Hellkite_Overload said:
It just annoys me to no end that people always pick on how the "lightsaber isn't possible" by tearing down theories that AREN'T how lightsabers function!!!
But lightsabres DON'T function. They are fictional.
Even fictional accounts of how they function differ wildly:
Macgyvercas said:
From the Star Wars Wiki
[small][font color=gray]The weapon consisted of a blade of pure plasma emitted from the hilt and suspended in a force containment field. The field contained the immense heat of the plasma, protecting the wielder, and allowed the blade to keep its shape.[/font][/small]
From the Star Wars Databank:
[small][font color=gray]Once unleashed, the power channels through a positively charged continuous energy lens at the center of the handle. The beam then arcs circumferentially back to a negatively charged high energy flux aperture. A superconductor transfers the power from the flux aperture to the power cell.[/font][/small]
Two completely different explanations, both equally meaningless.
If you demand that a real-life lightsabre work just like its fictional counterpart is claimed to, then it is obviously never going to work, because the fictional claims are meaningless technobabble. So physicists must answer the question "could a lightsabre be possible?" by looking at how the real laws of physics might allow a device that exhibits the same behaviour as a lightsabre. Hence we investigate real things like lasers and plasma. If it exhibits the same behaviour as the fictional lightsabre, then it IS a lightsabre, regardless of whether it uses lasers or plasma or whatever. You can't just say it's not a lightsabre because it uses some technology which isn't mentioned in Star Wars canon, because then you'd NEVER be able to make one EVER.
Hellkite_Overload said:
Simply using the term "energy" leaves it open to interpretation what kind of energy is to be utilized (and thus avoids unneccessary nit-picking).
And avoids unnecessary actual explaining of anything whatsoever.
Light and plasma could both be argued to be forms of energy, anyway.
I generally think of the "energy" as being perhaps electrical.
So it is constantly moving electrons, then. That would require an awful lot of power to push them through the air, which is not a good electrical conductor at all.
Creating a contained "arc-loop" of intense electrical energy (think ARC welder in blade form)
Electrical arcs follow the path of least resistance, usually an approximately straight line from electrode to electrode. Do you propose a way to extend this path?
Hellkite_Overload said:
I never said that the design required a field that could "cap off" I actually stated that that IS impossible (that's why the plasma idea doesn't work, and why lightsabers CAN'T be made with plasma)
It's also the reason why your proposal doesn't work.
This whole discussion is basically theoretical technology at this point, so nothing within reason can be discounted wholely.
Our side of the discussion is theoretical. Your side of the discussion is just making stuff up.
