implied that it was sexist or misogynistic, then it's alright which it again, it wasn't.
But they did. End of story. Now, move along.Brad Shepard said:They should not have to change a stupid joke because of butthurt people
Time and energy you're now also wasting on something that's already done.Shadowstar38 said:Time and energy is being wasted to avoid people who can't take a joke from getting upset. I don't want companies folding every time someone kicks up a fuss.
The fact that it's been predominantly a bogeyman term since its use in non-Russian culture. "Political Correctness" in america is about as apt as calling Obama a Nazi. If either were true, you wouldn't be free to say them.Dahemo said:What's so awful about being PC?